scholarly journals How to Study People Who Do Not Want to be Studied: Practical Reflections on Studying Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. 51-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Souleles
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjaana Jauhola ◽  
Yudi Bolong

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 470-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Sohl

Intimacy, shared experiences and evening out the power relations between researcher and the participants play an important role in feminist methodology. However, as highlighted in previous research on studying ‘up’, such methods might not be appropriate when studying privileged groups. Therefore, studying privileged women challenges fundamental assumptions in feminist methodology. When researching privileged women, the assumption that the researcher is almost always in a superior position within the research process becomes more complicated. The article seeks to contribute to the feminist methodological literature on how to study privileged groups by exploring how class, gender and whiteness are produced in three fieldwork situations with women who hold privileges in a postcolonial and capitalist landscape. Drawing on interviews and participant observations with white Swedish migrant women, the article argues that researchers need to turn the problems, fears and feelings of being uncomfortable into important data, in order to study privileged groups of women.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-252
Author(s):  
Hugh Gusterson

Abstract In her 1973 article “up the anthropologist” Laura Nader called on anthropologists to engage in critical studies of the relationship between powerful institutions and the broader society, using a “vertical slice” approach. But Nader worried that participant observation was hard in the context of studying up, and yet it has been presented as definitive of anthropology’s methodology. This article discusses four methodological strategies for studying up in the light of this concern: insider ethnography; covert ethnography; remote ethnography; and adapted participant observation. The first two have intellectual or ethical liabilities. The last is increasingly normalized. Going forward, anthropologists studying up face two obstacles: first, the increasingly totalizing hold of corporate and government workplaces over their employees, even when they are not at work; and, second, university institutional review boards (irb s) concerned to avoid conflictual or critical research.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Gusterson
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Priyadharshini
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taat Wulandari

AbstractRegarding education is a means of countries to develop, there are some policiesand strategies to fulfill the above mission. Such as to provide good infrastructures andstructures to develop curriculum, to develop the quality of teachers, to increase education budget and to adopt the good aspect of others education system.This article is to elaborate education system in United States of America. Despite there are some countries which have good education system, USA has relatively good education system. It is not surprisingly that there are some qualified universities, so that some students choose these universities for studying. Up to now the numbers of Indonesian graduate from USA is still in the first range.Keywords: Education, policy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-226
Author(s):  
Daniel Souleles

It is now routine for anthropologists to study those who exercise power and control wealth and status in any number of societies. Implicit in anthropology’s long-standing commitment to apprehending societies in their totality, and explicit in the call to study up, paying attention to power is just one of the routine things that anthropologists do in the course of their fieldwork. That said, many theoretical and ethical norms in the discipline are calibrated to allow researchers to both know about and protect those with relatively little power who made up much of anthropology’s original topical area of interests. By contrast, studying people who exercise power entails special ethical and theoretical consideration. This article enumerates some of those considerations, and suggests that anthropologists need to have coherent theories of social action in addition to theories of social meaning. The article also suggests that some canonical disciplinary ethical norms are inappropriate for the study of the powerful for empirical and practical reasons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document