SOP: Physical Examination and Laboratory Testing for Men with Erectile Dysfunction

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein M. Ghanem ◽  
Andrea Salonia ◽  
Antonio Martin-Morales
Author(s):  
Yukiko Kimura ◽  
Taunton R. Southwood

This chapter presents a systematic approach to evaluating the limping child, beginning with a careful history, then the physical examination, and proceeding to the musculoskeletal examination followed by targeted investigations. Tables with useful tips for differential diagnosis based on age and laboratory testing, as well as diagnostic algorithms, are presented.


Author(s):  
Gembong Satria Mahardhika ◽  
Nastiti Maharani ◽  
Theodore Dharma Tedjamartono ◽  
Efriadi Ismail

Coronavirus Diesease-2019 (COVID-19) infection is suspected to affect the sexual behavior and function. The vascular damage related to COVID-19 can affect the impairment of bed blood vessel of penile and finally make the erectile dysfunction (ED). This problem is one of the most common sexual problem in man, with the prevalantion between 13 until 28% at the 40-80 years old, and the incidence increases with higher age. At this time, no data about the effect of COVID-19 to sexual behavior. There was one case of COVID-19 with erectile dysfunction who was treated at Kemayoran Athletes Village COVID-19 hospital. Erectile dysfunction is influenced by several factors; including psychogenic, neurogenic, and infectious. The diagnosis of erectile dysfunction is determined based on the results of history taking and physical examination, using the standard questionnaire (IIEF-5/International index of erectile function-5). A further review is needed to exclude a particular cause, the management can be determined based on the etiology.


Author(s):  
Yukiko Kimura ◽  
Taunton R. Southwood

This chapter presents a systematic approach to evaluating the limping child, beginning with a careful history, then the physical examination, and proceeding to the musculoskeletal examination followed by targeted investigations. Tables with useful tips for differential diagnosis based on age and laboratory testing, as well as diagnostic algorithms, are presented.


Author(s):  
Raymond S. Douglas ◽  
Robert A. Goldberg

Although orbital disorders are not frequently encountered in the comprehensive ophthalmologist’s practice, it is essential to be able to diagnose patients with orbital disease and manage them accordingly. Various disease processes can affect the orbit. This chapter endeavors to provide a thoughtful, stepwise, and logical approach to the evaluation of orbital disease. The discussion begins with differential diagnosis, adds an intelligent history-taking and physical examination, and then focuses on efficient use of diagnostic tests to finally arrive at the correct diagnosis. The staging and management of two common orbital disorders, orbital inflammation and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, will also be discussed. The differential diagnosis of orbital disease is extensive, and most listings of orbital disease divide the causes between histopathologic and mechanistic categories. This type of grouping is intellectually sound and scientifically useful but does not provide a framework that the clinical practitioner can easily grasp and directly use in sorting through the differential diagnosis of any given patient. In broad terms, orbital disease can be considered in terms of location, extent, and biologic activity. The classification used in this chapter is broken down along clinical lines and takes advantage of the fact that the orbit has a somewhat limited repertoire of ways that it can respond to pathologic conditions. Orbital disease can be categorized into five basic clinical patterns: inflammatory, mass effect, structural, vascular, and functional. Although many cases cross over into several categories, the vast majority of clinical presentations fit predominantly into one of these patterns. As the clinician walks through each step of the evaluation process—history, physical examination, laboratory testing, orbital imaging—a conscious effort should be made to categorize the presentation within this framework. If the practitioner approaches orbital disease with this framework of discrete patterns of clinical presentation, then at every step of the diagnostic pathway (history, physical examination, orbital imaging studies, and special tests), he or she can draw from a defined set of differential diagnoses that characterize each pattern of orbital disease and use that information to efficiently and confidently orchestrate diagnosis and management.


Urology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Davis-Joseph ◽  
Leonore Tiefer ◽  
Arnold Melman ◽  
Richard E. Berger

Psoriatic arthritis is an uncommon, chronic inflammatory disease. Laboratory testing for psoriatic arthritis is generally inconclusive. We present a case of a 26 year-old female with plantar forefoot pain and swelling that was diagnosed as psoriatic arthritis by both a podiatric physician and rheumatologist without the benefit of definitive laboratory results or skin changes. One must maintain a high index of suspicion based on the history and physical examination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document