scholarly journals The effect of clinical trial participation versus non-participation on overall survival in men receiving first-line docetaxel-containing chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (11b) ◽  
pp. E575-E582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatinder Goyal ◽  
Philipp Nuhn ◽  
Peng Huang ◽  
Prachi Tyagi ◽  
Daniel Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

Serum testosterone level and overall survival in first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17545-e17545
Author(s):  
Maysa Tamara Silveira Vilbert ◽  
Marcelle Goldner Cesca ◽  
Natasha Carvalho Pandolfi ◽  
Vinicius Fernando Calsavara ◽  
Bruno Cezar de Mendonça Uchôa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Testosterone Level ◽  
Serum Testosterone ◽  
Serum Testosterone Level ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Testosterone Levels ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Low Serum

e17545 Background: Androgen receptor-targeted agents Abiraterone and Enzalutamide (Abi/Ez) prolonged overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients with very-low serum testosterone levels seem to have less benefit from these therapies as well as more aggressive prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate whether a serum testosterone measured at time of start first-line therapy with Abi/Ez is related to overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in mCRPC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox-regression models were used for time-to-event analyses. The best cut-off for testosterone was defined using Log-rank statistics (Lausen and Schumacher). X² test and Mann-Whitney U-test were applied to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess characteristics related to serum testosterone levels. Statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. Results: From May 2012 to February 2017, 100 patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 27.8 months (range 2.23 to 68.26). Pts with a high testosterone level ( > 28.2; n = 20) achieved a significantly higher OS (median 66.0 vs 31.9 mo, testosterone > 28.2 HR: 0.206, 95% CI 0.074 to 0.571, p = 0.002) and TTF (median 30.6 vs 11.8 mo, testosterone > 28.2 HR: 0.408, 95%CI 0.219 to 0.762, p = 0.005) than pts with a low serum testosterone level ( < 28.2; n = 80), regardless of receiving therapy with either Abi (n = 69) or Ez (n = 31). Pts with a higher testosterone level were younger (median 67.7 vs 73.6 years; p = 0.026), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (28.5 vs 25.9, p = 0.023) and a lower PSA at start Abi/Ez (12 vs 26, p = 0.031) than pts with lower values. Age (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.8 to 0.9, p = 0.021), BMI (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.1 to 1.4, p = 0.006) and baseline PSA (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.4, p = 0.020) were significantly associated with testosterone > 28.2. After 4 months of Abi/Ez treatment, PSA decrease > 50% of baseline was seen more frequently in high testosterone levels group than in low testosterone levels pts (90% vs 57.5% of pts, respectively, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Pts with high levels of testosterone ( > 28.2) achieved a better OS and TTF when treated with Abi/Ez in first-line mCRPC than those with low levels. Testosterone can be considered a prognostic and predictive biomarker in this scenario, and could be used in treatment decision for this population.

Overall survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving first-line docetaxel-containing chemotherapy according to their participation (or not) in clinical trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
Jatinder Goyal ◽  
Peng Huang ◽  
Prachi Tyagi ◽  
Daniel Oh ◽  
Michael Anthony Carducci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Trial Participants ◽  
Baseline Hemoglobin

148 Background: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether clinical trial participation can itself lead to improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel chemotherapy. We compared clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with mCRPC receiving first-line docetaxel-containing therapy on a clinical study (trial participants) or outside of a clinical trial (non-participants). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 245 consecutive chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC who received docetaxel-containing therapy between 1/1/1998 and 1/1/2010, either as trial participants (n=142; 11 separate studies) or as non-participants (n=103). Patient demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, treatment details and follow-up data were recorded. Results: In unadjusted analysis, trial participants were more likely to be white (83 vs 70%, p=0.005), to have better ECOG performance status (p=0.01), higher baseline hemoglobin (12.4 vs 11.6 g/dL, p=0.0003), higher albumin (4.3 vs 4.0 g/dL, p=0.009), lower creatinine (0.90 vs 1.04 mg/dL, p=0.01), and to have received a higher number of chemotherapy cycles (6.6 vs 5.1, p=0.001) than non-participants. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, median overall survival was significantly longer among trial participants vs non-participants (21.3 vs 17.1 months, p=0.024). In multivariable analysis, trial participation (HR 0.53, p=0.013), more chemotherapy cycles (HR 0.87; p=0.0002), baseline hemoglobin >12 g/dL (HR 0.67, p=0.016), lower ECOG score (HR 0.57, p=0.026) and lower baseline (log) PSA (HR 0.85, p=0.012) were all found to be independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: Clinical trial participation is an independent positive predictor of overall survival in men undergoing first-line docetaxel-containing chemotherapy for mCRPC. Improved survival in trial participants may reflect better medical oversight typically seen in patients enrolled in clinical trials, more regimented follow-up schedules, or a positive effect on caregivers’ attitudes due to greater contact with medical services.

The effect of treatment sequence on overall survival for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 238-238
Author(s):  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Kazutaka Okita ◽  
Hayato Yamamoto ◽  
Takahiro Yoneyama ◽  
Yasuhiro Hashimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

238 Background: We aimed to evaluate the treatment sequence for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in real-world practice and compare overall survival in each sequential therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients with mCRPC who were initially treated with androgen deprivation therapy as metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer in 14 hospitals between January 2010 and March 2019. The agents for the sequential therapy included new androgen receptor-targeted agents (ART: abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide), docetaxel, and/or cabazitaxel. We evaluated the treatment sequence for mCRPC and the effect of sequence patterns on overall survival. Results: The median age was 71 years. A total of 35 patients received ART-ART, 33 received ART-docetaxel, 68 received docetaxel-ART, and 10 received docetaxel-cabazitaxel sequences. The most prescribed treatment sequence was docetaxel-ART (47%), followed by ART-ART (24%). Overall survival calculated from the initial diagnosis reached 83, 57, 79, 37 months in the ART-ART, ART-docetaxel, docetaxel-ART, and docetaxel-cabazitaxel, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed no significant difference in overall survival between the first-line ART (n = 68) and first-line docetaxel (n = 78) therapies (hazard ratio: HR 0.84, P = 0.530), between the ART-ART (n = 35) and docetaxel-mixed (n = 111) sequences (HR 0.82, P = 0.650), and between the first-line abiraterone (n = 32) and first-line enzalutamide (n = 36) sequences (HR 1.58, P = 0.384). Conclusions: The most prescribed treatment sequence was docetaxel followed by ART. No significant difference was observed in overall survival among the treatment sequences in real-world practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document