Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for cancer‐related pain, fatigue, and sleep disorders in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author(s):  
Juejin Li ◽  
Chuanmei Zhu ◽  
Chunhua Liu ◽  
Yonglin Su ◽  
Xingchen Peng ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552095102
Author(s):  
Diyang Lyu ◽  
Jichen Wang ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Weijiao Zhang ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the state of evidence for the beneficial and harmful effects of Tai Chi on non-motor disorders in post-stroke patients. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Subjects: Stroke survivors who received conventional rehabilitation therapy or Tai Chi training. Data sources: We searched seven electronic literature databases and one clinical registry platform to collect data from randomized controlled trials published up to July 26, 2020. Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials with 723 stroke survivors met the inclusion criteria, of which six were included in the meta-analysis. Among the 11 studies, one was assessed as “low”, eight were assessed as “moderate”, and only two were assessed as “high” for the assessment of methodologic quality. Compared to patients who received conventional rehabilitation therapy, those who received Tai Chi training showed greater improvement in scores of depression (standardized mean difference (SMD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.36 [0.10, 0.61], Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE]: very low). There were no differences in the improvements in post-stroke global mental disorders (mean difference (MD [95% CI] = 6.15 [−3.05, 15.36], GRADE: moderate) or sleep disorders (MD [95% CI] = 0.33 [−1.51, 1.81], GRADE: low) between Tai Chi and control groups. Conclusion: Tai Chi may alleviate post-stroke depression in stroke survivors but has no clear effects on post-stroke cognitive and sleep disorders.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci

BackgroundHarmful alcohol use leads to a large burden of disease and disability which disportionately impacts LMICs. The World Health Organization and the Lancet have issued calls for this burden to be addressed, but issues remain, primarily due to gaps in information. While a variety of interventions have been shown to be effective at reducing alcohol use in HICs, their efficacy in LMICs have yet to be assessed. This systematic review describes the current published literature on alcohol interventions in LMICs and conducts a meta analysis of clinical trials evaluating interventions to reduce alcohol use and harms in LMICs.MethodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines we searched the electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus,Web of Science, Cochrane, and Psych Info. Articles were eligible if they evaluated an intervention targeting alcohol-related harm in LMICs. After a reference and citation analysis, we conducted a quality assessment per PRISMA protocol. A meta-analysis was performed on the 39 randomized controlled trials that evaluated an alcohol-related outcome.ResultsOf the 3,801 articles from the literature search, 87 articles from 25 LMICs fit the eligibility and inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 39 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Nine of these studies focused specifically on medication, while the others focused on brief motivational intervention, brain stimulation, AUDIT-based brief interventions, WHO ASSIST-based interventions, group based education, basic screening and interventions, brief psychological or counseling, dyadic relapse prevention, group counseling, CBT, motivational + PTSD based interview, and health promotion/awareness. Conclusion Issues in determining feasible options specific to LMICs arise from unstandardized interventions, unequal geographic distribution of intervention implementation, and uncertain effectiveness over time. Current research shows that brain stimulation, psychotherapy, and brief motivational interviews have the potential to be effective in LMIC settings, but further feasibility testing and efforts to standardize results are necessary to accurately assess their effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document