Growth Regulators in Populus tremula IV. Apical Dominance and Suckering in Young Plants

1971 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
LENNART ELIASSON
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 434-437
Author(s):  
Cristina Soares de Souza ◽  
◽  
Ana Paula Sato Ferreira ◽  
Fernando Luiz Finger ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
Diana R. Cochran ◽  
Marisol Benitez-Ramirez ◽  
Amy Fulcher

Cutting-propagated ‘Alice’ oakleaf hydrangea (Hydrangea quercifolia Bartr.) often produces a few vigorous branches with apical dominance, thus suppressing growth of other branches. As a result, the maturing canopy is sparse and develops asymmetrically, rendering plants unappealing to customers. For this reason, growers prune or apply plant growth regulators (PGRs) to encourage more branching, thereby producing a more desirable product. Propagation through tissue culture may provide another option to increase branching as an outcome of habituation. Habituation occurs when plant cultures continue to respond to a hormone that is no longer being supplied and, in turn, frequently leads to more branching. We evaluated oakleaf hydrangea growth as affected by propagation technique [tissue-cultured (TC) and cutting-propagated (CUT)] and PGR (cyclanilide and benzyladenine) application during container production. Nontreated TC plants had more branches longer than 15.2 cm (6 in) compared to nontreated CUT plants in 2008, although not in 2010. In both years, single applications of cyclanilide did not affect total branch number but two applications increased total branch number compared to nontreated plants, averaged over propagation technique. Plants treated with benzyladenine had similar or fewer total branches compared with nontreated, hand-pruned, and cyclanilide-treated plants (one or two treatments). Propagation technique did not consistently influence response to PGRs.


HortScience ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 908C-908
Author(s):  
Miklos Faust

At the beginning and near to the end of the endodormant period, cytokinin-type growth regulators are effective to end dormancy in apple. The same growth regulators are not effective during the middle of this period. Terminal buds require less chilling than lateral buds to emerge from the dormant period. Lateral buds on decapitated shoots also require less chilling, indicating that auxin may be involved in dormancy. Replacing the terminal with IAA keeps water in bound state in the lateral buds, indicating the effect of IAA in dormancy. We have developed the theory that the beginning and the end of the winter-dormant period is governed by apical dominance. It appears that only this period can be manipulated either with dormancy avoidance methods or with dormancy-breaking chemicals. The central portion of the dormant period is not subject to manipulation. Therefore, it is important that the depth of the dormancy is quantified. Certain growth regulators can be used for determining the state of bud dormancy. Thidiazuron gives results within 2 to 4 days.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document