DNA barcodes and microsatellites: how they complement for species identification in the complex genus Tamarix (Tamaricaceae)

Author(s):  
Alejandro Terrones ◽  
Michelle Bank ◽  
Joaquín Moreno ◽  
Ana Juan
Genome ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 851-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Hajibabaei ◽  
Gregory AC Singer ◽  
Donal A Hickey

DNA barcoding has been recently promoted as a method for both assigning specimens to known species and for discovering new and cryptic species. Here we test both the potential and the limitations of DNA barcodes by analysing a group of well-studied organisms—the primates. Our results show that DNA barcodes provide enough information to efficiently identify and delineate primate species, but that they cannot reliably uncover many of the deeper phylogenetic relationships. Our conclusion is that these short DNA sequences do not contain enough information to build reliable molecular phylogenies or define new species, but that they can provide efficient sequence tags for assigning unknown specimens to known species. As such, DNA barcoding provides enormous potential for use in global biodiversity studies.Key words: DNA barcoding, species identification, primate, biodiversity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai‐bing Zhang ◽  
Meng‐di Hao ◽  
Cai‐qing Yang ◽  
Zhi‐yong Shi

Zootaxa ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 1691 (1) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. ALEX SMITH

The 5' end (Folmer or Barcode region) of cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) has been proposed as the gene region of choice for a standardized animal DNA barcode (Hebert et al. 2003). Concerns have been raised regarding the decision to utilize this particular mitochondrial gene region as a barcode. Nevertheless, widely divergent taxonomic groups have reported success using CO1 for both species identification and discovery. The utility of CO1 for barcoding amphibians was raised early on (Vences, et al. 2005) and concerns for this group were reported widely (Waugh 2007)—although some considered that the reporting of the concerns outstripped the data that had been analyzed at that point (Smith et al. 2008). Indeed, our analysis of CO1 for a small group of Holarctic amphibians was neither more difficult to generate nor to analyze than for other groups where we have utilized the technique.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. FOOTTIT ◽  
H. E. L. MAW ◽  
C. D. VON DOHLEN ◽  
P. D. N. HEBERT

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Chun SHI ◽  
Jin ZHANG ◽  
Jian-Ping HAN ◽  
Jing-Yuan SONG ◽  
Hui YAO ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 483-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Bucklin ◽  
Peter H. Wiebe ◽  
Sara B. Smolenack ◽  
Nancy J. Copley ◽  
Jason G. Beaudet ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. EBO.S6014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haseeb Ahmad Khan ◽  
Ibrahim Abdulwahid Arif ◽  
Mohammad Shobrak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document