SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF FEEDING ACTIVITY IN THE WILD HOUSE-MOUSE (MUS MUSCULUS L.)

1959 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER CROWCROFT
1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. P. Rowe ◽  
A. Bradfield ◽  
R. J. Quy ◽  
T. Swinney

1973 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Haines ◽  
Carolyn Ciskowski ◽  
Verna Harms

Nature ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 204 (4963) ◽  
pp. 1099-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. HEINECKE ◽  
M. WAGNER

Animals ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Shannon Sked ◽  
Chaofeng Liu ◽  
Salehe Abbar ◽  
Robert Corrigan ◽  
Richard Cooper ◽  
...  

The house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, creates significant public health risks for residents in low-income multi-family dwellings (MFDs). This study was designed to evaluate the spatial distribution of house mice in MFDs. Four low-income high-rise apartment buildings in three cities in New Jersey were selected for building-wide monitoring on two occasions with approximately one year between the monitoring events. The presence of a house mouse infestation was determined by placing mouse bait stations with three different non-toxic baits for a one-week period in all accessible units as well as common areas. Permutation tests were conducted to evaluate house mouse infestation spatial patterns. All four analyzed buildings exhibited a significant correlation between apartments with house mouse infestations and whether they share a common wall or ceiling/floor at both sampling periods except one building during the second inspection, which contained a high number of isolated apartments. Foraging ranges, speed of locomotion, and dispersal behavior of house mice are relatively larger, faster, and more common, respectively, compared to common urban arthropod pests. This could lead to the conclusion that house mice are as likely to infest non-neighboring apartments as those that share a wall or floor/ceiling. However, these results demonstrate that house mouse infestations tend to occur among apartments that share common walls or ceilings/floors. This spatial distribution pattern can be utilized in rodent management plans to improve the efficiency of house mouse management programs in MFDs.


Development ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-159
Author(s):  
Hans Grüneberg

The teeth of mammals have been studied in great detail both by palaeontologists and by taxonomists who are interested in differences between species or higher systematic categories which are ultimately genetic in nature. By contrast, little is known about intra-specific genetic variability of the dentition. An invitation to participate in an ‘Institute for Advanced Education in Dental Research’ sponsored by the American College of Dentists provided an occasion to explore the situation in the laboratory and, presently, in the wild house mouse. The main results of this search are given in this paper. The extent of the intra-specific variance discovered may help systematists in assessing how much importance to attach to the differences they encounter; and it will be shown how easily one can be misled, in a limited sample, as to what is ‘normal’. Two characteristic dental syndromes to be described pose a new kind of problem to dental pathology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document