Above- and below-ground effects of plant diversity depend on species origin: an experimental test with multiple invaders

2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (3) ◽  
pp. 727-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Kuebbing ◽  
Aimée T. Classen ◽  
Nathan J. Sanders ◽  
Daniel Simberloff
GigaScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary N Harris ◽  
Mani Awale ◽  
Niyati Bhakta ◽  
Daniel H Chitwood ◽  
Anne Fennell ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Modern biological approaches generate volumes of multi-dimensional data, offering unprecedented opportunities to address biological questions previously beyond reach owing to small or subtle effects. A fundamental question in plant biology is the extent to which below-ground activity in the root system influences above-ground phenotypes expressed in the shoot system. Grafting, an ancient horticultural practice that fuses the root system of one individual (the rootstock) with the shoot system of a second, genetically distinct individual (the scion), is a powerful experimental system to understand below-ground effects on above-ground phenotypes. Previous studies on grafted grapevines have detected rootstock influence on scion phenotypes including physiology and berry chemistry. However, the extent of the rootstock's influence on leaves, the photosynthetic engines of the vine, and how those effects change over the course of a growing season, are still largely unknown. Results Here, we investigate associations between rootstock genotype and shoot system phenotypes using 5 multi-dimensional leaf phenotyping modalities measured in a common grafted scion: ionomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, morphometrics, and physiology. Rootstock influence is ubiquitous but subtle across modalities, with the strongest signature of rootstock observed in the leaf ionome. Moreover, we find that the extent of rootstock influence on scion phenotypes and patterns of phenomic covariation are highly dynamic across the season. Conclusions These findings substantially expand previously identified patterns to demonstrate that rootstock influence on scion phenotypes is complex and dynamic and underscore that broad understanding necessitates volumes of multi-dimensional data previously unmet.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangtai Wang ◽  
Richard Michalet ◽  
Ziyang Liu ◽  
Aifeng Guo ◽  
Xianhui Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Oikos ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. 1830-1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix May ◽  
Volker Grimm ◽  
Florian Jeltsch
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Inga Hiiesalu ◽  
Jitka Klimešová ◽  
Jiři Doležal ◽  
Ondřej Mudrák ◽  
Lars Götzenberger ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. De Boeck ◽  
C.M.H.M. Lemmens ◽  
B. Gielen ◽  
H. Bossuyt ◽  
S. Malchair ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne D Shepperd ◽  
Dale L Bartos ◽  
Stephen A Mata

Above- and below-ground characteristics were measured and compared for six sets of paired trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones on the Fishlake National Forest in central Utah. Three self-regenerating clones were compared with three non-regenerating clones and three pure aspen stands were compared with three mixed aspen-conifer stands. Regenerating clones had dense understories of younger aspen stems, which were not present in non-regenerating clones. Regenerating clones also had greater numbers of roots and greater total root surface area than non-regenerating clones. Aboveground biomass and growth of the aspen in mixed stands was less than that of pure stands. A corresponding difference in aspen root mass was not apparent, indicating that the decline of aspen in mixed stands had not yet affected the root system. Conifer height and basal area growth rates were clearly greater than those of aspen, suggesting that aspen will eventually disappear from these forests in the absence of stand-reinitiating disturbances.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seraina Lisa Cappelli ◽  
Luiz Domeignoz Horta ◽  
Viviana Loaiza ◽  
Anna-Liisa Laine

While the positive relationship between plant biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) is relatively well-established, far less in known about the extent to which this relationship is mediated via below-ground microbial responses to plant diversity. Limited evidence suggests that the diversity of soil microbial communities is sensitive to plant community structure, and that diverse soil microbial communities promote functions desired of sustainable food production systems such as enhanced carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Here, we discuss available evidence on how plant diversity could be utilized to purposefully guide soil biodiversity in agricultural systems that are typically depleted of biodiversity, and are notoriously sensitive to both biotic and abiotic stressors. We outline the direct and soil microbe-mediated mechanisms expected to promote a positive BEF relationship both above- and below-ground. Finally, we identify management schemes based on ecological theory and vast empirical support that can be utilized to maximize ecosystem functioning in agroecosystems via biodiversity implementation schemes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document