ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PSYCHOTROPIC DRUG USE AND HEART FAILURE THERAPY IN ELDERLY LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENTS

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1973-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Heckman ◽  
Brian Misiaszek ◽  
Fatima Merali ◽  
Irene D. Turpie ◽  
Christopher J. Patterson ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S701
Author(s):  
L. García-Sánchez ◽  
G. Porta-Rius ◽  
B. Pascual-Arce ◽  
M. Blanca-Tamayo ◽  
M.C. Pérez-Navarro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia M. Groot Kormelinck ◽  
Sarah I. M. Janus ◽  
Martin Smalbrugge ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema

ABSTRACT Objectives: Psychotropic drugs are frequently and sometimes inappropriately used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of people with dementia, despite their limited efficacy and side effects. Interventions to address neuropsychiatric symptoms and psychotropic drug use are multifactorial and often multidisciplinary. Suboptimal implementation of these complex interventions often limits their effectiveness. This systematic review provides an overview of barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of complex interventions targeting neuropsychiatric symptoms and psychotropic drug use in long-term care. Design: To identify relevant studies, the following electronic databases were searched between 28 May and 4 June: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and CINAHL. Two reviewers systematically reviewed the literature, and the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. The frequency of barriers and facilitators was addressed, followed by deductive thematic analysis describing their positive of negative influence. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided data synthesis. Results: Fifteen studies were included, using mostly a combination of intervention types and care programs, as well as different implementation strategies. Key factors to successful implementation included strong leadership and support of champions. Also, communication and coordination between disciplines, management support, sufficient resources, and culture (e.g. openness to change) influenced implementation positively. Barriers related mostly to unstable organizations, such as renovations to facility, changes toward self-directed teams, high staff turnover, and perceived work and time pressures. Conclusions: Implementation is complex and needs to be tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of the organization in question. Champions should be carefully chosen, and the application of learned actions and knowledge into practice is expected to further improve implementation.


Brain Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1591-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy F. Kohnen ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen ◽  
Odile M. Smals ◽  
Jan C.M. Lavrijsen ◽  
Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Harrington ◽  
C. Tompkins ◽  
M. Curtis ◽  
L. Grant

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad F. Hagen ◽  
Chris Armstrong-Esther ◽  
Paddy Quail ◽  
Robert J. Williams ◽  
Peter Norton ◽  
...  

Objectives: To examine the use of psychotropic drugs in 24 rural and urban long-term care (LTC) facilities, and compare the effect of an education intervention for LTC staff and family members on the use of psychotropic drugs in intervention versus control facilities.Methods: Interrupted time series with a non-equivalent no-treatment control group time series. Data on drug use were collected in 24 Western Canadian LTC facilities (10 urban, 14 rural) for three 2-month time periods before and after the intervention. Pharmacy records were used to collect data on drug, class of drug, dose, administration, and start/stop dates. Chart reviews provided demographics, pro re nata (prn) use, and indications for drug use. Subjects comprised 2443 residents living in the 24 LTC facilities during the 1-year study. An average of 796.33 residents (32.7%) received a psychotropic drug. An education intervention on psychotropic drug use in LTC was offered to intervention physicians, nursing staff, pharmacists and family members.Results: Approximately one-third of residents received a psychotropic drug during the study, often for considerable lengths of time. A minority of psychotropic drug prescriptions had a documented reason for their use, and 69.5% of the reasons would be inappropriate under Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) legislation. Few psychotropic drug prescriptions were discontinued or reduced during the study. More urban LTC residents received neuroleptics and benzodiazepines than their rural counterparts (26.1% vs. 15.7%, and 18.0% vs. 7.6%, respectively). The education intervention did not result in any significant decline in the use of these drugs in intervention facilities.Conclusion: The results suggest substantial use of psychotropic drugs in LTC, although rural LTC residents received approximately half the number of psychotropic drugs compared with urban residents. A resource-intensive intervention did not significantly decrease the use of psychotropics. There is a need for better monitoring of psychotropic drugs in LTC, particularly given that voluntary educational efforts alone may be ineffective agents of change.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1050-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Aubron ◽  
Vincent Camus ◽  
Badiâa Bouazzaoui ◽  
Antoine Pélissolo ◽  
Grégory Michel

Drugs & Aging ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeev Arinzon ◽  
Alexander Peisakh ◽  
Aneta Zuta ◽  
Yitshal N Berner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document