Evaluation of a new recommendation for improved cuffed tracheal tube size selection in infants and small children

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Salgo ◽  
A. Schmitz ◽  
G. Henze ◽  
K. Stutz ◽  
A. Dullenkopf ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071114222724010-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
CAROLINE DURACHER ◽  
EMMANUELLE SCHMAUTZ ◽  
CLAIRE MARTINON ◽  
JUDITH FAIVRE ◽  
PIERRE CARLI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hwan Ahn ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Min Soo Kim ◽  
Hyun Cheol Kang ◽  
Il Seok Kim

AbstractWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using airway ultrasonography to select the correct tracheal tube size and insertion depth in pediatric patients who underwent cleft repair surgery as a way to decrease airway complications and adverse events during perioperative periods. Fifty-one patients (age < 28 months) were consecutively divided into conventional (n = 28) and ultrasound (n = 23) groups. Tracheal tube size and insertion depth were determined using the age-based formula and auscultation in the conventional group, whereas using ultrasonographic measurement of subglottic diameter with auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the ultrasound group. We evaluated the initially selected tube size, insertion depth, ventilatory indices, and the incidence of airway complications and adverse events. Tube insertion depth (median [interquartile range]) was significantly greater in the ultrasound group than in the conventional group (13.5 cm [12.5–14.0] vs 13.0 cm [11.8–13.0], P = 0.045). The number of complications and adverse events was significantly higher in the conventional group than in the ultrasound group (32.1% vs 4.3%, P = 0.013). Airway ultrasound application could reduce airway-related complications and adverse events by determining the appropriate tracheal tube size and insertion depth.


Genetics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 185 (3) ◽  
pp. 831-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Nelson ◽  
Mikio Furuse ◽  
Greg J. Beitel

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Hegland ◽  
Sebastian Schnitzler ◽  
Jan Ellensohn ◽  
Marc P Steurer ◽  
Markus Weiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patient`s lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes. Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. Methods: In this observational study in a benchmark in-vitro setup, several dimensional parameters of four sizes of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes from six different manufacturers were assessed, such as distances and diameters of tube shaft, cuff lengths and diameters as well the angle at the tip. Results: Endobronchial tubes of ostensibly the same size revealed wide variation in measured parameters between brands from different manufacturers. In some parameters, there was an overlap between different sizes from the same manufacturer, i.e. diameters and distances did not increase with increasing nominal endobronchial tube size. The information about dimensions of endobronchial tubes provided by manufacturers’ leaflets is insufficient. Conclusions: Endobronchial tube size selection is complicated because clinically relevant parameters are unknown and vary considerably between different manufacturers. Keywords: Airway management, double-lumen endobronchial tubes


1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 969
Author(s):  
Hae Ja Lim ◽  
Hye Won Lee ◽  
Mi Kyeong Lee ◽  
Seong Ho Chang ◽  
Jung Soon Shin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document