scholarly journals Effects of the calcium sensitizer OR-1896, a metabolite of levosimendan, on post-infarct heart failure and cardiac remodelling in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats

2010 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjut Louhelainen ◽  
Saara Merasto ◽  
Piet Finckenberg ◽  
Erik Vahtola ◽  
Petri Kaheinen ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Artemio García-Escobar ◽  
Santiago Jiménez-Valero ◽  
Guillermo Galeote ◽  
Alfonso Jurado-Román ◽  
Julio García-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H A Awad ◽  
M Z Mahmoud ◽  
M S Aboelwafa ◽  
A M Shabana ◽  
B M Shehata ◽  
...  

Abstract We report the use of Levosimendan, calcium sensitizer, inodilator in a neonate with post-operative refractory cardiogenic shock. Currently, no data are available on the use of levosimendan in newborns outside the cardiosurgical setting. A 38-week neonate -with isolated exomphalos major-presented post-operatively with pulmonary hypertension, refractory cardiogenic shock (inspite of receiving, a bolus of 10ml/kg, Dopamine and Dobutamine 15µg/kg/min, Adrenaline up to 1mg/Kg/min, Noradrenaline 0.5mg/Kg/min, Terlipressin 20µg/Kg/hour, Milrinone 25µg/Kg/min) and arrhythmia (supraventricular tachycardia). Levosimendan was introduced as an intravenous infusion with an initial rate of 0.1 up to 0.2µg/Kg/min in addition to Noradrenaline 1µg/Kg/min, Dopamine 15µg/Kg/min and Furosemide infusion 0.1mg/Kg/hour. The patient improved evidenced by normalization of vital signs and restoration of perfusion with better cardiac functions by echocardiography. Conclusion: Levosimendan has positive inotropic, lusitropic and vasodilating effects for the treatment of heart failure yet further studies in neonates are still required.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1518-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Jiang ◽  
Qin‐Hua Zhao ◽  
Wen‐Hui Wu ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Ping Yuan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingyu Xu ◽  
Joseph Pagano ◽  
Kelvin Chow ◽  
Gavin Y. Oudit ◽  
Mark J. Haykowsky ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuehua Fang ◽  
Julie Favre ◽  
Magalie Vercauteren ◽  
Brigitte Laillet ◽  
Isabelle Remy-Jouet ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Berezin ◽  
Alexander A. Berezin

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) due to cardiac remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) does not decrease regardless of implementation of new technologies supporting opening culprit coronary artery and solving of ischemia-relating stenosis with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Numerous studies have examined the diagnostic and prognostic potencies of circulating cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome/AMI and heart failure after AMI, and even fewer have depicted the utility of biomarkers in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Although complete revascularization at early period of acute coronary syndrome/AMI is an established factor for improved short-term and long-term prognosis and lowered risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, late adverse cardiac remodelling may be a major risk factor for one-year mortality and postponded heart failure manifestation after PCI with subsequent blood flow resolving in culprit coronary artery. The aim of the review was to focus an attention on circulating biomarker as a promising tool to stratify AMI patients at high risk of poor cardiac recovery and developing HF after successful PCI. The main consideration affects biomarkers of inflammation, biomechanical myocardial stress, cardiac injury and necrosis, fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular reparation. Clinical utilities and predictive modalities of natriuretic peptides, cardiac troponins, galectin 3, soluble suppressor tumorogenicity-2, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, growth differential factor-15, midregional proadrenomedullin, noncoding RNAs, and other biomarkers for adverse cardiac remodelling are discussed in the review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document