THE AVOIDANCE OF FEDERAL PERSONAL INCOME TAXES IN THE UNITED STATES*

1958 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
Jack E. Gelfand
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Income Taxes ◽  
Personal Income

Scandinavian Local Income Taxation: Lessons for the United States?

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Gold
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
National Government ◽  
Institutional Arrangements ◽  
Income Taxes ◽  
Income Taxation ◽  
Local Autonomy ◽  
Tax Base ◽  
Fiscal Disparities

This paper describes and analyzes the experiences of Norway. Sweden and Denmark with local income taxation in order to test the validity of comments made by numerous American economists about such taxes. Although local income taxes are their major source of locally raised revenue, it appears that the problems of revenue instability and tax base mobility are not serious in these countries. Fiscal disparities have been greatly reduced through consolidation of government units and heavy reliance on transfers from the national government, and these institutional arrangements may have reduced local autonomy in some important respects. The heavy reliance on income taxes by all levels of government is one reason for the extremely high marginal tax rales to which most workers are subject.

Evidence on Income Inequality in the United States, 1866–1965

1969 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee C. Soltow
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Civil War ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Wealth Distribution ◽  
The United States ◽  
Turn Of The Century ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Income Groups

It is commonly thought that income distribution among people became more concentrated after the Civil War and that this direction continued until the turn of the century. We can look methodically at the income tax distributions from the Civil War period and compare them directly with the distributions arising from the income tax after 1912. We also have some data from the abortive income tax of 1894. After examining the various blocks of evidence, the conclusion will be made that inequality among upper-income groups did not increase during this period. It is necessary to emphasize that the present investigation is one of income and not of wealth. It might have been possible for the nonhuman wealth distribution among people to remain constant or to increase in inequality while the personal income distribution was decreasing in inequality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document