scholarly journals Life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies

Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar ◽  
Marco Raugei ◽  
Bernhard Steubing ◽  
Anthony Hartwell ◽  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1310-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Mohr ◽  
Jens F. Peters ◽  
Manuel Baumann ◽  
Marcel Weil

2020 ◽  
pp. 0734242X2096663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuoyao Wang ◽  
Jeongsoo Yu

China has become the largest electric vehicle (EV) market in the world since 2015. Consequently, the lithium-ion battery (LiB) market in China is also expanding fast. LiB makers are continually introducing new types of LiBs into the market to improve LiBs’ performance. However, there will be a considerable amount of waste LiBs generated in China. These waste LiBs should be appropriately recycled to avoid resources’ waste or environmental pollution problems. Yet, because LiBs’ type keeps changing, the environmental impact and profitability of the waste LiB recycling industry in China become uncertain. In this research, we reveal the detailed life cycle process of EVs’ LiBs in China first. Then, the environmental impact of each type of LiB is speculated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. Moreover, we clarify how LiBs’ evolution will affect the economic effect of the waste battery recycling industry in China. We perform a sensitivity analysis focusing on waste LiBs’ collection rate. We found that along with LiBs’ evolution, their environmental impact is decreasing. Furthermore, if waste LiBs could be appropriately recycled, their life cycle environmental impact would be further dramatically decreased. On the other hand, the profitability of the waste battery recycling industry in China would decrease in the future. Moreover, it is essential to improve waste LiBs’ collection rate to establish an efficient waste LiB industry. Such a trend should be noticed by the Chinese government and waste LiB recycling operators to establish a sustainable waste LiB recycling industry in the future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 599-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelin Deng ◽  
Lulu Ma ◽  
Tonghui Li ◽  
Jianyang Li ◽  
Chris Yuan

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen ◽  
Guillaume Majeau-Bettez ◽  
Bhawna Singh ◽  
Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava ◽  
Lars Ole Valøen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang ◽  
Gu ◽  
Guo ◽  
Chen

Mobile power bank (MPB) is an emerging consumer electronic that stores and delivers electricity to other electronics. Nowadays, MPBs are produced and discarded in massive quantities, yet their environmental impacts have never been quantitatively evaluated. Employing a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, this study assesses the life cycle environmental impacts of MPBs, with a specific focus on comparing the environmental performance of different MPBs that are based on two types of batteries, namely, lithium-ion battery (LIB) and lithium-ion polymer battery (LIPB). The results suggest that battery production is the greatest contributor to the environmental impacts of both MPBs. LIPB based MPB is environmentally friendlier due to its higher energy density and longer cycle life. In addition, it is found that recycling can reduce the environmental burden of MPB industry as well as ease the vast depletion of metals such as cobalt and copper. The sensitivity analysis shows that figuring out an optimal retirement point and using less carbon-intensive electricity can reduce the climate change potential of MPBs. This study provides recommendations to further improve the environmental performance of MPB, including the usage of more sustainable cathode materials, market promoting direction, and formulation of end-of-life management policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 101230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Le Varlet ◽  
Oliver Schmidt ◽  
Ajay Gambhir ◽  
Sheridan Few ◽  
Iain Staffell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document