Clinical Efficacy of New Antiepileptic Drugs in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Experience in the United States With Three Novel Drugs

Epilepsia ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (s2) ◽  
pp. S23-S26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline A. French
1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S33-S45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orrin Devinsky ◽  
Blanca Vazquez ◽  
Daniel Luciano

After a 15-year hiatus, several new antiepileptic drugs have been approved or are under Food and Drug Administration investigation for use in the United States. This article reviews four of these new drugs—felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin. Although these drugs have been primarily developed for use in adults with partial seizures, they will also likely be used in children with partial epilepsy. Pediatric experience with several of these drugs has demonstrated safety and efficacy in other seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. These drugs will be an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for pediatric epilepsy. Additional studies are needed to fully explore the safety and efficacy of these drugs in a variety of pediatric epilepsies and to compare them to existing antiepileptic drugs. (J Child Neurol 1994;9(Suppl):S33-S45).


Epilepsia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1280-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Costa ◽  
Filipa Fareleira ◽  
Raquel Ascenção ◽  
Margarida Borges ◽  
Cristina Sampaio ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Helmers ◽  
Pierre Emmanuel Paradis ◽  
Ranjani Manjunath ◽  
Mei Sheng Duh ◽  
Marie-Hélène Lafeuille ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengying Lou ◽  
Sunliang Cui

: Epilepsy is a chronic brain disorder caused by abnormal firing of neurons. Up to now, using antiepileptic drugs is the main method of epilepsy treatment. The development of antiepileptic drugs lasted for centuries. In general, most agents entering clinical practice act on the balance mechanisms of brain “excitability-inhibition”. More specifically, they target voltage-gated ion channels, GABAergic transmission and glutamatergic transmission. In recent years, some novel drugs representing new mechanisms of action have been discovered. Although there are about 30 available drugs in the market, it is still in urgent need of discovering more effective and safer drugs. The development of new antiepileptic drugs is into a new era: from serendipitous discovery to evolutionary mechanism-based design. This article presents an overview of drug treatment of epilepsy, including a series of traditional and novel drugs.


Author(s):  
Megan Margiotta ◽  
Timothy Ambrose

When caring for neurosurgical patients, many will either be started on a new antiepileptic medication or will be continued on a regimen that had been started prior to hospitalization. Because of this, it is important for a hospitalist to be familiar with the potential risks and benefits of these medications, even though they may be initiated by a neurosurgeon or neurologist. This chapter discusses several common antiepileptic drugs and their uses in the inpatient setting. This is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion; as of this writing, there are at least 27 unique antiepileptic medications available in the United States alone, with more being studied and produced.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Y. Splinter

Eight new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been approved for use within the United States within the past decade. They are felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide. These afford clinicians with more options to increase efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug interactions with other AEDs and other medications taken for comorbidities are individually discussed for each of these new agents. Drug concentrations are not routinely monitored for these newer agents, and there have been few studies designed to investigate their concentration-effect relationships. For most of these medications, the concentrations observed in responders and nonresponders overlap considerably and levels associated with efficacy are often associated with adverse events, complicating the definition of target ranges. Also, epilepsy manifests itself sporadically causing difficulty in clinically monitoring efficacy of medications. Therapeutic drug monitoring provides for the individualization of treatment for these agents, which is important because they demonstrate significant variability in inter- and intraindividual pharmaco-kinetic properties. Therapeutic drug monitoring also allows for identification of noncompliance, drug interactions, and toxicity. Current knowledge of the relationships between efficacy, toxicity, and drug concentrations is discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (09) ◽  
pp. 879-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas S. Piuzzi ◽  
Mitchell Ng ◽  
Ariel Kantor ◽  
Kenneth Ng ◽  
Stephanie Kha ◽  
...  

AbstractPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are often used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), despite clinical value and cost-effectiveness not being definitely established. PRP injections are considered as a potential means of reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee OA, in the hope of delaying or avoiding the need for surgical intervention. Centers that offer PRP injections usually charge patients out of pocket and directly market services. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the current (1) prices and (2) marketed clinical efficacy of autologous PRP injections for knee OA. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed based on 286 centers identified in the United States offering PRP injections for knee OA. A total of 179 (73.4%) centers were successfully contacted via e-mail or phone, using a simulated 52-year-old male patient with knee OA. Scripted questions were asked by the simulated patient to determine the current marketed prices and clinical efficacy, either reported as “good results” or “symptomatic improvement,” claimed by each treating center. The mean price for a single unilateral knee same-day PRP injection was $714 with a standard deviation of $144 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $691–737, n = 153). The mean claim of clinical efficacy was 76% with a standard deviation of 11% (95% CI: 73.5–78.3%, n = 84). Out of the 84 clinics, 10 claimed “90 to 100% efficacy,” 27 claimed “80 to 90%,” 29 claimed “70 to 80%,” 9 claimed “60 to 70%,” 8 claimed “50 to 60%,” and 1 claimed “40 to 60%.” These findings provide a unique perspective on the PRP market for the treatment of knee OA that is valuable to physicians and health care providers in providing better education to patients on the associated costs and purported clinical benefits of PRP injections.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph I. Sirven ◽  
Patricia O. Shafer ◽  
Linda Kalilani ◽  
Imane Wild ◽  
Jesse Fishman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document