scholarly journals Commentary: What conflicts of interest tell us about autism intervention research—a commentary on Bottema‐Beutel et al. (2020)

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-18
Author(s):  
Michelle Dawson ◽  
Sue Fletcher‐Watson
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Autism Intervention

A Trend Analysis of Participant and Setting Characteristics in Autism Intervention Research

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Crosland ◽  
Shelley Clarke ◽  
Glen Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Trend Analysis ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Autism Intervention

Autism Intervention Research: From the Reviews to Implications for Practice

2009 ◽  
pp. 195-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanny F.N. Freeman ◽  
Tanya Paparella ◽  
Kelly Stickles
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Research ◽  
Autism Intervention

The Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health and the Autism Speaks Autism Treatment Network

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S67-S71 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Perrin ◽  
D. L. Coury ◽  
K. Klatka ◽  
B. Winklosky ◽  
A. Wolfe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Health ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Treatment Network ◽  
Autism Treatment ◽  
Autism Intervention

scholarly journals Conflicts of interest are under-reported in autism early intervention research

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
The Usa ◽  
First Time

Researchers in the USA have studied, for the first time, the types, prevalence and effects of conflicts of interest (COI) in autism early intervention research.

scholarly journals Piloting autism intervention research with teachers in mainstream classrooms

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1228-1244
Author(s):  
Libby Macdonald ◽  
Deb Keen ◽  
Jill Ashburner ◽  
Debra Costley ◽  
Kaaren Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Research ◽  
Mainstream Classrooms ◽  
Autism Intervention

scholarly journals Research Review: Conflicts of Interest (COIs) in autism early intervention research – a meta‐analysis of COI influences on intervention effects

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Bottema‐Beutel ◽  
Shannon Crowley ◽  
Micheal Sandbank ◽  
Tiffany G. Woynaroski
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Intervention Effects

scholarly journals Participant characteristics in autism intervention studies

Autism ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarabeth Broder-Fingert ◽  
Christine Silva ◽  
Michael Silverstein ◽  
Emily Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Culturally Diverse ◽  
Intervention Studies ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Autism Intervention ◽  
Culturally Diverse Families ◽  
Participant Characteristics

The purpose of this Letter to the Editor is to discuss the recent paper, “Lessons learned: Engaging culturally diverse families in neurodevelopmental disorders intervention research” by Ratto et al. Specifically, we are interested in further exploring the question of “who participates in autism spectrum disorder intervention research,” and how this question may impact interpretation of Ratto and colleagues’ paper.

The Autism Treatment Network and Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health: Future Directions

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. S198-S201 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Perrin ◽  
Daniel L. Coury ◽  
Nancy Jones ◽  
Clara Lajonchere
Keyword(s):  
Physical Health ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Treatment Network ◽  
Autism Treatment ◽  
Autism Intervention

scholarly journals Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Leadbitter ◽  
Karen Leneh Buckle ◽  
Ceri Ellis ◽  
Martijn Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Intervention Research ◽  
Self Advocacy ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Autism Intervention ◽  
Autistic People ◽  
Theory Research

The growth of autistic self-advocacy and the neurodiversity movement has brought about new ethical, theoretical and ideological debates within autism theory, research and practice. These debates have had genuine impact within some areas of autism research but their influence is less evident within early intervention research. In this paper, we argue that all autism intervention stakeholders need to understand and actively engage with the views of autistic people and with neurodiversity as a concept and movement. In so doing, intervention researchers and practitioners are required to move away from a normative agenda and pay diligence to environmental goodness-of-fit, autistic developmental trajectories, internal drivers and experiences, and autistic prioritized intervention targets. Autism intervention researchers must respond to these debates by reframing effectiveness, developing tools to measure autistic prioritized outcomes, and forming partnerships with autistic people. There is a pressing need for increased reflection and articulation around how intervention practices align with a neurodiversity framework and greater emphasis within intervention programmes on natural developmental processes, coping strategies, autonomy, and well-being.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document