Effectiveness of A Body Shape Index (ABSI) in predicting chronic diseases and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ji ◽  
S. Zhang ◽  
R. An
Author(s):  
Julián F. Calderón-García ◽  
Raúl Roncero-Martín ◽  
Sergio Rico-Martín ◽  
Jorge M. De Nicolás-Jiménez ◽  
Fidel López-Espuela ◽  
...  

Introduction: The body roundness index (BRI) and a body shape index (ABSI) are novel anthropometric indices established to determine both the amount visceral adipose tissue and body fat. Objective: to investigate whether BRI and ABSI are better predictors of hypertension than body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) or waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science databases up until 31 December 2020. Results: The estimated pooled area under curve [AUC (95% CI)] for BRI [0.67 (0.65–0.70)] for the prediction of hypertension were superior to that of ABSI (0.58 (0.56–0.60)), similar to that of BMI [0.67 (0.64–0.69)], and lower than those WC [0.68 (0.66–0.70)] and WHtR [0.68 (0.66–0.71)]. Nevertheless, the difference of BRI compared to WC and WHtR in the context of predicting hypertension was non-significant. ABSI was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than BRI, BMI, WC and WHtR. Similar findings were observed with the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-SROC). There were no significant differences between subgroups according to type of population or diagnostic criteria of hypertension. The diagnostic odds ratio (dORs) proved that increased BRI and ABSI were related with an elevated hypertension risk. Conclusions: BRI and ABSI have discriminatory power for hypertension in adult women and men from different populations. Although, WHtR and WC provided the best performance when assessing hypertension, no significant differences were found for BRI. Finally, BRI was significantly better predictor of hypertension than ABSI.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jayedi ◽  
Sepideh Soltani ◽  
Mahdieh Sadat Zargar ◽  
Tauseef Ahmad Khan ◽  
Sakineh Shab-Bidar

AbstractObjectiveTo quantify the association of indices of central obesity, including waist circumference, hip circumference, thigh circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-thigh ratio, body adiposity index, and A body shape index, with the risk of all cause mortality in the general population, and to clarify the shape of the dose-response relations.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed and Scopus from inception to July 2019, and the reference lists of all related articles and reviews.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesProspective cohort studies reporting the risk estimates of all cause mortality across at least three categories of indices of central fatness. Studies that reported continuous estimation of the associations were also included.Data synthesisA random effects dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to assess linear trend estimations. A one stage linear mixed effects meta-analysis was used for estimating dose-response curves.ResultsOf 98 745 studies screened, 1950 full texts were fully reviewed for eligibility. The final analyses consisted of 72 prospective cohort studies with 2 528 297 participants. The summary hazard ratios were as follows: waist circumference (10 cm, 3.94 inch increase): 1.11 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.13, I2=88%, n=50); hip circumference (10 cm, 3.94 inch increase): 0.90 (0.81 to 0.99, I2=95%, n=9); thigh circumference (5 cm, 1.97 inch increase): 0.82 (0.75 to 0.89, I2=54%, n=3); waist-to-hip ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.20 (1.15 to 1.25, I2=90%, n=31); waist-to-height ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.24 (1.12 to 1.36, I2=94%, n=11); waist-to-thigh ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.21 (1.03 to 1.39, I2=97%, n=2); body adiposity index (10% increase): 1.17 (1.00 to 1.33, I2=75%, n=4); and A body shape index (0.005 unit increase): 1.15 (1.10 to 1.20, I2=87%, n=9). Positive associations persisted after accounting for body mass index. A nearly J shaped association was found between waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio and the risk of all cause mortality in men and women. A positive monotonic association was observed for waist-to-hip ratio and A body shape index. The association was U shaped for body adiposity index.ConclusionsIndices of central fatness including waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-thigh ratio, body adiposity index, and A body shape index, independent of overall adiposity, were positively and significantly associated with a higher all cause mortality risk. Larger hip circumference and thigh circumference were associated with a lower risk. The results suggest that measures of central adiposity could be used with body mass index as a supplementary approach to determine the risk of premature death.


Author(s):  
Marisa Garcia Rodrigues ◽  
José Daniel Rodrigues ◽  
Ana Teresa Pereira ◽  
Luís Filipe Azevedo ◽  
Pedro Pereira Rodrigues ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey C. Kabat ◽  
Xiaonan Xue ◽  
Victor Kamensky ◽  
Dorothy Lane ◽  
Jennifer W. Bea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Gomez-Peralta ◽  
Cristina Abreu ◽  
Margarita Cruz-Bravo ◽  
Elvira Alcarria ◽  
Gala Gutierrez-Buey ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paquito Bernard ◽  
Ahmed-Jérôme Romain ◽  
Johan Caudroit ◽  
Guillaume Chevance ◽  
Marion Carayol ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1966-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Consalvo ◽  
Jesse C. Krakauer ◽  
Nir Y. Krakauer ◽  
Antonio Canero ◽  
Mafalda Romano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document