scholarly journals Identification of premycorrhiza-related plant genes in the association between Quercus robur and Piloderma croceum

2004 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Kruger ◽  
Tatjana Pescaron;kan-Berghofer ◽  
Patrick Frettinger ◽  
Sylvie Herrmann ◽  
Francois Buscot ◽  
...  
Plant Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 177 (6) ◽  
pp. 540-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo A. Sabelli ◽  
Brian A. Larkins

Mycorrhiza ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Frettinger ◽  
Sylvie Herrmann ◽  
Frédéric Lapeyrie ◽  
Ralf Oelmüller ◽  
François Buscot

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Barrows ◽  
Steven Sexton ◽  
David Zilberman

For millennia, humans have modified plant genes in order to develop crops best suited for food, fiber, feed, and energy production. Conventional plant breeding remains inherently random and slow, constrained by the availability of desirable traits in closely related plant species. In contrast, agricultural biotechnology employs the modern tools of genetic engineering to reduce uncertainty and breeding time and to transfer traits from more distantly related plants. Critics express concerns that the technology imposes negative environmental effects and jeopardizes the health of those who consume the “frankenfoods.” Supporters emphasize potential gains from boosting output and lowering food prices for consumers. They argue that such gains are achieved contemporaneous with the adoption of farming practices that lower agrochemical use and lessen soil. The extensive experience with agricultural biotechnology since 1996 provides ample evidence with which to test the claims of supporters and opponents and to evaluate the prospects of genetic crop engineering. In this paper, we begin with an overview of the adoption of the first generation of agricultural biotechnology crops. We then look at the evidence on the effects of these crops: on output and prices, on the environment, and on consumer health. Finally, we consider intellectual property issues surrounding this new technology.


Mycorrhiza ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Frettinger ◽  
Sylvie Herrmann ◽  
Frédéric Lapeyrie ◽  
Ralf Oelmüller ◽  
François Buscot

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale M. A. Seddas ◽  
Cecilia M. Arias ◽  
Christine Arnould ◽  
Diederik van Tuinen ◽  
Olivier Godfroy ◽  
...  

To gain further insight into the role of the plant genome in arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) establishment, we investigated whether symbiosis-related plant genes affect fungal gene expression in germinating spores and at the appressoria stage of root interactions. Glomus intraradices genes were identified in expressed sequence tag libraries of mycorrhizal Medicago truncatula roots by in silico expression analyses. Transcripts of a subset of genes, with predicted functions in transcription, protein synthesis, primary or secondary metabolism, or of unknown function, were monitored in spores and germinating spores and during interactions with roots of wild-type or mycorrhiza-defective (Myc–) mutants of M. truncatula. Not all the fungal genes were active in quiescent spores but all were expressed when G. intraradices spores germinated in wild-type M. truncatula root exudates or when appressoria or arbuscules were formed in association with wild-type M. truncatula roots. Most of the fungal genes were upregulated or induced at the stage of appressorium development. Inactivation of the M. truncatula genes DMI1, DMI2/MtSYM2, or DMI3/MtSYM13 was associated with altered fungal gene expression (nonactivation or inhibition), modified appressorium structure, and plant cell wall responses, providing first evidence that cell processes modified by symbiosis-related plant genes impact on root interactions by directly modulating AM fungal activity.


Planta Medica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Moodley ◽  
V Maharaj
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document