airway ultrasound
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-91
Author(s):  
Amedeo Bianchini ◽  
Elena Zangheri ◽  
Enrico Bernardi ◽  
Antonio Siniscalchi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael S. Kristensen ◽  
Wendy H. Teoh
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Carsetti ◽  
Massimiliano Sorbello ◽  
Erica Adrario ◽  
Abele Donati ◽  
Stefano Falcetta

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Adler ◽  
Asad Siddiqui ◽  
Arvind Chandrakantan ◽  
Clyde T. Matava

Author(s):  
Carmen Diaz‐Tormo ◽  
Enver Rodriguez‐Martinez ◽  
Laura Galarza

ASRA News ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sree Kolli ◽  
Mandeep Singh
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hwan Ahn ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Min Soo Kim ◽  
Hyun Cheol Kang ◽  
Il Seok Kim

AbstractWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using airway ultrasonography to select the correct tracheal tube size and insertion depth in pediatric patients who underwent cleft repair surgery as a way to decrease airway complications and adverse events during perioperative periods. Fifty-one patients (age < 28 months) were consecutively divided into conventional (n = 28) and ultrasound (n = 23) groups. Tracheal tube size and insertion depth were determined using the age-based formula and auscultation in the conventional group, whereas using ultrasonographic measurement of subglottic diameter with auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the ultrasound group. We evaluated the initially selected tube size, insertion depth, ventilatory indices, and the incidence of airway complications and adverse events. Tube insertion depth (median [interquartile range]) was significantly greater in the ultrasound group than in the conventional group (13.5 cm [12.5–14.0] vs 13.0 cm [11.8–13.0], P = 0.045). The number of complications and adverse events was significantly higher in the conventional group than in the ultrasound group (32.1% vs 4.3%, P = 0.013). Airway ultrasound application could reduce airway-related complications and adverse events by determining the appropriate tracheal tube size and insertion depth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e01369
Author(s):  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Sung-Ae Cho ◽  
Sang-Hwan Ji ◽  
Young-Eun Jang ◽  
Eun-Hee Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 606-611
Author(s):  
Satyapal Dhaka ◽  
◽  
Sunita Meena ◽  
Gopal Bansal ◽  
Bheru Dan Charan ◽  
...  

Background and AIMS: Airway ultrasound is novel,safe and noninvasive modality that help in predicting difficult airway.This study aimed todetermine the usefulness of airway ultrasound in order to predict difficult intubation. Method:- This was a hospital based prospective observational study on 100 patients aged 18-60 years of either sex undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.Preoperatively physical airway evaluation was performed byusing six parameters including Modified Mallampati class(MMC), thyromental distance(TMD), sternomental distance(SMD) , inter-incisor (IID)distance , hyomental distance(HMD)and neck circumference(NC). In preoperatively, Airway Ultrasoundwas performed andnoted the ratio of the depth of the pre‑epiglottic space (PES) to the distance from the epiglottis to the mid‑point of the distance between the vocal cords (E‑VC). CL grade was also noted during laryngoscopy. Compared ultrasound parameters with Cormack–Lehane grade. Specificity,Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracywere calculated.Airway ultrasound measurements were compared with physical parametersin predicting Cormack –Lehane grade. Results: The incidence of difficult intubation was 7%. Sensitivity of PES/E-VC ratio was higher than NC, TMD, HMD, IID and SMD but less than Mallampati class. Specificity, PPV was lower than physical parameters.NPV was comparable. Conclusion: Percutaneous airway ultrasound is useful and promising technique for predicting Cormack and Lehane grading but a combination of all these is definitely helpful for better prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document