scholarly journals Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-cong Zhang ◽  
Zi-fang Zhang ◽  
Zhao-han Wang ◽  
Jun-yao Cheng ◽  
Yun-chang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

scholarly journals Minimally invasive lateral approach for adult degenerative scoliosis: lessons learned

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armen R. Deukmedjian ◽  
Amir Ahmadian ◽  
Konrad Bach ◽  
Alexandros Zouzias ◽  
Juan S. Uribe
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Traditional Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Scoliosis Correction

Object Lateral minimally invasive thoracolumbar instrumentation techniques are playing an increasing role in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. However, there is a paucity of data in determining the ideal candidate for a lateral versus a traditional approach, and versus a hybrid construct. The objective of this study is to present a method for utilizing the lateral minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach for adult spinal deformity, provide clinical outcomes to validate our experience, and determine the limitations of lateral MIS for adult degenerative scoliosis correction. Methods Radiographic and clinical data were collected for patients who underwent surgical correction of adult degenerative scoliosis between 2007 and 2012. Patients were retrospectively classified by degree of deformity based on coronal Cobb angle, central sacral vertical line (CSVL), pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), presence of comorbidities, bone quality, and curve flexibility. Patients were placed into 1 of 3 groups according to the severity of deformity: “green” (mild), “yellow” (moderate), and “red” (severe). Clinical outcomes were determined by a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results Of 256 patients with adult degenerative scoliosis, 174 underwent a variant of the lateral approach. Of these 174 patients, 27 fit the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 9 in each of the 3 groups). Surgery in 17 patients was dictated by their category, and 10 were treated with surgery outside of their classification. The average age was 61 years old and the mean follow-up duration was 17 months. The green and yellow groups experienced a reduction in coronal Cobb angle (12° and 11°, respectively), and slight changes in CSVL, SVA, and PT, and LL. In the green group, the VAS and ODI improved by 35 and 17 points, respectively, while in the yellow group they improved by 36 and 33 points, respectively. The red subgroup showed a 22° decrease in coronal Cobb angle, 15° increase in LL, and slight changes in PT and SVA. Three patients placed in the yellow subgroup had “green” surgery, and experienced a coronal Cobb angle and LL decrease by 17° and 10°, respectively, and an SVA and PT increase by 1.3 cm and 5°, respectively. Seven patients placed in the red group who underwent “yellow” or “green” surgery had a reduction in coronal Cobb angle of 16°, CSVL of 0.1 cm, SVA of 2.8 cm, PT of 4°, VAS of 28 points, and ODI of 12 points; lumbar lordosis increased by 15°. Perioperative complications included 1 wound infection, transient postoperative thigh numbness in 2 cases, and transient groin pain in 1 patient. Conclusions Careful patient selection is important for the application of lateral minimally invasive techniques for adult degenerative scoliosis. Isolated lateral interbody fusion with or without instrumentation is suitable for patients with preserved spinopelvic harmony. Moderate sagittal deformity (compensated with pelvic retroversion) may be addressed with advanced derivatives of the lateral approach, such as releasing the anterior longitudinal ligament. For patients with severe deformity, the lateral approach may be used for anterior column support and to augment arthrodesis.

scholarly journals Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Tempel ◽  
Gurpreet S. Gandhoke ◽  
Christopher M. Bonfield ◽  
David O. Okonkwo ◽  
Adam S. Kanter
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
The Mean

Object A hybrid approach of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) followed by supplementary open posterior segmental instrumented fusion (PSIF) has shown promising early results in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Studies assessing the impact of this combined approach on correction of segmental and regional coronal angulation, sagittal realignment, maximum Cobb angle, restoration of lumbar lordosis, and clinical outcomes are needed. The authors report their results of this approach for correction of adult degenerative scoliosis. Methods Twenty-six patients underwent combined LLIF and PSIF in a staged fashion. The patient population consisted of 21 women and 5 men. Ages ranged from 40 to 77 years old. Radiographic measurements including coronal angulation, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were taken preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in all patients. Concurrently, the visual analog score (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were used to assess clinical outcomes in 19 patients. Results At 1-year follow-up, all patients who underwent combined LLIF and PSIF achieved statistically significant mean improvement in regional coronal angles (from 14.9° to 5.8°, p < 0.01) and segmental coronal angulation at all operative levels (p < 0.01). The maximum Cobb angle was significantly reduced postoperatively (from 41.1° to 15.1°, p < 0.05) and was maintained at follow-up (12.0°, p < 0.05). The mean lumbar lordosis–pelvic incidence mismatch was significantly improved postoperatively (from 15.0° to 6.92°, p < 0.05). Although regional lumbar lordosis improved (from 43.0° to 48.8°), it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). The mean sagittal vertical axis was significantly improved postoperatively (from 59.5 mm to 34.2 mm, p < 0.01). The following scores improved significantly after surgery: VAS for back pain (from 7.5 to 4.3, p < 0.01) and leg pain (from 5.8 to 3.1, p < 0.01), ODI (from 48 to 38, p < 0.01), and PCS (from 27.5 to 35.0, p = 0.01); the MCS score did not improve significantly (from 43.2 to 45.5, p = 0.37). There were 3 major and 10 minor complications. Conclusions A hybrid approach of minimally invasive LLIF and open PSIF is an effective means of achieving correction of both coronal and sagittal deformity, resulting in improvement of quality of life in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.

scholarly journals The clinical and radiographic outcomes of stand-alone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Liu ◽  
Xin Ge ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Liang Xiao ◽  
Hongguang Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background The minimally invasive treatment for adult degenerative scoliosis has become more and more popular. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of stand-alone oblique lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods A total of 18 patients with ADS who underwent stand-alone OLIF in our hospital from July 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled in the study. Clinical evaluations were performed with visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic outcomes were recorded in terms of coronal Cobb angle and lumbar lordosis. Results Mean patient age was 62.4 years, 50% of patients were female. Average follow up was 18.4 months. The average operative duration was 87.4 minutes, whilst the mean estimated blood loss was 45.6 ml. Mean coronal Cobb angle corrected from preoperative 15.2° to the final follow-up 6.8° (p < 0.05); and mean lumbar lordosis improved from preoperative 30.0° to 39.4° (p < 0.05). Mean disc height increased from preoperative 0.7 cm to 1.1 cm at final follow-up (p < 0.05). Mean VAS improved from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < 0.05). The mean preoperative and the final follow-up Oswestry Disability Indices were 27.8% and 13.1% respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions Stand-alone OLIF could be regarded as an efficient and safe option in the treatment of ADS for careful selected patients.

scholarly journals SAGITTAL BALANCE AFTER POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION IN LUMBAR FRACTURES

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Muñiz Luna ◽  
Fernando Guevara Villazón ◽  
José Enrique Salcedo Oviedo ◽  
Iván Omar Cáliz Castorena
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Balance ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Spinopelvic Balance ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Lumbar Fractures

ABSTRACT Objective: When a lumbar fractures developes a significant deformity, the sagittal balance is altered which can lead to clinical consequences. The aim of this study was to measure and analyze the sagittal balance in patients with lumbar fractures operated with posterior instrumentation after three months and analyze their correlation with the different variables of the patient and the fracture. Methods: Sixty-three medical records of patients with lumbar fracture operated with posterior instrumentation were analyzed, excluding those with previous spinal pathology, or inability to stand upright. The parameters of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, lumbar lordosis/pelvic incidence (LL/ PI) ratio, as well as the pre and postoperative status of segmental kyphosis and residual pain were measured. Results: Eighteen women, 44 men, with mean age of 42 years, with lumbar fractures: 29 in L1, 19 in L2, 10 in L3, 3 in L4 and 1 in L5. AOSpine Clasification: 2 type A1, 2 type A2, 37 type A3, 19 type A4, 2 type B. All patients were operated with a transpedicular polyaxial system. More than 80% of patients with spinopelvic balance within parameters considered normal. More than 70% with lumbar lordosis and LL/PI ratio within parameters. All with improvement of segmental kyphosis (average correction of 8.5°, p<.000). Final mean VAS of 1.85. Conclusions: The posterior instrumentation with a polyaxial system allows acceptable corrections of the segmental kyphosis of lumbar fractures. No statistically significant correlation was found between sagittal balance parameters, and characteristics of the patient and fracture. Level of Evidence IV; Case series.

The impact of increasing interbody fusion levels at the fractional curve on lordosis, curve correction, and complications in adult patients with scoliosis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dominic Amara ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Shane Burch ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Curve Correction ◽  
Surgery Rates

OBJECTIVERadiculopathy from the fractional curve, usually from L3 to S1, can create severe disability. However, treatment methods of the curve vary. The authors evaluated the effect of adding more levels of interbody fusion during treatment of the fractional curve.METHODSA single-institution retrospective review of adult patients treated for scoliosis between 2006 and 2016 was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: fractional curves from L3 to S1 > 10°, ipsilateral radicular symptoms concordant on the fractional curve concavity side, patients who underwent at least 1 interbody fusion at the level of the fractional curve, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes included changes in fractional curve correction, lumbar lordosis change, pelvic incidence − lumbar lordosis mismatch change, scoliosis major curve correction, and rates of revision surgery and postoperative complications. Secondary analysis compared the same outcomes among patients undergoing posterior, anterior, and lateral approaches for their interbody fusion.RESULTSA total of 78 patients were included. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, prior surgery, fractional curve degree, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence − lumbar lordosis mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, coronal balance, scoliotic curve magnitude, proportion of patients undergoing an osteotomy, or average number of levels fused among the groups. The mean follow-up was 35.8 months (range 12–150 months). Patients undergoing more levels of interbody fusion had more fractional curve correction (7.4° vs 12.3° vs 12.1° for 1, 2, and 3 levels; p = 0.009); greater increase in lumbar lordosis (−1.8° vs 6.2° vs 13.7°, p = 0.003); and more scoliosis major curve correction (13.0° vs 13.7° vs 24.4°, p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the groups with regard to postoperative complications (overall rate 47.4%, p = 0.85) or need for revision surgery (overall rate 30.7%, p = 0.25). In the secondary analysis, patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) had a greater increase in lumbar lordosis (9.1° vs −0.87° for ALIF vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF], p = 0.028), but also higher revision surgery rates unrelated to adjacent-segment pathology (25% vs 4.3%, p = 0.046). Higher ALIF revision surgery rates were driven by rod fracture in the majority (55%) of cases.CONCLUSIONSMore levels of interbody fusion resulted in increased lordosis, scoliosis curve correction, and fractional curve correction. However, additional levels of interbody fusion up to 3 levels did not result in more postoperative complications or morbidity. ALIF resulted in a greater lumbar lordosis increase than TLIF, but ALIF had higher revision surgery rates.

scholarly journals Second sacral sacralalar‐iliac (S2AI) screw placement in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients: an imaging study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Wu ◽  
Kai Song ◽  
Junyao Cheng ◽  
Pengfei Chi ◽  
Zhaohan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Imaging Study ◽  
Outer Diameter ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Lateral Angle ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Imaging Characteristics ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Trajectory Length

Abstract Background The imaging characteristics of sacral sacralalar-iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients will be determined. Methods S2AI screw trajectories were mapped on three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) reconstructions of 40 ADS patients. The starting point, placement plane, screw template, and a circle centered at the lowest point of the ilium inner cortex were set on these images. A tangent line from the starting point to the outer diameter of the circle was selected as the axis of the screw trajectory. The related parameters in different populations were analyzed and compared. Results The trajectory length of S2AI screws in ADS patients was 12.00 ± 0.99 cm, the lateral angle was 41.24 ± 3.92°, the caudal angle was 27.73 ± 6.45°, the distance from the axis of the screw trajectory to the iliosciatic notch was 1.05 ± 0.81 cm, the distance from the axis of the screw trajectory to the upper edge of the acetabulum was 1.85 ± 0.33 cm, and the iliac width was 2.12 ± 1.65 cm. Compared with females, the lateral angle of male ADS patients was decreased, but the trajectory length was increased (P < 0.05). Compared to patients without ADS in previous studies, the lateral angle of male patients was larger, the lateral angle of female patients was increased, and the caudal angle was decreased (P < 0.05). Conclusions There is an ideal trajectory of S2AI screws in ADS patients. A different direction should be noticed in the placement of S2AI screws, especially in female patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document