3D printed implant surgical guides with internally routed irrigation for temperature reduction during osteotomy preparation: A pilot study

Author(s):  
Sorin Teich ◽  
Michael Bocklet ◽  
Zachary Evans ◽  
Zvi Gutmacher ◽  
Walter Renne
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 391
Author(s):  
Rani D’haese ◽  
Tom Vrombaut ◽  
Geert Hommez ◽  
Hugo De Bruyn ◽  
Stefan Vandeweghe

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the accuracy of implant position using mucosal supported surgical guides, produced by a desktop 3D printer. Methods: Ninety implants (Bone Level Roxolid, 4.1 mm × 10 mm, Straumann, Villerat, Switzerland) were placed in fifteen mandibular casts (Bonemodels, Castellón de la Plana, Spain). A mucosa-supported guide was designed and printed for each of the fifteen casts. After placement of the implants, the location was assessed by scanning the cast and scan bodies with an intra-oral scanner (Primescan®, Dentsply Sirona, York, PA, USA). Two comparisons were performed: one with the mucosa as a reference, and one where only the implants were aligned. Angular, coronal and apical deviations were measured. Results: The mean implant angular deviation for tissue and implant alignment were 3.25° (SD 1.69°) and 2.39° (SD 1.42°) respectively, the coronal deviation 0.82 mm (SD 0.43 mm) and 0.45 mm (SD 0.31 mm) and the apical deviation 0.99 mm (SD 0.45 mm) and 0.71 mm (SD 0.43 mm). All three variables were significantly different between the tissue and implant alignment (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, we conclude that guided implant surgery using desktop 3D printed mucosa-supported guides has a clinically acceptable level of accuracy. The resilience of the mucosa has a negative effect on the guide stability and increases the deviation in implant position.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Postl ◽  
Thomas Mücke ◽  
Stefan Hunger ◽  
Oliver Bissinger ◽  
Michael Malek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The accuracy of computer-assisted biopsies at the lower jaw was compared to the accuracy of freehand biopsies. Methods Patients with a bony lesion of the lower jaw with an indication for biopsy were prospectively enrolled. Two customized bone models per patient were produced using a 3D printer. The models of the lower jaw were fitted into a phantom head model to simulate operation room conditions. Biopsies for the study group were taken by means of surgical guides and freehand biopsies were performed for the control group. Results The deviation of the biopsy axes from the planning was significantly less when using templates. It turned out to be 1.3 ± 0.6 mm for the biopsies with a surgical guide and 3.9 ± 1.1 mm for the freehand biopsies. Conclusions Surgical guides allow significantly higher accuracy of biopsies. The preliminary results are promising, but clinical evaluation is necessary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 519-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Hromadnik ◽  
Stefano Pieralli ◽  
Benedikt Spies ◽  
Florian Beuer ◽  
Christian Wesemann

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 4581-4584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengping Wang ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Xuejun Peng ◽  
Jing Su

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beom Seok Ko ◽  
Namkug Kim ◽  
Jong Won Lee ◽  
Hee Jeong Kim ◽  
Il-Young Chung ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 821-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Yeung ◽  
Aous Abdulmajeed ◽  
Caroline K. Carrico ◽  
George R. Deeb ◽  
Sompop Bencharit

2018 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Garas ◽  
Mauro Vaccarezza ◽  
George Newland ◽  
Kylie McVay-Doornbusch ◽  
Jamila Hasani

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Alperen Yilmaz ◽  
Adel F. Badria ◽  
Pinar Yilgor Huri ◽  
Gazi Huri
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document