Innovation or implementation? Local response to low‐carbon policy experimentation in China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihong Guo ◽  
Qijiao Song ◽  
Ye Qi



2010 ◽  
Vol 129-131 ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Li Fang Qiao ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Lian Fang Yao ◽  
Xin Zheng Li

The landscape industry has become one of the industries with higher resource and energy consumption, and the implementation of urban low-carbon landscape construction is of great significance to improve the ecological environment. In this study, the method of low-carbon landscape construction was studied from two aspects including the carbon source control and carbon sink, as well as both direct and indirect effect. The results showed that the low-carbon landscape construction can be controlled from five aspects including landscape planning, landscape design, low-carbon landscape technology, low-carbon landscape behavior and low-carbon policy. Through a series of low-carbon measures, carbon emissions can be controlled at a reasonable level during the urban landscape construction, which also promotes the sustainable development of urban ecological environment.







Energy Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Jr. Matthew ◽  
William J Nuttall ◽  
Ben Mestel ◽  
Laurence S Dooley


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taehoon Hong ◽  
Jimin Kim ◽  
Choongwan Koo ◽  
Kwangbok Jeong


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwei Cheng ◽  
Dong Mu ◽  
Yi Zhang

This paper established cooperation decision model for a mixed carbon policy of carbon trading-carbon tax (environmental tax) in a two-stageS-Msupply chain. For three different cooperative abatement situations, we considered the supplier driven model, the manufacturer driven model, and the equilibrium game model. We investigated the influence of mixed carbon policy with constraint of reduction targets on supply chain price, productivity, profits, carbon emissions reduction rate, and so on. The results showed that (1) high-strength carbon policies do not necessarily encourage enterprises to effectively reduce emissions, and increasing market acceptance of low carbon products or raising the price of carbon quota can promote the benign reduction; (2) perfect competitive carbon market has a higher carbon reduction efficiency than oligarch carbon market, but their optimal level of cooperation is the same and the realized reduction rate is in line with the intensity of carbon policy; (3) the policy sensitivity of the carbon trading mechanism is stronger than the carbon tax; “paid quota mechanism” can subsidize the cost of abatement and improve reduction initiative. Finally, we use a numerical example to solve the optimal decisions under different market situations, validating the effectiveness of model and the conclusions.



2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongguo Wen ◽  
Huifang Li ◽  
Xueying Zhang ◽  
Jason Chi Kin Lee ◽  
Chang Xu


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document