Ethnic differences in relations between family process and child internalizing problems

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 960-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Vendlinski ◽  
Jennifer S. Silk ◽  
Daniel S. Shaw ◽  
Tonya J. Lane
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3627-3636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Schleider ◽  
Hans S. Schroder ◽  
Sharon L. Lo ◽  
Megan Fisher ◽  
Judith H. Danovitch ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Rakow ◽  
Rex Forehand ◽  
Laura McKee ◽  
Nicole Coffelt ◽  
Jennifer Champion ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 105055
Author(s):  
Jean Kjellstrand ◽  
Gary Yu ◽  
J. Mark Eddy ◽  
Miriam Clark ◽  
Arriell Jackson

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Schleider ◽  
John R. Weisz

AbstractDespite major advances in the development of interventions for youth anxiety and depression, approximately 30% of youths with anxiety do not respond to cognitive behavioral treatment, and youth depression treatments yield modest symptom decreases overall. Identifying networks of modifiable risk and maintenance factors that contribute to both youth anxiety and depression (i.e., internalizing problems) may enhance and broaden treatment benefits by informing the development of mechanism-targeted interventions. A particularly powerful network is the rich array of family processes linked to internalizing problems (e.g., parenting styles, parental mental health problems, and sibling relationships). Here, we propose a new theoretical model, the triadic modelof family process, to organize theory and evidence around modifiable, transdiagnostic family factors that may contribute to youth internalizing problems. We describe the model's implications for intervention, and we propose strategies for testing the model in future research. The model provides a framework for studying associations among family processes, their relation to youth internalizing problems, and family-based strategies for strengthening prevention and treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Burgdorf ◽  
Marianna Szabó

Objectives: Mindful parenting, measured by the Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting scale (IMP), is beneficial for parents and children. However, the IMP has not been validated in English-speaking parents. Further, little is known about whether mindful parenting is similar in parents of children vs. infants, or how it reduces child internalizing problems. We sought to validate the IMP in English-speaking mothers of children and infants, and to examine relationships between the facets of mindful parenting, child internalizing problems and parent variables related to internalizing.Methods: Using confirmatory factor analyses, we examined the fit of various models of mindful parenting in English-speaking community-recruited mothers of children aged 3–18 years (n = 396) and infants aged 0–2 years (n = 320). We used regression analyses to investigate relationships between the facets of mindful parenting, child internalizing problems, and parent variables including parental experiential avoidance, unhelpful beliefs about child anxiety and accommodation of child anxiety.Results: Mindful parenting can be measured in English-speaking mothers, using either a 5- or 6-factor, 29-item version of the IMP. These versions of the IMP operate similarly for mothers of children and infants. Child internalizing problems and related parent variables were best predicted by non-judgmental acceptance of parenting in mothers of children, and emotional self-awareness and non-reactivity in mothers of infants.Conclusions: The IMP is a valid measure of mindful parenting in English-speaking mothers of children and infants. Mindful parenting predicts child internalizing problems and related parent variables, suggesting that mindful parenting programs could benefit families of children with internalizing problems, potentially by reducing parental experiential avoidance, unhelpful beliefs about or accommodation of child anxiety.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Jun-Li Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document