How informative is vertebral development for the origin of lissamphibians?

2019 ◽  
Vol 307 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Danto ◽  
F. Witzmann ◽  
S. K. Kamenz ◽  
N. B. Fröbisch
1986 ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Bagnall ◽  
E. J. Sanders ◽  
S. J. Higgins ◽  
H. Leam ◽  
E. Cheung

2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Baker ◽  
Santiago Schnell ◽  
Philip K. Maini

Disruption of normal vertebral development results from abnormal formation and segmentation of the vertebral precursors, called somites. Somitogenesis, the sequential formation of a periodic pattern along the antero-posterior axis of vertebrate embryos, is one of the most obvious examples of the segmental patterning processes that take place during embryogenesis and also one of the major unresolved events in developmental biology. We review the most popular models of somite formation: Cooke and Zeeman's clock and wavefront model, Meinhardt's reaction-diffusion model and the cell cycle model of Stern and co-workers, and discuss the consistency of each in the light of recent experimental findings concerning FGF-8 signalling in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). We present an extension of the cell cycle model to take account of this new experimental evidence, which shows the existence of a determination front whose position in the PSM is controlled by FGF-8 signalling, and which controls the ability of cells to become competent to segment. We conclude that it is, at this stage, perhaps erroneous to favour one of these models over the others.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e0152586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marylène Danto ◽  
Florian Witzmann ◽  
Nadia B. Fröbisch

FEBS Letters ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 588 (24) ◽  
pp. 4543-4550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Tatsumi ◽  
Moe Takeda ◽  
Masaru Matsuda ◽  
Tohru Suzuki ◽  
Hayato Yokoi

Development ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
P. O'higgins ◽  
D. R. Johnson ◽  
T. J. McAndrew

Little work has been done on the skeletal system of allophenic mice (chimaeras). In this paper we re-examine the evidence presented for the clonal theory of vertebral development using quantitative methods which take account of variation. We conclude that the clonal theory is either an overly simplistic approximation of the real situation, or that the evidence so far given in its support is unsubstantiated.


Scientifica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip F. Giampietro

Congenital and idiopathic scoliosis represent disabling conditions of the spine. While congenital scoliosis (CS) is caused by morphogenic abnormalities in vertebral development, the cause(s) for idiopathic scoliosis is (are) likely to be varied, representing alterations in skeletal growth, neuromuscular imbalances, disturbances involving communication between the brain and spine, and others. Both conditions are characterized by phenotypic and genetic heterogeneities, which contribute to the difficulties in understanding their genetic basis that investigators face. Despite the differences between these two conditions there is observational and experimental evidence supporting common genetic mechanisms. This paper focuses on the clinical features of both CS and IS and highlights genetic and environmental factors which contribute to their occurrence. It is anticipated that emerging genetic technologies and improvements in phenotypic stratification of both conditions will facilitate improved understanding of the genetic basis for these conditions and enable targeted prevention and treatment strategies.


2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Winchester ◽  
A. d'A. Bellairs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document