Efficacy and safety of secondary prophylactic vs. on-demand sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII treatment in adults with severe hemophilia A: results from a 13-month crossover study

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. COLLINS ◽  
A. FARADJI ◽  
M. MORFINI ◽  
M. M. ENRIQUEZ ◽  
L. SCHWARTZ
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Collins ◽  
Albert Faradji ◽  
Massimo Morfini ◽  
Monika Maas Enriquez ◽  
Eduard Gorina ◽  
...  

Abstract Many of the physical, psychosocial, and financial difficulties associated with severe hemophilia can be attributed to the effects of recurrent joint bleeds and chronic arthropathy. Regimens for clotting factor replacement treatment for hemophilia include prophylactic and on-demand therapy. A study in pediatric male patients with severe hemophilia A showed that prophylactic treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS) resulted in prevention of joint damage and a decrease in the frequency of joint and other bleeds compared with on-demand therapy (Manco-Johnson MJ, et al. N Engl J Med.2007;357:535). A clinical trial was conducted in adult patients with severe hemophilia A and history of frequent bleeding to evaluate the effect of secondary rFVIII-FS prophylaxis on the number of joint bleeds after switching from on-demand rFVIII-FS therapy. Secondary study objectives were to compare these treatment strategies with regard to joint function, number of all bleeds, health-related quality of life, health economics, and safety. Male patients who were aged 30–45 years, had a negative inhibitor status, had a history of FVIII treatment (>100 exposure days), and were using on-demand FVIII treatment before the study were eligible to participate in this prospective 13-month crossover study. During the first 6 months, all patients received on-demand rFVIII-FS treatment. Patients were then switched to prophylactic rFVIII-FS treatment (20–40 IU/kg 3 times per wk at a stable dose as determined by investigators based on the patient’s bleeding history) for the remaining 7 months, with the first month constituting a washout/stabilization run-in period. Patients were monitored throughout the 13 months for bleeds and health-economics parameters and were evaluated by the Gilbert score (joint function) and the Haemo-QoL questionnaire at baseline and at the end of the on-demand (at 6 mo) and prophylactic (at 13 mo) treatment periods. A total of 20 patients from 9 international sites participated in the study. Patients received a mean dose of 31 IU/kg/wk during the on-demand period, which increased to 86 IU/kg/wk during the prophylaxis period. Although 16/20 patients already had 1 to 4 target joints, mean (±SD) numbers of joint and total bleeds per patient significantly decreased during the prophylaxis period (1.5±2.1 and 1.9±3.3, respectively) compared with the on-demand period (18.5±11.6 and 23.7±13.3; P<0.001 for both). Mean (±SD) total Gilbert scores indicated better joint function at the end of prophylaxis (19.8±11.7) vs on-demand (25.3±11.7; P<0.001) treatment. During this short observation period, there was no statistically significant difference between treatments in the pharmacoeconomic variables assessed (days off work, general practitioner visits, and hospitalization days) or in the mean total Haemo-QoL score, although patients reported significantly fewer restrictions at work or school by the end of the prophylaxis period compared with the end of the on-demand period (P=0.016). There was a trend toward improved patient activity levels with prophylaxis. Similar numbers of patients reported adverse events (AEs) during on-demand (n=9, 45.0%) and prophylactic (n=10, 52.6%) treatment; AEs occurring in 2 patients (dysgeusia and headache) were considered treatment related. Serious AEs were reported by 1 patient during each treatment; neither serious AE was related to treatment. No de novo inhibitor development was observed during either treatment. In summary, prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS was well tolerated and reduced the frequency of joint and other bleeds compared with on-demand treatment in previously treated adults with severe hemophilia A and target joints.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1103-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Church ◽  
Rajeev Ayyagari ◽  
Jennifer Pocoski ◽  
Gautam Sajeev ◽  
Sneha S Kelkar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: BAY 81-8973 is an investigational recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product with recommended prophylactic dosing of 20-40 IU/kg at least 2x or 3x weekly for patients with severe hemophilia A. The frequency of dosing with FVIII is among several decisions made by treating physicians and potentially affects effectiveness and cost. The impact of prior bleeds or prior FVIII treatment on the choice of BAY 81-8973 dosing frequency has not been studied previously and may help clarify the association of dosing frequency with effectiveness. This study examines the association between prior treatment patterns and bleeds with dose frequency assignment in patients from the LEOPOLD I (LEO I) trial. Methods: Data from part B of the phase II/III randomized, open-label crossover LEO 1 trial were analyzed. The sample consisted of patients who received prophylactic treatment with BAY 81-8973 during the 12-month LEO I study period. At study start, patients were assigned to a dose and a frequency of either 2x/week or 3x/week at the investigator's discretion; once assigned, the dose and frequency were unchanged through the study period. This analysis compared physician-recorded pre-enrollment FVIII treatment frequencies and bleeds during the last 12 months prior to enrollment between the 2x/week and 3x/week groups. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare average dose per FVIII injection and number of bleeds, and chi-square tests were used for mode of treatment (on-demand or prophylaxis) and FVIII treatment frequencies. Results: Among 62 patients in the trial, mean age was 31.5 years and 89% were Caucasians. FVIII prophylaxis frequencies ranged from daily to 1x/week prior to enrollment. 11 patients in the 2x/week group had received pre-enrollment FVIII prophylaxis at a frequency of 2x/week (Table 1). 28 patients in the 3x/week group had received FVIII injections at a frequency of 3x/week prior to enrollment. Some of these patients in each group had also received pre-enrollment FVIII prophylaxis at other frequencies. Average FVIII doses per injection in IU/kg were higher in the 2x/week group for prior on-demand and prophylactic therapy, but these differences were not statistically significant. The majority of patients in the 2x/week group (56%) and the 3x/week group (59%) had received Bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII prior to enrollment. Regardless of prior mode of treatment, the average number of bleeds in the last 12 months before enrollment was higher in the 3x/week group (13.4 bleeds) than in the 2x/week group (7.1 bleeds). Conclusions: Investigator selection of 2x/week or 3x/week dosing frequency was correlated with the regimen patients were on prior to enrollment. Patients receiving FVIII 3x/week had, overall, more frequent bleeding episodes than patients in the 2x/week group in the year prior to enrollment, suggesting that a phenotypic approach can well be used for dosing with Bay 81-8973. Disclosures Church: Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Ayyagari:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pocoski:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Sajeev:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kelkar:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Du:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mass-Enriquez:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Xie:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Haematologica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1351-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W.J.H. Dielis ◽  
W. M.R. Balliel ◽  
R. van Oerle ◽  
W. T. Hermens ◽  
H. M.H. Spronk ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 4693-4697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Carmen Escuriola Ettinghausen ◽  
Ulf Tedgård ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.


1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 779-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Laurian ◽  
E. P. Satre ◽  
A. Borel Derlon ◽  
H. Chambost ◽  
P. Moreau ◽  
...  

SummaryFifty French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII <1%), treated with only one brand of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), were evaluated for inhibitor development, assessment of risk factors and outcome of immune tolerance regimen. The median period on study was 32 months (range 9-74) since the first injection of rFVIII. Fourteen patients (28%) developed an inhibitor, four of whom (8%) with a high titer (≥10 BU). All inhibitor patients but one continued to receive rFVIII either for on-demand treatment or for immune tolerance regimen (ITR). Among these patients, inhibitor was transient in 2 (4%), became undetectable in 6 and was still present in 6. The prevalence of inhibitor was 12%. Presence of intron 22 inversion was found to be a risk factor for inhibitor development. Immune tolerance was difficult to achieve in our series despite a follow-up period of 16 to 30 months: immune tolerance was complete in only one out of the 3 patients undergoing low dose ITR and in one out of the 5 patients with high dose ITR.


Author(s):  
N. I. Zozulya ◽  
O. I. Yastrubinetskaya ◽  
S. S. Belyaeva ◽  
V. M. Potapkova ◽  
I. L. Davydkin ◽  
...  

Relevance. In accordance with the guidelines on the clinical investigation of clotting factor VIII products of the European Medicines Agency and guidelines on pharmacovigilance of the Eurasian Economic Union, after registration of a new drug, it is recommended to study its efficacy and safety on a large population of patients in a standard medical practice to clarify and identify new data.Materials and methods. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled observational study, the efficacy and safety of the domestic recombinant B-domain deleted blood clotting factor FVIII (FVIII) (moroctocog alfa, Octofactor®, JSC “GENERIUM”) in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A in the context of standard medical practice (study protocol number CI-51/15). Patients received the drug in terms of standard medical practice for the purpose of prophylactic treatment or on demand treatment. For prophylactic treatment Octofactor was administered to patients according to the instructions for medical use in a single dose of 20–40 IU/kg every 2–3 days. In the case of bleeding a single dose of Octofactor was calculated taking into account the severity and localization of bleeding in accordance with the instructions for medical use. The results of the treatment were analyzed for a period of 52 ± 2 weeks. The main parameter for evaluating the efficacy was the frequency of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after the administration of the Octofactor. Additional parameters for evaluating the efficacy included: the severity of spontaneous bleeding arising during the prophylactic treatment; the number of injections and the total dose of the Octofactor to stop 1 episode of bleeding; the amount of Octofactor used during the entire observation period (52 ± 2 weeks) and for 1 month both for prophylaxis and for stopping the bleeding that occurred; an indicator of the efficacy of therapy on the scale for determining the response to treatment of acute hemarthrosis (World Federation of Hemophilia, WFH).Results.According to the results of the screening survey 237 male patients aged from 19 to 78 years old (mean age 35.2 ± 11.1 years) with moderate and severe hemophilia A (FAS-population) were included in the study. The efficacy of therapy was evaluated in 202 patients who underwent all the planned procedures during the observation period (PP-population). 193 (95.5 %) patients received prophylactic treatment, 9 (4.5 %) patients received on-demand treatment. Evaluation of the efficacy of treatment was carried out on the basis of basic and additional parameters. The main parameter for evaluating the efficacy – the frequency of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after the administration of the Octofactor – was 52 ± 2 weeks within 1.4 ± 2.9 cases. At the same time, the proportion of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after administration of the Octofactor preparation was 45.2 % of the total number of spontaneous bleeding and 15.6 % of the total number of all bleeding in patients who received prophylactic treatment. Among 608 spontaneous bleeding that occurred in patients receiving prophylactic treatment, 287 (47.2 %) of the bleeding were mild, 289 (47.5 %) were moderate and 32 (5.3 %) were heavy. Of the 275 spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after administration of the study drug for prophylactic purposes, 117 (42.5 %) episodes were mild, 146 (53.1 %) were moderate, and 12 (4.4 %) were severe. With prophylactic administration the average single dose of the Octofactor was 2036.3 ± 884.7 IU, or 27.3 ± 11.2 IU/kg, in the treatment of bleeding occured during prophylactic treatment – 2227.7 ± 1087 IU, in the treatment of bleeding in patients receiving the drug only on demand – 2280.7 ± 1037.2 IU. The average monthly intake of the drug by one patient in prophylactic treatment was 19.75 ± 9.75 thousand IU, while the average monthly consumption of the drug for preventing bleeding from one patient was 17.16 ± 9.13 thousand IU for stopping bleeding against the background prevention – 3.87 ± 3.97 thousand IU. One patient who received on-demand treatment had an average monthly average of 13.47 ± 13.46 thousand IU of the Octofactor preparation. For stopping 1 bleeding, on average, 1.7 ± 1.7 injections of the Octofactor preparation were required, in the prophylactic treatment group – 1.8 ± 1.8, and in the on-demand treatment group – 1.5 ± 1.1. In the overwhelming majority of cases, patients of both groups showed excellent and good response to all treatment of acute hemarthrosis on the scale of the WFH on all visits, the reaction was moderate in a few episodes, and only in 1 case of acute hemarthrosis there was no response to the drug administration. The safety of therapy was evaluated in 228 patients who received at least 1 Octofactor administration during the study (mITT-population). There were 66 adverse events in 40 patients, 10 of them were associated with the use of the drug, the most significant of which were the formation of inhibiting antibodies to FVIII in low titer (1.5 U) in 1 patient and the development of allergic reactions in 2 patients.Conclusions.Under the conditions of standard medical practice the efficacy and safety of Octofactor was confirmed for both prophylactic treatment and on-demand bleeding treatment in adult patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document