Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Supplied with Single-Chamber or Dual-Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and purpose Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMi) is needed in about 5% of patients following heart transplant (HTx) primarily due to sinus node dysfunction (SND), which commonly occurs in an early phase, or to atrio-ventricular block (ABV), which is common later on. Currently, data on rate of ventricular pacing (VP) is lacking and little is known on long-term outcomes after PPMi. Methods This was a retrospective, monocentric study. Among 1123 patients treated with HTx, all with biatrial technique, from november 1985 to march 2019 at our institution, 61 (5.4%) patients needed PPMi. PM parameters, clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at 1 month and at 1-3-5-10 years follow-up. The primary aim was to analyse the percentage of right ventricular pacing in the overall population and in subgroups stratified by the timing of PPMi and by pacing indication. Secondary endpoints were to analyze long-term outcomes according to the percentage of ventricular pacing and to the type of implanted PM (single vs. dual chamber). Results Among patients treated with PPMi (68.9% single-chamber), 62.2% were implanted for SND and 36% for AVB. Early PPMi (< 3 months after HTx), occurred in 34.4% of patients, mainly due to SND, while late PPMi (> 3 months after HTx) occurred in 65,6% with an equal distribution between SND and AVB. Median follow-up time from HTx was 140 months and 82 months from PPMi. Overall mean rate of VP was 21%. Rate of VP was higher in patients implanted early rather than late after HTx, both at 1 month (91% vs 2%, P = 0,002) and at 1 year after the procedure (43 vs 1, P = 0,037). Patients with AVB had a greater rate of VP compared to those implanted for SND, irrespective of timing of implantation and these findings were still present at 3 and 5 years follow-up (62 vs 1%, P = 0,011 at 3 years and 80 vs 6%, P = 0,002 at 5 years). VP declined progressively after PPM implantation. No differences were observed in terms of 10-years mortality between early vs late PPMi, dual vs single-chamber and mean VP > 21% vs ≤ 21%. Conclusions Patients treated with PPMi after HTx show on average low percentage of VP over long-term follow-up. AV block indication and early implantation are associated with a higher percentage of VP. The rate of VP, the timing of PPMi and the use of single vs dual chamber PM do not affect overall prognosis or left ventricular systolic function. Our data may justify implantation of a single-chamber PPM, which bears less complications and procedural time, in the majority of HTx patients needing PPMi.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Follow-up Impact of Dual-Chamber Pacing on Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology ◽

10.1111/pace.12016 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 36 (1) ◽

pp. 86-93 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

HU YUE-CHENG ◽

LI ZUO-CHENG ◽

LI XI-MING ◽

DAVID ZHE YUAN ◽

JIN DONG-XIA ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy ◽

Dual Chamber ◽

Dual Chamber Pacing ◽

Long Term Follow Up

Download Full-text

P2878Higher all-cause mortality in patients with implanted dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillators for secondary prevention: an analysis from the Polish ICD Registry

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.1186 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

I Warchol ◽

A Lubinski ◽

M Sterlinski ◽

O Kowalski ◽

K Goscinska-Bis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Secondary Prevention ◽

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽

Dual Chamber ◽

Single Chamber ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

National Cohort ◽

Cardioverter Defibrillators

Abstract Background In the Polish ICD Registry population secondary prevention recipients account for over 27%. Despite the evolution of indications for secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), recommendations regarding the use of ICDs for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) rely on information from a small number of randomized controlled trials that were performed decades ago, with mixed results. Moreover, research on the outcomes after implantations for secondary prevention of ICDs is limited. While dual-chamber devices offer theoretical advantage over single-chamber devices, dual-chamber ICDs (DC-ICDs) were announced not superior to single-chamber (SC-ICDs) in some research. Purpose Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the all-cause mortality among patients from the Polish ICD Registry receiving either a single- or a dual-chamber device for secondary prevention in contemporary clinical practice. Methods All patients enrolled in the Polish ICD Registry from 1995 to 2016 were identified. Patients were included in the study if they were designated as receiving an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD after documented tachycardic arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), or syncope. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess all-cause mortality. Results In the study population of 3596 ICD recipients (mean age 69±12 years, 81% male, SC-ICD 61%, DC-ICD 39%), during mean follow-up of 79±43 months all-cause mortality rate was higher in the dual-chamber group than in the single chamber group, with a significant difference between the two groups as depicted in Kaplan-Meier curve (p<0,05). The median survival time was 98 months versus 110 months for SC and DC-ICD, respectively. Conclusions This study is the first to describe the characteristics of a national cohort of patients receiving a secondary prevention ICD in such a long follow-up period in contemporary practice. Implantation of a dual-chamber ICD was associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with single chamber devices.

Download Full-text