Assembly rules are rare in SE Australian bird communities, but sometimes apply in fragmented agricultural landscapes

Ecography ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don A. Driscoll ◽  
David B. Lindenmayer
2020 ◽  
Vol 289 ◽  
pp. 106722 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gaüzère ◽  
L. Barbaro ◽  
F. Calatayud ◽  
K. Princé ◽  
V. Devictor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas M. Leveau

Abstract Background The analysis of bird community assembly rules is fundamental to understand which mechanisms determine the composition of bird species in urban areas. However, the long-term variation of community assembly rules has not been analyzed yet. The objectives of this study are (1) to analyze the variation of community assembly rules along rural-urban gradients of three cities in central Argentina and (2) to compare the patterns of community assembly between two periods separated by 6 years. Bird surveys were performed along transects in urban, suburban, and rural habitats during 2011 and 2017. Departures from null models that took into account differences in species richness (standardized effect size, SES) were calculated for functional and phylogenetic diversities. Results A total of 57 species were recorded. Bird species richness was higher in suburban than in urban and rural habitats. SES of functional diversity increased over the years and was significantly lower in urban habitats than in rural habitats, showing a pattern of functional clustering in the most urbanized areas and functional randomness in rural ones. Phylogenetic diversity was higher in both suburban and urban habitats than rural ones, and the phylogenetic clustering in rural bird assemblages changed to randomness in suburban and urban habitats. Conclusions Bird communities in urban habitats were phylogenetically random and functionally clustered, evidencing environmental filtering by urbanization. In contrast, bird communities in rural areas tended to be phylogenetically clustered, evidencing that certain clades are adapted to rural areas. The processes structuring bird communities along rural-urban gradients were consistent between the 2 years compared.


2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Pakeman ◽  
R. J. Pakeman ◽  
S. A. Hinsley ◽  
S. A. Hinsley ◽  
P. E. Bellamy ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e1453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan S. Sánchez-Oliver ◽  
José M. Rey Benayas ◽  
Luis M. Carrascal

Afforestation programs such as the one promoted by the EU Common Agricultural Policy have spread tree plantations on former cropland. These afforestations attract generalist forest and ubiquitous species but may cause severe damage to open habitat species, especially birds of high conservation value. We investigated the effects of young (<20 yr) tree plantations dominated by pineP. halepensison bird communities inhabiting the adjacent open farmland habitat in central Spain. We hypothesize that pine plantations located at shorter distances from open fields and with larger surface would affect species richness and conservation value of bird communities. Regression models controlling for the influence of land use types around plantations revealed positive effects of higher distance to pine plantation edge on community species richness in winter, and negative effects on an index of conservation concern (SPEC) during the breeding season. However, plantation area did not have any effect on species richness or community conservation value. Our results indicate that the effects of pine afforestation on bird communities inhabiting Mediterranean cropland are diluted by heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Padoa-Schioppa ◽  
Marco Baietto ◽  
Renato Massa ◽  
Luciana Bottoni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document