Strontium stratigraphy of the Oligocene–Early Miocene shellbeds of the Kutch Basin, western India, and its implications

Lethaia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-395
Author(s):  
Saurav Dutta ◽  
Devapriya Chattopadhyay ◽  
Debarati Chattopadhyay ◽  
Sambuddha Misra ◽  
Alexandra V. Turchyn

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Kanishka Bose ◽  
Shiladri S. Das ◽  
Subhronil Mondal

Abstract Although taxonomically distinct, the Cenozoic pleurotomariids are the bottlenecked remnants of the Mesozoic members of the family in terms of morphology, with only conical forms surviving the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Here, we propose an updated classification scheme for the Cenozoic representatives of this group, based on data from the entire Cenozoic pleurotomariid fossil record. We consider all conventional as well as several new characters so that this scheme can readily help to distinguish Cenozoic pleurotomariid genera. Following the new classification scheme, a revision of the generic status of Cenozoic species previously assigned to ‘Pleurotomaria’ Defrance, 1826 is presented. Only a few Cenozoic pleurotomariid gastropods have been reported from the Indian subcontinent. Here we report four species from the Oligocene of the Kutch Basin and the early Miocene (Burdigalian) of the Dwarka Basin of Gujarat, western India, of which two are described as new: Perotrochus bermotiensis n. sp., Entemnotrochus kathiawarensis n. sp., Entemnotrochus cf. E. bianconii, and Entemnotrochus? sp. 1. UUID: http://zoobank.org/89b6ff67-2834-477f-862b-67691104aca4



2016 ◽  
Vol 312 ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arijit Ray ◽  
Kalyanbrata Hatui ◽  
Dalim Kumar Paul ◽  
Gautam Sen ◽  
S.K. Biswas ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
Sanjib K. Biswas ◽  
Kotha Mahender ◽  
Gaurav D. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  


2017 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailesh Agrawal ◽  
Poonam Verma ◽  
M.R. Rao ◽  
Rahul Garg ◽  
Vivesh V. Kapur ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Ansuya Bhandari ◽  
D. M. Mohabey ◽  
Sunil Bajpai ◽  
B. N. Tiwari ◽  
Martin Pickford
Keyword(s):  


2013 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Runcie P. Mathews ◽  
Suryakant M. Tripathi ◽  
Santanu Banerjee ◽  
Suryendu Dutta
Keyword(s):  






2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Angana Chaudhuri ◽  
Anirban Chatterjee ◽  
Santanu Banerjee ◽  
J.S. Ray

Abstract An integrated approach involving Sr–Nd isotope, trace and rare earth element analyses tracks multiple sources of the Mesozoic sediments of the Kutch Basin at the western continental margin of India. High (87Sr/86Sr)t (ratio at time of deposition), negative εNd and high concentrations of large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs) indicate the upper continental source. Ratios of Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf suggest sedimentary and felsic igneous sources of sediments. The moderate to high concentration of La, Th and Sc, light rare earth elements (LREE-) enrichment, weak negative Eu anomalies and the relationship between εNd(0) and Th/Sc indicate the dominantly felsic composition of source rocks. However, low contents of Th, low values of (87Sr/86Sr)t and depleted mantle model age TDM < 1600 Ma indicate input from a younger mafic source. Increasing concentrations of Zr, Hf and Nd isotopes and a gradual increase in mean TDM from the older to the younger formations indicate erosional unroofing at the source terrain. The increasing (87Sr/86Sr)t through time relates to increased weathering of the source rock. The overwhelmingly southwesterly palaeocurrent direction of current-generated sedimentary structures, and the mean TDM ages trace suggest source areas of the Kutch Basin to Precambrian rocks in the north and NE of this basin. The TDM ages highlight the dominance of late Palaeoproterozoic source rocks. Nd isotope composition indicates that Proterozoic rocks of Marwar Supergroup and Erinpura Granite, in particular, served as main sediment contributors for the Mesozoic sediments in Kutch. We therefore conclude that the Mesozoic sediments in the Kutch Basin are predominantly of late Palaeoproterozoic age with lesser inputs from rocks of early Mesoproterozoic and early Palaeoproterozoic age.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document