Background:
Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of AMI. However, the benefit of CR has not been well studied in patients with SCAD.
Purpose:
Our objective was to compare the psychosocial and physiological characteristics and outcomes of CR in SCAD patients who participated in CR compared to those who did not.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD enrolled in the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from January 2010 through December 2014 who had completed questionnaires (n=354). Demographics, clinical characteristics, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression measure; PHQ-9), and details about participants’ CR participation and experience were collected via medical record review and questionnaires. Univariate analyses were performed to determine the differences between baseline characteristics and outcomes according to CR participation status.
Results:
Mean age of participants at time of SCAD was 46 ± 10 years; 95% were female. Seventy-six percent of participants participated in at least one CR session, and those users averaged 18 ± 12 sessions. A majority of CR participants reported physical and emotional benefits (82% and 75%, respectively). Of those who did not participate in CR, the primary reason was because their healthcare provider did not recommend CR (67%). Other reasons included inadequate transportation (12%), no insurance coverage (8%), cost (2%), no energy (2%), and being too ill (2%). On comparative analyses, CR participants had higher mean GAD-7 scores (4.9 vs. 3.9; p=0.03) and were more likely to increase their amount of exercise (p<0.01).
Conclusions:
Despite the well-known benefits of CR, in this international registry, only 76% of SCAD patients participated. Lack of recommendation for CR by a health care provider was the primary reason patients did not participate. The majority of patients reported benefits from CR. Higher GAD-7 scores were associated with CR participation, an interesting result requiring further evaluation in a larger or prospective cohort.