Health expenditure and health services utilization comparison of patients with type 2 diabetes on sodium–glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors: evidence from 2015 to 2016 medical expenditure panel survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-401
Author(s):  
Pranav M. Patel ◽  
Varun Vaidya
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Tat'yana Morgunova ◽  
Valentin Fadeev

This article is dedicated to the problem of glycaemic durability of drugs used in treatment of type 2 diabetes. The results of studies comparing durability of glycemic control as monotherapy or in combination of metformin with different drugs: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sulfonylurea, inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 are shown. The article discusses the results of original research and meta-analysis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Wan-Chin Ling ◽  
Cze-Ci Chan ◽  
Shao-Wei Chen ◽  
Wei-Yi Kao ◽  
Chien-Ying Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) reduced the risk of hard cardiovascular endpoints in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with/without established cardiovascular diseases. Whether SGLT2i is associated with a lower risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in T2DM patients is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the risk of new-onset AF associated with the use of SGLT2i compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) among a longitudinal cohort of diabetic patients. Methods: We used medical data from a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan, which included a total of 21,480 and 22,989 patients treated with SGLT2i and DPP4i, respectively, from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. We used propensity-score weighting to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up from the drug index date until the occurrence of new-onset AF, discontinuation of the index drug, or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. Results: Overall, 56%, 42%, and 2% of the patients were treated with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin, respectively. Most patients in the DPP4i group were prescribed with linagliptin (51%), followed by sitagliptin (24%), saxagliptin (13%), vildagliptin (8%) and alogliptin (4%). The use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of new-onset AF compared with DPP4i after propensity-score weighting [adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidential interval: 0.64-0.74; P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of new-onset AF compared with DPP4i across several subgroups including old age, the presence of congestive heart failure, cardiovascular disease, overweight patients, hemoglobin A1c 8%, and chronic kidney disease. The advantage of SGLT2i over DPP4i persisted with different SGLT2i (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin) and either low- or standard-dose SGLT2i. Conclusions: SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of new-onset AF compared with DPP4i among T2DM patients in real-world practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document