Evaluation of the influence of implant placement timing on the esthetic outcomes of single tooth implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himanshu Arora ◽  
Saso Ivanovski
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

scholarly journals Long-term Stability of Soft Tissue Esthetic Outcomes Following Conventional Single Implant Treatment in the Anterior Maxilla: 10-12 Year Results

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 602-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Rokn ◽  
SH Bassir ◽  
AA Rasouli Ghahroudi ◽  
MJ Kharazifard ◽  
R Manesheof
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Term Stability ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement ◽  
Implant Treatment

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term stability of esthetic outcomes of soft tissue around maxillary anterior single-tooth implants after 10-to-12 years of loading. Methods: Patients who had been treated for single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla between February 2000 and July 2002 were invited to participate in the study. All implants had been placed according to delayed implant placement and conventional loading protocols without any connective tissue graft or papilla preservation flaps. Pink Esthetic Score (PES) was rated using standardized clinical photographs to assess the esthetic outcomes of the implant treatment at the time of crown placement and at time of follow-up examination which was at least 10 years after the crown placement. Results: A total of 19 patients were included. The mean score of PES was 11.63 (SD 1.61; range 7-14) at baseline. After 10-to-12 years of function, a mean PES score of 11.05 (SD 2.09; range 6–14) was recorded. No significant differences were found in the esthetic outcomes, categorized based on clinically relevant levels, between the baseline and follow-up session (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within limitation of the present study, it can be concluded that the esthetic outcomes of soft tissue around the maxillary anterior single-tooth implants placed using conventional implant placement technique remained stable in the long-term.

A retrospective study on survival rate of the most posterior single tooth implant

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Woo Jung ◽  
Jae-Kwan Lee ◽  
Heung-Sik Um ◽  
Beom-Seok Chang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

“THE PROSTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF UNFAVOURABLE POSITIONED IMPLANT IN ANTERIOR MAXILLA”- A CASE REPORT.

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Deepika Sharma ◽  
Tarun Gaur ◽  
Karunakaran Keshav
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Successful Treatment ◽  
Bone Thickness ◽  
Facial Bone ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Good Treatment Option ◽  
Implant Treatment

With the advancement in the dental implant treatment, many new innovative improvements have been developed in the designs and components of implants. These improvements helps to handle the compromising situations where sometimes the good treatment option can become more challenging. One of the such grueling condition is implant placement in the anterior maxilla where dentist has to fulll both aesthetic and functional demand. Many aesthetic failures of implant have been reported in the literature in the anterior maxilla. One of them is placing implant in sites with deciency of facial bone thickness which sometimes resulted in malposition of implant. This case report discusses about the prosthodontic correction of malpositioned implant in the anterior maxilla by using castable abutment. The use of castable abutment is concluded as successful treatment option for complex misaligned and malposed single dental implant.

Restoration of the Soft-tissue Margin in Single-tooth Implant in the Anterior Maxilla

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 286-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamil Awad Shibli ◽  
Susana d'Avila
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Soft Tissue Defect ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Grafting Technique ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Implant Restoration ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

Abstract Esthetic requirements for dental implant restoration have arisen in recent years. Despite several surgical techniques that have been developed, the treatment of the peri-implant soft-tissue defect is still difficult. The purpose of this clinical article is to describe a grafting technique using subepithelial connective tissue grafts to recontour soft-tissue margin discrepancy for single-tooth implant restorations in the anterior maxilla. After 2-year follow-up, this procedure shows that the use of connective tissue grafts can be a predictable approach to establish new and stable peri-implant soft-tissue margin.

Single-Tooth Implant Restorations: A Retrospective Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J. Dhanrajani ◽  
Mohammed A. Al-Rafee
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

Esthetic Evaluation of Single-Tooth Morse Taper Connection Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets or Healed Sites

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco G. Mangano ◽  
Carlo Mangano ◽  
Massimiliano Ricci ◽  
Rachel L. Sammons ◽  
Jamil A. Shibli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Gingival Biotype ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Single Implant

The aim of this study was to compare the esthetic outcome of single implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with those placed in fully healed sites of the anterior maxilla. This retrospective study was based on data from patients treated with single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and in fully healed sites of the anterior maxilla. Only single implant treatments were considered with both neighboring teeth present. Additional prerequisites for immediate implant treatment were intact socket walls and a thick gingival biotype. The esthetic outcome was objectively rated using the pink esthetic/white esthetic score (PES/WES). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the PES and the WES between the 2 groups. Twenty-two patients received an immediate implant, and 18 patients had conventional implant surgery. The mean follow-up was 31.09 months (SD 5.57; range 24–46) and 34.44 months (SD 7.10; range 24–48) for immediately and conventionally inserted implants, respectively. No implants were lost. All implants fulfilled the success criteria. The mean PES/WES was 14.50 (SD 2.52; range 9–19) and 15.61 (SD 3.20; range 8–20) for immediately and conventionally placed implants, respectively. Immediate implants had a mean PES of 7.45 (SD 1.62; range 4–10) and a mean WES of 7.04 (SD 1.29; range 5–10). Conventional implants had a mean PES of 7.83 (SD 1.58; range 4–10) and a mean WES of 7.77 (SD 1.66; range 4–10). The difference between the 2 groups was not significant. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment yielded comparable esthetic outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document