scholarly journals Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and other non-invasive imaging modalities in assessing bile duct stones

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R Scott ◽  
Philip I Craig
2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Gautier ◽  
Frank Pilleul ◽  
Arielle Crombe-Ternamian ◽  
Laurent Gruner ◽  
Thierry Ponchon ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 720-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Ward ◽  
Laura M. Fluke ◽  
Benjamin D. Hoagland ◽  
Gregory J. Zarow ◽  
Jenny M. Held ◽  
...  

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard in evaluation of the biliary tree for choledocholithiasis. Formal indications for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in suspected choledocholithiasis are lacking. Our objective was to determine if MRCP affects management of patients who otherwise would undergo ERCP. A review was conducted of all MRCPs and ERCPs at our institution from 2008 to 2012 with suspected choledocholithiasis. Patients who underwent MRCP and ERCP were compared with those who underwent ERCP alone. Demographic data were collected and notation of whether a post-MRCP ERCP occurred was the primary variable. MRCP was performed in 107 patients for choledocholithiasis. Eighty-eight patients were negative for choledocholithiasis (82%) and 76 were discharged without ERCP (71%). Thirty-one patients received a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and were referred for ERCP. Of the 19 patients with MRCP-diagnosed common bile duct stones, 95 per cent were confirmed by ERCP (odds ratio 18.0, P > 0.05; agreement 77%, sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.86, positive predictive value 0.95, negative predictive value 0.50). Length of stay was similar for all groups. A total of 131 patients underwent ERCP without a preprocedural MRCP. Choledocholithiasis was found in 116 patients (92%), whereas 12 patients (9%) had no common bile duct stones and three had an alternate diagnosis. In conclusion, MRCP significantly affected the management of patients who would have undergone ERCP. MRCP did not increase length of stay and contributed to the 95 per cent positivity rate of subsequent ERCPs. These data illustrate the utility of MRCP in suspected choledocholithiasis patients at a low cost with regard to risk and time.


Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Benjamin Giles ◽  
Chris Palmer-Jones ◽  
William Crinnion ◽  
Mohammed Syed ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2002
Author(s):  
M. Valarmathi ◽  
Anandi Andappan

Background: Choledocholithiasis implies stones in the common bile duct (CBD). Most of the common bile duct stones are those that have passed into the bile duct from the gall bladder. About 20 to 25% of patients above the age of 60 with symptomatic gall stones are likely to have stones in the CBD. To analyse the role of ERCP and MRCP in the management of choledocholithiasis.Methods: About 60 patients who are attending the General Surgery OPD of Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from the October 2017-March 2018 were included in the study with confirmed common bile duct stones with or without gall stones were chosen. patients were categorized into group A- who has undergone a successful ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and group B- who underwent open cholecystectomy with CBD exploration.Results: Ultrasonography was done in 57 patients, of which 41 patients showed CBD stones (71.93%), 12 patients showed dilated CBD in the presence of cholelithiasis (21.05%) and in the remaining 4 patients (7.01%) this investigation showed only cholelithiasis. Since clinical condition warranted, authors proceeded with further hepatobiliary imaging, which revealed choledocholithiasis.Conclusions: Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography can also be used for follow up of the patients with choledocholithiasis after therapy, to look for the presence of retained stones, since it can detect stones even in the size as small as 2 mm. Selective use of intraoperative choledochoscopy in suspected cases helps in reducing the incidence of retained stones.


Gut ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
H E Adamek ◽  
J Albert ◽  
M Weitz ◽  
H Breer ◽  
D Schilling ◽  
...  

Background—The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is under debate.Aims—To assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and to determine whether MRCP may help to prevent unnecessary interventional procedures.Methods—Eighty six patients with suspected common bile duct obstruction who presented between January and December 1996 were enrolled. Twenty six were excluded due to anatomical reasons or because MRCP or ERCP could not be performed successfully. Results of MRCP were interpreted by two radiologists and a gastroenterologist unaware of clinical diagnosis. Final diagnosis was determined by ERCP and histopathological findings or a follow up of at least 12 months.Results—MRCP images of diagnostic quality were obtained in all 60 patients. Thirteen patients had a clear bile duct. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any abnormality (n=47) were 89% and 92%, and for the detection of malignancy (n=27) 81% and 100%, respectively. These results were equivalent to the respective figures of ERCP (91% and 92% for any abnormality, and 93% and 94% for malignant diseases).Conclusions—MRCP is as sensitive as ERCP in the evaluation of bilary tract diseases. As the specificity of this non-invasive technique is close to 100%, MRCP may prevent inappropriate invasive explorations of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document