scholarly journals Longterm oculomotor and visual function in spina bifida cystica: a population-based study

2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Caines ◽  
Margareta Dahl ◽  
Gerd Holmström
2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Appleton ◽  
P. E. Minchom ◽  
N. C. Ellis ◽  
C. E. Elliott ◽  
V. Böll ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 1674-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Peny-Dahlstrand ◽  
A-C Åhlander ◽  
L Krumlinde-Sundholm ◽  
G Gosman-Hedström

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav H. Haugen ◽  
Lise Nepstad ◽  
Odd Arne Standal ◽  
Irene Elgen ◽  
Trond Markestad

1989 ◽  
Vol 38 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Little ◽  
N.C. Nevin

AbstractIn a large population-based study in Northern Ireland during the period 1974-1979, the rate of anencephalus in twins (9.1/10,000) was found to be less than that in singletons (24.3/10,000). This finding is in contrast with most other studies and the possibility of underascertainment of twin cases is considered, but it is concluded that chance is the likeliest explanation. The rate of spina bifida in twins (36.4/10,000) was similar to that in singletons (31.9/10,000). All of the twins with anencephalus were female and from pairs of like sex. Rates of spina bifida in twins from pairs of the two sex types were similar but, unusually, there was a male preponderance. As in previous studies, the great majority of twins with NTDs had unaffected cotwins.


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Lena Hård ◽  
Aimon Niklasson ◽  
Elisabeth Svensson ◽  
Ann Hellström

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Lena Hård ◽  
Aimon Niklasson ◽  
Elisabeth Svensson ◽  
Ann Hellström

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dýrleif Pétursdóttir ◽  
Gerd Holmström ◽  
Eva Larsson

AimsTo assess visual function in young adults born preterm and compare with full-term individuals of the same age.MethodsYoung adults, born preterm (birth weight ≤1500 g) in 1988–1990, previously included in a population-based study on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in Stockholm County, Sweden were included. A control group of participants born at term, in the same area during the same time period, was used for comparison. Best-corrected visual acuities were assessed at distance and near with logMAR charts. Distance visual acuity was also measured with single symbols to calculate crowding. Visual fields were measured with Humphrey 24-2 and the mean deviation was noted. Contrast sensitivity was assessed with Vistech contrast sensitivity test and the area under the curve was calculated.ResultsFifty-nine preterm (females 37) and 44 full-term (females 18) individuals were included. All individuals were between 25 and 29 years of age. Preterm individuals had significantly lower distance visual acuity (mean −0.08 (SD 0.11) vs −0.14 (SD 0.07) logMAR, p=0.009), near visual acuity (mean −0.08 (SD 0.11) vs −0.13 (SD 0.06) logMAR, p=0.049), mean deviation (mean −1.09 (SD 1.13) vs −0.80 (SD 1.03) dB, p=0.05) and contrast sensitivity (mean 2.02 (SD 0.19) vs 2.16 (SD 0.14), p<0.001) in the better eye compared with full-term individuals. The differences in distance visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were also evident after excluding persons with previous ROP and neurological complications. In multivariable analyses, treated ROP was a risk factor for reduced near visual acuity and visual fields.ConclusionVisual function seems to be reduced in prematurely born individuals even in adulthood. The reason may be prematurity per se since individuals without previous ROP or neurological complications are also affected.SynopsisVisual function, assessed as visual acuity, visual fields and contrast sensitivity, was reduced in young adults born preterm and previously included in a population-based study on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity, as compared with controls.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document