Negative Liberty, Liberal and Republican

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Pettit
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Kenyon

This chapter explores the positive structural dimensions of the freedom of speech by using a democratic free speech rationale. While far from the only aspect of positive free speech, it offers a useful example of the freedom’s positive dimensions. The chapter focuses on legal conditions underlying public speech and their links to democratic constitutional arrangements. It outlines the general approach before drawing brief comparisons with two well-known US approaches to free speech and media freedom. The chapter then highlights two of the multiple ways in which ‘positive’ can be used in relation to free speech. Positive may concern positive freedom, the idea that freedom is not only a negative liberty but requires support or enablement. It can also be used in terms of a positive right, typically a legal right enforced through courts.


Author(s):  
QUENTIN SKINNER
Keyword(s):  

This chapter analyses Sir Isaiah Berlin's theory of liberty, In particular, it focuses on Berlin's most celebrated contribution to the debate, his essay entitled ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’. Berlin identifies two concepts of liberty, one positive and the other negative. He assumes that, whenever we speak about negative liberty, we must be speaking about absence of interference. The chapter isolates a third concept of liberty. It attempts to show that we have inherited two rival and incommensurable theories of negative liberty, although in recent times we have generally contrived to ignore one of them.


1998 ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
M. N. S. Sellers
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Aaron Stalnaker

The concluding chapter addresses what contemporary people might learn from the early Confucians about the study’s themes. It argues that moral autonomy is the core of personal autonomy, and that both require training and support to exercise. Furthermore, we should learn to embrace many forms of our dependence on each other as not only inevitable but usually also healthy and good, if society is reasonably well ordered. This has important implications for education, welfare policy, jobs policy, and other areas of government action. A contemporary quasi-Confucian approach to these issues would likely argue for “sufficientarian” government that actively supports family life and work, rather than negative liberty alone. We should also rethink narrow conceptions of expertise, and recognize the sort of generalized human mastery or virtue (autonomy in a broad sense) that directs and makes possible specialized forms of expertise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document