scholarly journals Pulsed Radiofrequency: Current Clinical and Biological Literature Available

Pain Medicine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Cahana ◽  
Jan Van Zundert ◽  
Lucian Macrea ◽  
Maarten Van Kleef ◽  
Menno Sluijter
Author(s):  
Justin Hata ◽  
Danielle Perret-Karimi ◽  
Cecil DeSilva ◽  
Daniel Leung ◽  
Naomi Betesh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Hee Kyung Cho ◽  
Gi-Young Park ◽  
Woo Jung Sung ◽  
Sang Gyu Kawk ◽  
Won Bin Jung

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Van Zundert ◽  
Anton J. A. de Louw ◽  
Elbert A. J. Joosten ◽  
Alfons G. H. Kessels ◽  
Wiel Honig ◽  
...  

Background Pulsed radiofrequency treatment has recently been described as a non-neurodestructive or minimally neurodestructive alternative to radiofrequency heat lesions. In clinical practice long-lasting results of pulsed radiofrequency treatment adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion for the management of chronic radicular spinal pain have been reported without neurologic complications. However, the mode of action is unclear. An early (3 h) effect of pulsed radiofrequency as measured by an increase of c-Fos in the pain-processing neurons of the dorsal horn of rats has been described in the literature. This effect was not mediated by tissue heating. The authors investigated a possible late or long-term effect of three different radiofrequency modalities. Methods Cervical laminectomy was performed in 19 male Wistar rats. The cervical dorsal root ganglion was randomly exposed to one of the four interventions: sham, continuous radiofrequency current at 67 centigrades, or pulsed radiofrequency current for 120 s or 8 min. The animals were sacrificed and the spinal cord was prepared for c-Fos labeling 7 days after the intervention. Results The number of c-Fos immunoreactive cells in the dorsal horn was significantly increased in the three different radiofrequency modalities as compared with sham. No significant difference was demonstrated between the three active intervention groups. Conclusions The authors demonstrated a late neuronal activity in the dorsal horn after exposure of the cervical dorsal root ganglion to different radiofrequency modalities, which was not temperature dependent.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3;12 (3;5) ◽  
pp. 633-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen E. Rhame

Pudendal neuralgia (PN) involves severe, sharp pain along the course of the pudendal nerve, often aggravated with sitting. Current therapies include medication management, nerve blocks, decompression surgery, and neuromodulation. The ideal management for PN has not been determined. We present a case of a female with 1.5 years of sharp, burning pain of the left gluteal and perineal regions. She could not sit for longer than 10 to 15 minutes. Sacroiliac joint, epidural, and piriformis injections did not improve her pain. She had tried physical therapy, occupational therapy, massage, and acupuncture but the pain persisted. Medication treatment with oxycodone-acetaminophen, extended release morphine sulfate, amitriptyline, and gabapentin provided only minor relief and she had failed other multianalgesic therapy. She had been unable to work at her desk job for over a year. She had a positive response to 2 diagnostic pudendal nerve blocks with lidocaine that provided pain relief for several hours. This patient elected to undergo pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the left pudendal nerve in hopes of achieving a longer duration and improved pain relief. PRF was carried out at a frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 20 milliseconds for a duration of 120 seconds at 42 degrees Celsius. After the procedure she reported tolerating sitting for 4 to 5 hours. Her multianalgesic therapy was successfully weaned. At 5 months follow-up she felt motivated to return to work. One and a half years after the procedure the patient is only taking oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain relief and still has good sitting tolerance. There were no procedure-related complications. To our knowledge PRF for the treatment of PN has not been reported elsewhere in the literature. PRF is a relatively new procedure and is felt to be safer than continuous radiofrequency. Current literature suggests that PRF delivers an electromagnetic field, which modifies neuro-cellular function with minimal cellular destruction. We conclude that PRF of the pudendal nerve offers promise as a potential treatment of PN that is refractory to conservative therapy. Key words: pudendal neuralgia, pulsed radiofrequency, pudendal nerve, neuromodulation


2010 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 784-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiko Tanaka ◽  
Masaharu Yamaga ◽  
Shingo Tateyama ◽  
Takeshi Uno ◽  
Isao Tsuneyoshi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Hak Lee ◽  
Tae Yoon Kim ◽  
Soo Ho Ha ◽  
Young Eun Kwon ◽  
Chae Sik Yoon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document