Low dose aspirin in pregnancy and early childhood development: follow up of the collaborative low dose aspirin study in pregnancy

Author(s):  
The Lancet ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 341 (8840) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
RichardP. Porreco ◽  
DurlinE. Hickok ◽  
MichelleA. Williams ◽  
Cyndy Krenning

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. e77-e81 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Leonhardt ◽  
S. Bernert ◽  
B. Watzer ◽  
G. Schmitz-Ziegler ◽  
H. W. Seyberth

1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
EYAL SCHIFF ◽  
SHLOMO MASHIACH

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 260-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana E. Ayala ◽  
Rafael Ucieda ◽  
Ramón C. Hermida

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Vora ◽  
M Soriano-Gabarro ◽  
B Russell ◽  
H Morgan Stewart

Abstract Background Low-dose aspirin is effective in the prevention of ischemic vascular events and studies have shown a preventative effect on colorectal cancer (CRC). Discontinuation of low-dose aspirin is associated with increased risk of ischaemic vascular events. However, data on long-term persistence to low-dose aspirin from routine clinical practice are limited. Purpose To assess the long-term persistence to low-dose aspirin therapy in the primary and secondary cardiovascular (CVD) prevention population Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from United Kingdom (UK) – The Health Improvement Network database and Germany (DE) – IQVIA Disease Analyzer and analyzed using an adaptation of Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) ATLAS Tool. Patients 18 years or older, with at least two prescriptions of low-dose aspirin (75–100mg) within the first year of index date during the study period between 2007 and 2018, and with at least 12 months of observation before and after the index date were included in the study. The patients with a CVD diagnosis or a CABG/PCI procedure before the index date or a prescription of dual antiplatelet at index date were classified as secondary CVD prevention. The remaining patients were classified as potential primary CVD prevention. The index date was first prescription of low-dose aspirin. Persistence was calculated if the gap between two prescriptions exceeds 60 days. Patients with such gaps still receiving prescription after 60 days were plotted based on the number of gaps identified during the follow-up and if no prescription was recorded then they were considered discontinued. Results The total number of patients receiving low-dose aspirin was 327,806 (183,089 in UK and 144,717 in DE with up to 10 years of follow-up). A total of 112,887 and 101,704 received low-dose aspirin for secondary CVD prevention; 70,202 and 43,013 potentially for primary CVD prevention in UK and DE, respectively. Persistence at two years with a few gaps was 67% and 59% in UK and DE for secondary CVD prevention; 57% and 53% for primary CVD prevention, respectively. With multiple Gaps, 50% and 36% still receive prescription low-dose aspirin for 10 years in UK and DE, respectively for secondary CVD prevention. For Primary prevention, 36% and 32% receive prescription of aspirin for 10 years with multiple gaps in UK and DE (Figure). Conclusion After the initial drop in persistence the patients tend to continue their low-dose aspirin treatment for long-term, although with multiple gaps. Overall, the persistence was higher in secondary compared to primary CVD prevention. Improving persistence to low-dose aspirin therapy in the initial years may help in continuity of their treatment over long-term. Persistence might be underestimated due to potential over the counter use of low-dose aspirin. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bayer AG


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Sayuri Yakuwa ◽  
Sarah Neill ◽  
Débora Falleiros de Mello

ABSTRACT Objective: to appreciate the strategies promoted by nurses in the context of child health surveillance relevant to early childhood development. Method: this is a qualitative study with an inductive thematic analysis of the data, based on the conceptual principles of child health surveillance, and developed through semi-structured interviews with Brazilian nurses working with families in primary health care. Results: the nurses’ strategies in favor of child health surveillance focus on actions that anticipate harm with continuous follow-up and monitoring of health indicators. The process of child growth and development is the basis for responses and benefits to health, connection with the daily lives of families, active search, articulations between professionals and services, access to comprehensive care, and intrinsic actions between promotion, prevention and health follow-up. Conclusion: child health surveillance actions developed by nurses with families involve knowledge sharing, favor the resolution of problems, increase child health indicators, and strengthen the relationship between health and children’s rights, which support the promotion of development in early childhood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document