Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Transport Based on Forest Biomass

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhawna Singh ◽  
Geoffrey Guest ◽  
Ryan M. Bright ◽  
Anders Hammer Strømman
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki MAEDA ◽  
Tadao MORO ◽  
Yasunari MATSUNO ◽  
Masayuki SAGISAKA ◽  
Atsushi INABA

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-502
Author(s):  
S. M. Shafie ◽  
Z. Othman ◽  
N. Hami ◽  
S. Omar ◽  
A. H. Nu'man ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dyah Ika Rinawati ◽  
Alexander Ryota Keeley ◽  
Shutaro Takeda ◽  
Shunsuke Managi

Abstract This study conducted a systematic literature review of the technical aspects and methodological choices in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of using hydrogen for road transport. More than 70 scientific papers published during 2000–2021 were reviewed, in which more than 350 case studies of use of hydrogen in the automotive sector were found. Only some studies used hybrid LCA and energetic input-output LCA, whereas most studies addressed attributional process-based LCA. A categorization based on the life cycle scope distinguished case studies that addressed the well-to-tank (WTT), well-to-wheel (WTW), and complete life cycle approaches. Furthermore, based on the hydrogen production process, these case studies were classified into four categories: thermochemical, electrochemical, thermal-electrochemical, and biochemical. Moreover, based on the hydrogen production site, the case studies were classified as centralized, on-site, and on-board. The fuel cell vehicle passenger car was the most commonly used vehicle. The functional unit for the WTT studies was mostly mass or energy, and vehicle distance for the WTW and complete life cycle studies. Global warming potential (GWP) and energy consumption were the most influential categories. Apart from the GREET (Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation) model and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for assessing the GWP, the Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden method was most widely used in other impact categories. Most of the articles under review were comparative LCA studies on different hydrogen pathways and powertrains. The findings provide baseline data not only for large-scale applications, but also for improving the efficiency of hydrogen use in road transport.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Khzouz ◽  
Evangelos Gkanas ◽  
Jia Shao ◽  
Farooq Sher ◽  
Dmytro Beherskyi ◽  
...  

This work investigates life cycle costing analysis as a tool to estimate the cost of hydrogen to be used as fuel for Hydrogen Fuel Cell vehicles (HFCVs). The method of life cycle costing and economic data are considered to estimate the cost of hydrogen for centralised and decentralised production processes. In the current study, two major hydrogen production methods are considered, methane reforming and water electrolysis. The costing frameworks are defined for hydrogen production, transportation and final application. The results show that hydrogen production via centralised methane reforming is financially viable for future transport applications. The ownership cost of HFCVs shows the highest cost among other costs of life cycle analysis.


GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 728-741
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Quinn ◽  
HakSoo Ha ◽  
Timothy A. Volk ◽  
Tristan R. Brown ◽  
Steven Bick ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 125086
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Usai ◽  
Christine Roxanne Hung ◽  
Felipe Vásquez ◽  
Max Windsheimer ◽  
Odne Stokke Burheim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Gaudreault ◽  
T. Bently Wigley ◽  
Manuele Margni ◽  
Jake Verschuyl ◽  
Kirsten Vice ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document