Hybrid repair of aortic arch with zone zero endografting—Case series with review of the literature

Author(s):  
Petar Zlatanovic ◽  
Igor Koncar ◽  
Milos Sladojevic ◽  
Ivan Tomic ◽  
Perica Mutavdzic ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Varun J Sharma ◽  
Minesh Prakash ◽  
Zaw Lin ◽  
Casey Lo

Summary A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘in patients with ascending aortic or aortic arch disease what are the outcomes with endovascular repair in terms of survival, complications and reintervention?’ Altogether 585 papers were found using the reported search, of which 9 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We found that the endovascular operative techniques with the greatest evidence were ascending aortic chimney grafts (AACs), branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (bTEVAR) aortic grafts and fenestrated TEVAR (fTEVAR) aortic grafts. The best evidence available were small case-series or retrospective cohort studies (n < 100), with 1 systematic review, at a short follow-up period (range 0–5 years). Intraoperatively, these techniques have a high technical success rate (84–100%). We found rates of endoleak comparable between AAC (7.4–16%) and bTEVAR/fenestrated TEVAR (11.1–21.4%). Stroke rates are higher in bTEVAR (3.1–42% vs 1–26% in AACs), attributed to more proximal pathology and technically challenging procedures. Following the immediate postoperative period, the 30-day mortality is 0–10.8% and patency is 97–100%. Stroke and reintervention rates remain higher in the bTEVAR group (3.1–42.0% and 0.5–33.3%) compared to the AAC group (1.0–11.1% and 6.7–16.7%). The 3- and 5-year survival ranges from 59% to 90%, but is driven by non-aortic pathology in a high-risk population; 3-year freedom from aortic death is 93–97%. Patency is 97–100% at up to 3 years, conformation and supra-aortic occlusions thereafter remain unknown. We conclude that AACs, bTEVARs and fenestrated TEVARs are safe endovascular options in high-risk elective patients, with results comparable to open or hybrid repair. They remain unverified in acute settings or in patients fit for open intervention.


2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442110483
Author(s):  
Salomon Cohen-Mussali ◽  
Monica Leon ◽  
Claudio Ramírez-Cerda ◽  
Ernesto Cobos-Gonzalez ◽  
Jaime Valdes-Flores

Background: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can either present alone as an isolated condition or in association with other aortic arch or cardiac anomalies. One percent of patients with CoA have concomitant an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA). Purpose: We report the case of a 35-year-old woman with uncontrolled hypertension who was found to have CoA and ARSA. Results: The patient was treated successfully using a hybrid procedure comprising ARSA ligation and subclavian to carotid transposition, followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusions: Patients with CoA should be carefully studied, considering the possible coexistence of other congenital aortic arch defects, such as ARSA. Hybrid repair is a safe and effective approach for this condition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
D Reher ◽  
C Schramm ◽  
F Brinkert ◽  
A Lohse ◽  
C Weiler-Normann

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Yuka KUNIMI ◽  
Yasunori OHGA ◽  
Kotaro ITO ◽  
Shinichi HIROSE ◽  
Shinichi IMAFUKU

Pituitary ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Aranda ◽  
R. García ◽  
F. J. Guarda ◽  
F. Nilo ◽  
J. P. Cruz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 117955652110216
Author(s):  
Parisa Oviedo ◽  
Morgan Bliss

Objective: Masses of the sternoclavicular area are rare, and are not well described in the literature. We aim to present a series of patients with masses in this location and to review all reported English language cases of sternoclavicular masses in pediatric patients. Methods: This is a case series of pediatric patients with masses of the sternoclavicular area presenting to a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2010 through 2017. Data was collected by using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to query the electronic medical record. Chart review included age at presentation, mass characteristics, medical and surgical interventions, and pathology results. A review of the literature was then performed. Results: Ten patients with masses overlying the sternoclavicular area were identified. Four patients presented with abscess and were treated with incision and drainage. Three of these patients were then treated with staged excision once infection cleared. Two additional patients were treated with primary excision. Four patients were treated with observation. The most common histopathologic finding was epidermoid. One patient was found to have a dermoid cyst, and 1 had a congenital cartilaginous rest. Conclusion: Epidermoids and dermoids are the most common masses overlying the sternoclavicular area. Controversy remains regarding the embryologic origin of sternoclavicular masses. The differential for masses in this area also includes branchial remnants, bronchogenic cysts, ganglion cysts, or septic arthritis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document