Arithmetic and algebraic problem solving and resource allocation: The distinct impact of fluid and numerical intelligence

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Dix ◽  
Elke van der Meer
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 444-449
Author(s):  
Robert B. Femiano

You may be surprised to learn that most first graders can solve for x in such problems as 2x + 1 = 21. I know so because they do it in my classroom daily, just not in the abstract form of x's and y's. Even though primary-grade students may lack the formal level of thinking required to “efficiently” solve equations, algebraic reasoning is still possible when approached in less sterile and more practical ways. This article shares teaching experiences that show just that outcome: when an equation is redesigned into a problemsolving story or a logic puzzle or is in some other way wrapped in meaning, even six-yearolds know enough mathematics to solve it.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (14) ◽  
pp. 5456-5465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Jaques ◽  
Henrique Seffrin ◽  
Geiseane Rubi ◽  
Felipe de Morais ◽  
Cássio Ghilardi ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson W. Polsby

Most people who study politics are in general agreement, it seems to me, on at least two propositions. First, we agree that for a political system to be viable, for it to succeed in performing tasks of authoritative resource allocation, problem solving, conflict settlement, and so on, in behalf of a population of any substantial size, it must be institutionalized. That is to say, organizations must be created and sustained that are specialized to political activity.1 Otherwise, the political system is likely to be unstable, weak, and incapable of servicing the demands or protecting the interests of its constituent groups. Secondly, it is generally agreed that for a political system to be in some sense free and democratic, means must be found for institutionalizing representativeness with all the diversity that this implies, and for legitimizing yet at the same time containing political opposition within the system.2Our growing interest in both of these propositions, and in the problems to which they point, can begin to suggest the importance of studying one of the very few extant examples of a highly specialized political institution which over the long run has succeeded in representing a large number of diverse constituents, and in legitimizing, expressing, and containing political opposition within a complex political system—namely, the U.S. House of Representatives.The focus of my attention here will be first of all descriptive, drawing together disparate strands—some of which already exist in the literature3—in an attempt to show in what sense we may regard the House as an institutionalized organ of government. Not all the necessary work has been done on this rather difficult descriptive problem, as I shall indicate. Secondly, I shall offer a number of speculative observations about causes, consequences, and possible lessons to be draw from the institutionalization of the House.


1968 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson W. Polsby

Most people who study politics are in general agreement, it seems to me, on at least two propositions. First, we agree that for a political system to be viable, for it to succeed in performing tasks of authoritative resource allocation, problem solving, conflict settlement, and so on, in behalf of a population of any substantial size, it must be institutionalized. That is to say, organizations must be created and sustained that are specialized to political activity. Otherwise, the political system is likely to be unstable, weak, and incapable of servicing the demands or protecting the interests of its constituent groups. Secondly, it is generally agreed that for a political system to be in some sense free and democratic, means must be found for institutionalizing representativeness with all the diversity that this implies, and for legitimizing yet at the same time containing political opposition within the system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 5405-5413
Author(s):  
Chan Li Ying ◽  
Sharifah Osman ◽  
Dian Kurniati ◽  
Edi Sunjayanto Masykuri ◽  
Jeya Amantha Kumar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document