Hydrogen sulphide: an emerging regulator of plant defence signalling

Plant Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Choudhary ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
N. Khatri ◽  
R. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Sulphide ◽  
Plant Defence ◽  
Defence Signalling

scholarly journals What Slows Down Phytoplasma Proliferation? Speculations on the Involvement of AtSEOR2 Protein in Plant Defence Signalling

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e1473666 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pagliari ◽  
S. Buoso ◽  
S. Santi ◽  
A. J. E. Van Bel ◽  
R. Musetti
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defence ◽  
Defence Signalling

Plant defence signalling induced by biotic attacks

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby JA Bruce ◽  
John A Pickett
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defence ◽  
Defence Signalling

Fine-Tuning Plant Defence Signalling: Salicylate versus Jasmonate

Plant Biology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. M. Beckers ◽  
S. H. Spoel
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defence ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Defence Signalling

scholarly journals Calcium in plant defence-signalling pathways

2006 ◽  
Vol 171 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lecourieux ◽  
Raoul Ranjeva ◽  
Alain Pugin
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defence ◽  
Signalling Pathways ◽  
Defence Signalling

Plant defence responses: what have we learnt from Arabidopsis?

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise F. Thatcher ◽  
Jonathan P. Anderson ◽  
Karam B. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defence ◽  
Signalling Pathways ◽  
Induced Responses ◽  
Form Complex ◽  
Cellular Events ◽  
Model Plant Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Defence Signalling ◽  
Defence Responses ◽  
Plant Defence Responses ◽  
Plant Arabidopsis Thaliana

To overcome the attack of invading pathogens, a plant’s defence system relies on preformed and induced responses. The induced responses are activated following detection of a pathogen, with the subsequent transmission of signals and orchestrated cellular events aimed at eliminating the pathogen and preventing its spread. Numerous studies are proving that the activated signalling pathways are not simply linear, but rather, form complex networks where considerable cross talk takes place. This review covers the recent application of powerful genetic and genomic approaches to identify key defence signalling pathways in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. The identification of key regulatory components of these pathways may offer new approaches to increase the defence capabilities of crop plants.

Christopher John Lamb CBE. 19 March 1950 — 21 August 2009

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 189-213
Author(s):  
Joanne Chory ◽  
Rod Casey
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Information ◽  
Plant Defence ◽  
Science Research ◽  
The World ◽  
Plant Genes ◽  
Defence Signalling ◽  
Defence Responses ◽  
Plant Pathogen Interactions ◽  
Biology Laboratory

Chris Lamb was one of the most influential plant biologists of his time. He was director of the Plant Biology Laboratory at the Salk Institute and of the John Innes Centre, two of the world's leading plant and microbial research institutions. He was recognized by the Institute for Scientific Information as one of the most highly cited researchers worldwide in plant and animal science. His field of study was plant–pathogen interactions, and he made seminal contributions to the understanding of the molecular basis of plant defence. His efforts led to discoveries such as how cell wall composition influences microbial entry, which plant genes are rapidly induced on infection, and the role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in plant defence signalling. His work demonstrated a number of links between defence responses in plants and in animals. He believed that plant and microbial science research could be used to improve the world, and he took his belief to the local communities, to regional and national media and to Westminster. He had a skill for talent spotting, and one of his major legacies is the number of careers that he nurtured and are now flourishing at universities and institutes across the world.

scholarly journals Plants versus pathogens: an evolutionary arms race

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Anderson ◽  
Cynthia A. Gleason ◽  
Rhonda C. Foley ◽  
Peter H. Thrall ◽  
Jeremy B. Burdon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Plant Defence ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Arms Race ◽  
Effector Triggered Immunity ◽  
Defence Signalling ◽  
Defence Responses ◽  
Plant Pathogen Interactions ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Plant Defence Responses

The analysis of plant–pathogen interactions is a rapidly moving research field and one that is very important for productive agricultural systems. The focus of this review is on the evolution of plant defence responses and the coevolution of their pathogens, primarily from a molecular-genetic perspective. It explores the evolution of the major types of plant defence responses including pathogen associated molecular patterns and effector triggered immunity as well as the forces driving pathogen evolution, such as the mechanisms by which pathogen lineages and species evolve. Advances in our understanding of plant defence signalling, stomatal regulation, R gene–effector interactions and host specific toxins are used to highlight recent insights into the coevolutionary arms race between pathogens and plants. Finally, the review considers the intriguing question of how plants have evolved the ability to distinguish friends such as rhizobia and mycorrhiza from their many foes.

scholarly journals Author Correction: Increased insect herbivore performance under elevated CO2 is associated with lower plant defence signalling and minimal declines in nutritional quality

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott N. Johnson ◽  
Jamie M. Waterman ◽  
Casey R. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Elevated Co2 ◽  
Nutritional Quality ◽  
Plant Defence ◽  
Insect Herbivore ◽  
Herbivore Performance ◽  
Defence Signalling ◽  
Lower Plant

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document