scholarly journals Patterns of Prior Treatment and Bleeds Among Patients with Severe Hemophilia a: Impact on Frequency of Dosing with Bay 81-8973 in the Leopold I Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1103-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Church ◽  
Rajeev Ayyagari ◽  
Jennifer Pocoski ◽  
Gautam Sajeev ◽  
Sneha S Kelkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Dosing Frequency ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: BAY 81-8973 is an investigational recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product with recommended prophylactic dosing of 20-40 IU/kg at least 2x or 3x weekly for patients with severe hemophilia A. The frequency of dosing with FVIII is among several decisions made by treating physicians and potentially affects effectiveness and cost. The impact of prior bleeds or prior FVIII treatment on the choice of BAY 81-8973 dosing frequency has not been studied previously and may help clarify the association of dosing frequency with effectiveness. This study examines the association between prior treatment patterns and bleeds with dose frequency assignment in patients from the LEOPOLD I (LEO I) trial. Methods: Data from part B of the phase II/III randomized, open-label crossover LEO 1 trial were analyzed. The sample consisted of patients who received prophylactic treatment with BAY 81-8973 during the 12-month LEO I study period. At study start, patients were assigned to a dose and a frequency of either 2x/week or 3x/week at the investigator's discretion; once assigned, the dose and frequency were unchanged through the study period. This analysis compared physician-recorded pre-enrollment FVIII treatment frequencies and bleeds during the last 12 months prior to enrollment between the 2x/week and 3x/week groups. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare average dose per FVIII injection and number of bleeds, and chi-square tests were used for mode of treatment (on-demand or prophylaxis) and FVIII treatment frequencies. Results: Among 62 patients in the trial, mean age was 31.5 years and 89% were Caucasians. FVIII prophylaxis frequencies ranged from daily to 1x/week prior to enrollment. 11 patients in the 2x/week group had received pre-enrollment FVIII prophylaxis at a frequency of 2x/week (Table 1). 28 patients in the 3x/week group had received FVIII injections at a frequency of 3x/week prior to enrollment. Some of these patients in each group had also received pre-enrollment FVIII prophylaxis at other frequencies. Average FVIII doses per injection in IU/kg were higher in the 2x/week group for prior on-demand and prophylactic therapy, but these differences were not statistically significant. The majority of patients in the 2x/week group (56%) and the 3x/week group (59%) had received Bayer's sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII prior to enrollment. Regardless of prior mode of treatment, the average number of bleeds in the last 12 months before enrollment was higher in the 3x/week group (13.4 bleeds) than in the 2x/week group (7.1 bleeds). Conclusions: Investigator selection of 2x/week or 3x/week dosing frequency was correlated with the regimen patients were on prior to enrollment. Patients receiving FVIII 3x/week had, overall, more frequent bleeding episodes than patients in the 2x/week group in the year prior to enrollment, suggesting that a phenotypic approach can well be used for dosing with Bay 81-8973. Disclosures Church: Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Ayyagari:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pocoski:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Sajeev:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kelkar:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Du:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mass-Enriquez:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Xie:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Efficacy and Safety of Secondary Prophylactic Versus On-Demand Sucrose-Formulated Recombinant Factor VIII Treatment in Adults with Severe Hemophilia A: Results from a 13-Month Crossover Study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Collins ◽  
Albert Faradji ◽  
Massimo Morfini ◽  
Monika Maas Enriquez ◽  
Eduard Gorina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Economics ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Crossover Study ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Joint Function ◽  
On Demand ◽  
History Of ◽  
Male Patients

Abstract Many of the physical, psychosocial, and financial difficulties associated with severe hemophilia can be attributed to the effects of recurrent joint bleeds and chronic arthropathy. Regimens for clotting factor replacement treatment for hemophilia include prophylactic and on-demand therapy. A study in pediatric male patients with severe hemophilia A showed that prophylactic treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS) resulted in prevention of joint damage and a decrease in the frequency of joint and other bleeds compared with on-demand therapy (Manco-Johnson MJ, et al. N Engl J Med.2007;357:535). A clinical trial was conducted in adult patients with severe hemophilia A and history of frequent bleeding to evaluate the effect of secondary rFVIII-FS prophylaxis on the number of joint bleeds after switching from on-demand rFVIII-FS therapy. Secondary study objectives were to compare these treatment strategies with regard to joint function, number of all bleeds, health-related quality of life, health economics, and safety. Male patients who were aged 30–45 years, had a negative inhibitor status, had a history of FVIII treatment (>100 exposure days), and were using on-demand FVIII treatment before the study were eligible to participate in this prospective 13-month crossover study. During the first 6 months, all patients received on-demand rFVIII-FS treatment. Patients were then switched to prophylactic rFVIII-FS treatment (20–40 IU/kg 3 times per wk at a stable dose as determined by investigators based on the patient’s bleeding history) for the remaining 7 months, with the first month constituting a washout/stabilization run-in period. Patients were monitored throughout the 13 months for bleeds and health-economics parameters and were evaluated by the Gilbert score (joint function) and the Haemo-QoL questionnaire at baseline and at the end of the on-demand (at 6 mo) and prophylactic (at 13 mo) treatment periods. A total of 20 patients from 9 international sites participated in the study. Patients received a mean dose of 31 IU/kg/wk during the on-demand period, which increased to 86 IU/kg/wk during the prophylaxis period. Although 16/20 patients already had 1 to 4 target joints, mean (±SD) numbers of joint and total bleeds per patient significantly decreased during the prophylaxis period (1.5±2.1 and 1.9±3.3, respectively) compared with the on-demand period (18.5±11.6 and 23.7±13.3; P<0.001 for both). Mean (±SD) total Gilbert scores indicated better joint function at the end of prophylaxis (19.8±11.7) vs on-demand (25.3±11.7; P<0.001) treatment. During this short observation period, there was no statistically significant difference between treatments in the pharmacoeconomic variables assessed (days off work, general practitioner visits, and hospitalization days) or in the mean total Haemo-QoL score, although patients reported significantly fewer restrictions at work or school by the end of the prophylaxis period compared with the end of the on-demand period (P=0.016). There was a trend toward improved patient activity levels with prophylaxis. Similar numbers of patients reported adverse events (AEs) during on-demand (n=9, 45.0%) and prophylactic (n=10, 52.6%) treatment; AEs occurring in 2 patients (dysgeusia and headache) were considered treatment related. Serious AEs were reported by 1 patient during each treatment; neither serious AE was related to treatment. No de novo inhibitor development was observed during either treatment. In summary, prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS was well tolerated and reduced the frequency of joint and other bleeds compared with on-demand treatment in previously treated adults with severe hemophilia A and target joints.

scholarly journals Factor VIII Use in the Treatment of Breakthrough Bleeds in Hemophilia A Patients without Inhibitors on Emicizumab Prophylaxis: The Phase 3 HAVEN 3 Study Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2395-2395
Author(s):  
Michael Callaghan ◽  
Benjamin Trzaskoma ◽  
Richard H. Ko ◽  
Lucy Lee ◽  
Anisha M. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Exposure Time ◽  
Cumulative Dose ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Breakthrough Bleeding ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Individual

Introduction HAVEN 3 was a phase 3 study investigating the use of emicizumab as prophylaxis in adult and adolescent (≥12 years old) persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors (NCT02847637; Mahlangu et al. 2018). HAVEN 3 demonstrated that emicizumab prophylaxis once weekly or every two weeks was safe and highly effective in bleed prevention. The primary analysis of HAVEN 3 included an intrapatient comparison of 48 participants who received FVIII prophylaxis in a non-interventional study (NIS) prior to enrollment in HAVEN 3. Compared with emicizumab prophylaxis during the HAVEN 3 study, emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an annualized bleed rate that was 68% lower than the rate with previous FVIII prophylaxis (1.5 vs 4.8, p<0.001). No dosing guidance was provided regarding the use of on-demand FVIII in HAVEN 3, and investigators prescribed FVIII at their own discretion. In this subsequent analysis, we characterize the dose and frequency of replacement FVIII used for the treatment of breakthrough bleeding in these 48 participants. Methods The primary comparisons in our analyses are focused on on-demand FVIII use for breakthrough bleeding while participants were on FVIII prophylaxis during the NIS versus its use while on emicizumab prophylaxis during HAVEN 3. Any use of on demand FVIII other than to manage breakthrough bleeding (e.g. prior to activity) was not included in our analyses. Given that, collectively, the total exposure time to emicizumab during HAVEN 3 was more than twice the exposure time to FVIII prophylaxis during the NIS (75.8 vs 28.6 years respectively), any treatment comparisons are drawn on an annualized basis. Annualized on-demand FVIII use was calculated by dividing by the number of days in the efficacy period and multiplying the resulting daily consumption by 365.25 days. The number of infusions and cumulative doses of on-demand FVIII use are described at the participant level as well as at the individual bleed level and are presented descriptively for both the NIS and HAVEN 3 exposure periods. No formal statistical inferences (i.e. calculation of p-values) have been conducted. All analyses were based on an October 2018 data cutoff. Results A total of 48 participants who were treated with FVIII prophylaxis during the NIS were then treated with emicizumab prophylaxis during HAVEN 3 and thus make up the total cohort for our analyses. Annualized infusion rates of on-demand FVIII per participant and cumulative doses of on-demand FVIII (in international units [IU] per kilogram) per participant were higher during the FVIII prophylaxis period when compared with the emicizumab exposure period (mean 15.3 vs 7.2; median 3.6 vs 0.6 annual infusions per participant and mean 602.4 IU/kg vs 209.0 IU/kg; median 75.5 IU/kg vs 19.1 IU/kg, respectively). At the individual bleed level, FVIII infusions and total cumulative dose suggested that participants were administered a similar amount of medication to treat bleeds during both the NIS and HAVEN 3 study periods: median number of infusions per bleed were 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR]=1.0) versus 2.0 (IQR=3.0) and median cumulative doses were 43.5 (IQR=35.1) versus 50.0 (IQR=72.7) IU/kg, respectively (Table 1). Conclusions This analysis revealed a lower annualized infusion rate and a correspondingly lower annualized cumulative dose of FVIII for treatment of breakthrough bleeds during emicizumab prophylaxis compared with FVIII prophylaxis. At the individual bleed level, the amount of on-demand FVIII used per bleeding episode was comparable between NIS and HAVEN 3 exposure periods. Thus, based on this single analysis, it appears that patients received less on-demand FVIII during emicizumab prophylaxis compared with FVIII prophylaxis, as a result of overall reduction of bleed frequency, while the treatment of individual bleeds appeared similar regardless of the prophylaxis therapy administered. Disclosures Callaghan: Octapharma: Consultancy; Novonordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alnylum: Equity Ownership; Biomarin, Bioverativ, Grifols, Kedrion, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Shire, and Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Shire/Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Trzaskoma:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ko:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Lee:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Patel:Genentech: Employment; Roche/Genentech: Equity Ownership. Tzeng:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Shah:Genentech: Employment. Chang:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; Genentech/Roche: Equity Ownership. Niggli:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Dhalluin:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Mahlangu:Sanofi: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Unique: Research Funding.

Target Joint Bleeding in Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia Α Receiving Twice Weekly Prophylaxis with a Pegylated Full-Length Recombinant Factor VIII with Extended Half-Life

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3778-3778
Author(s):  
Amy L. Dunn ◽  
Alexis A. Thompson ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Marlies Sharkhawy ◽  
Brigitt E. Abbuehl
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Patients with hemophilia A are at risk for acute bleeding which may affect muscles and other soft tissues but characteristically involves joints. Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is the optimal treatment to prevent bleeding into joints and, when begun at a young age, may prevent arthropathy. BAX 8551, a polyethylene glycol (peg)ylated, full-length, recombinant FVIII built on ADVATE2, demonstrated extended half-life, efficacy, and safety for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: A phase 3, prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter study was performed in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without history of inhibitors. To be eligible, patients aged <6 years had to have ≥50, those aged 6 to <12 years ≥150 previous exposure days (EDs) to FVIII. Patients received twice weekly infusions of 50 ±10 IU/kg of BAX 855 over a period of 6 months or ≥50 EDs. The prevalence of target joints, defined as a single joint with ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes in any consecutive 6-month period, was assessed at baseline. Annualized rates of target joint bleeds and the course of target joints were evaluated by age (<6 and 6 to <12 years). The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Results:Sixty-six patients were treated with a mean (SD) BAX 855 dose of 51.1 (5.5) IU/kg at a mean (SD) frequency of 1.8 (0.2) infusions/week. Fourteen of 66 patients (21.2%), 3/32 (9.4%) in the younger and 11/34 (32.4%) in the older cohort, had a total of 23 target joints at screening. The number of target joint bleeds decreased during a mean (SD) of 48.5 (7.7; median: 49.0) prophylactic EDs/patient. Five of 66 (7.6%) patients had at least 1 target joint bleed, 1/32 (3.1%) in the younger and 4/34 (11.8%) in the older cohort. The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized rate of target joint bleeds was 0 (0 - infinity; median: 0) compared to an annualized rate of all joint bleeds of 1.1 (0.6 - 1.9; median: 0) and an annualized rate of all bleeds of 3.0 (2.2 - 4.2; median: 2.0) (Table 1). The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in 52 patients without target joints was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.2; median: 2.0) and was similar in 14 patients with target joints at screening at 3.5 (1.9 - 6.6; median: 2.1). In the younger cohort, the ABR was lower in patients with than those without target joints. However, the number of patients <6 years with target joints (N = 3) was too small to draw any conclusions (Table 1). During BAX 855 prophylaxis, no new target joints developed in any patient. Ten of 14 patients had at least 1 target joint revert to a non-target joint. In 8 of these 10 patients, 4 with 1 and 4 with 2 target joints, all target joints resolved. Conclusions:These results suggest that twice weekly infusion of BAX 855 is effective in the prevention of bleeding into target joints and may revert target to non-target joints in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A. 1BAX 855 (Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire) is licensed in the US and Japan under the trade name ADYNOVATE. 2ADVATE is a trade mark of Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire. Disclosures Dunn: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Thompson:Eli Lily: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mast: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharkhawy:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment.

scholarly journals Thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation after in vivo recombinant factor VIII treatment in severe hemophilia A

Haematologica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1351-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W.J.H. Dielis ◽  
W. M.R. Balliel ◽  
R. van Oerle ◽  
W. T. Hermens ◽  
H. M.H. Spronk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Thrombin Generation ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Severe Hemophilia

Recombinant versus plasma-derived factor VIII products and the development of inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 4693-4697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Carmen Escuriola Ettinghausen ◽  
Ulf Tedgård ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Viii Product

Abstract It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.

French Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A after Exposure to Recombinant Factor VIII : Incidence of Inhibitor and Evaluation of Immune Tolerance

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 779-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Laurian ◽  
E. P. Satre ◽  
A. Borel Derlon ◽  
H. Chambost ◽  
P. Moreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Intron 22 Inversion ◽  
Median Period

SummaryFifty French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII <1%), treated with only one brand of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), were evaluated for inhibitor development, assessment of risk factors and outcome of immune tolerance regimen. The median period on study was 32 months (range 9-74) since the first injection of rFVIII. Fourteen patients (28%) developed an inhibitor, four of whom (8%) with a high titer (≥10 BU). All inhibitor patients but one continued to receive rFVIII either for on-demand treatment or for immune tolerance regimen (ITR). Among these patients, inhibitor was transient in 2 (4%), became undetectable in 6 and was still present in 6. The prevalence of inhibitor was 12%. Presence of intron 22 inversion was found to be a risk factor for inhibitor development. Immune tolerance was difficult to achieve in our series despite a follow-up period of 16 to 30 months: immune tolerance was complete in only one out of the 3 patients undergoing low dose ITR and in one out of the 5 patients with high dose ITR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document