Anti‐ HB c screening – is it worth the effort? Results of a 10‐year surveillance programme covering more than 30 million donations in Germany

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Houareau ◽  
Ruth Offergeld
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (02) ◽  
pp. 266-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Benilde Cosmi ◽  
Stefano Radicchia ◽  
Franca Veschi ◽  
Enrico Boschetti ◽  
...  

SummaryImpedance plethysmography (IPG) has high sensitivity and specificity in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) while it fails to detect asymptomatic DVT. The aim of this study was to determine whether the features of thrombi such as location, size and occlusiveness could explain the different accuracy of IPG in symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT patients. One-hundred and seventeen consecutive outpatients with a clinical suspicion of DVT and 246 consecutive patients undergoing hip surgery were admitted to the study. In symptomatic patients IPG was performed on the day of referral, followed by venography, while in asymptomatic patients IPG was performed as a surveillance programme, followed by bilateral venography.A venography proved DVT was observed in 37% of the symptomatic patients and 34% of the asymptomatic limbs. A significantly higher proportion of proximal DVTs was found in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients (78% vs 46%; p = 0.001). The mean Marder score, taken as an index of thrombus size, was significantly higher in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients (19.0 vs 9.6; p = 0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of occlusive DVTs was observed in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (69% vs 36%; p = 0.001).We conclude that the unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy of IPG in asymptomatic DVT is due to the high prevalence of distal, small and non occlusive thrombi. Such thrombi are unlikely to cause a critical obstruction of the venous outflow and therefore to produce a positive IPG.



2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naylê Francelino Holanda Duarte ◽  
Carlos Henrique Alencar ◽  
Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa Cavalcante ◽  
Francisco Gustavo Silveira Correia ◽  
Phyllis Catharina Romijn ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Flacio ◽  
Lukas Engeler ◽  
Mauro Tonolla ◽  
Peter Lüthy ◽  
Nicola Patocchi


2021 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2020-103159
Author(s):  
Jan Ekstrand ◽  
Armin Spreco ◽  
Håkan Bengtsson ◽  
Roald Bahr

BackgroundThe UEFA Elite Club Injury Study is the largest and longest running injury surveillance programme in football.ObjectiveTo analyse the 18-season time trends in injury rates among male professional football players.Methods3302 players comprising 49 teams (19 countries) were followed from 2000–2001 through 2018–2019. Team medical staff recorded individual player exposure and time-loss injuries.ResultsA total of 11 820 time-loss injuries were recorded during 1 784 281 hours of exposure. Injury incidence fell gradually during the 18-year study period, 3% per season for both training injuries (95% CI 1% to 4% decrease, p=0.002) and match injuries (95% CI 2% to 3% decrease, p<0.001). Ligament injury incidence decreased 5% per season during training (95% CI 3% to 7% decrease, p<0.001) and 4% per season during match play (95% CI 3% to 6% decrease, p<0.001), while the rate of muscle injuries remained constant. The incidence of reinjuries decreased by 5% per season during both training (95% CI 2% to 8% decrease, p=0.001) and matches (95% CI 3% to 7% decrease, p<0.001). Squad availability increased by 0.7% per season for training sessions (95% CI 0.5% to 0.8% increase, p<0.001) and 0.2% per season for matches (95% CI 0.1% to 0.3% increase, p=0.001).ConclusionsOver 18 years: (1) injury incidence decreased in training and matches, (2) reinjury rates decreased, and (3) player availability for training and match play increased.



2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Reis ◽  
M Tavakoli ◽  
J Dewar ◽  
D Goudie ◽  
A Cook ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Delos ◽  
F. Hervieu ◽  
L. Folcher ◽  
A. Micoud ◽  
N. Eychenne




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document