Constraint Effect—How to Link Between Structural Integrity Assessment and Fracture Toughness Evaluation

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
M. Toyoda

The difference in the degree of plastic constraint in the vicinity of a pre-existing crack brings about difficulty in the evaluation of fracture performance of weldments when using fracture toughness obtained by conventional fracture toughness test results. The constraint controlling factors can be divided into two main areas, geometrical and material factors. The effect of both factors on the stress/strain behavior in the vicinity of a crack tip is discussed systematically based on previous research and numerical analyses. It is clarified that the common fracture parameters such as J and CTOD do not always represent material constants because of the change of stress/strain behavior as a result of the difference in plastic constraint. The possibility of evaluation based on the local approach is discussed in order to link between structural integrity assessment and fracture toughness evaluation.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Shimodaira ◽  
Tohru Tobita ◽  
Yasuto Nagoshi ◽  
Kai Lu ◽  
Jinya Katsuyama

Abstract In the structural integrity assessment of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV), the fracture toughness (KJc) should be higher than the stress intensity factor at the crack tip of a semi-elliptical shaped under-clad crack (UCC), which is prescribed in JEAC4206-2016. However, differences in crack depth and existence of cladding between the postulated crack and fracture toughness test specimens would be affected to the plastic constraint state and KJc evaluation. In this study, we performed fracture toughness tests and finite element analyses to investigate the effect of plastic constraint and cladding on the semi-elliptical shaped crack in KJc evaluation. The apparent KJc value evaluated at the deepest point of the crack exceeded 5% fracture probability based on the Master Curve method estimated from C(T) specimens, and the conservativeness of the current integrity assessment method was confirmed. Few initiation sites were observed along the tip of semi-elliptical shaped crack other than the deepest point. The plastic constraint state was also analyzed along the crack tip, and it was found that the plastic constraint at the crack tip near the surface was lower than that for the deepest point. Moreover, it was quantitatively showed that the UCC decreased the plastic constraint. The local approach suggested higher KJc value for the UCC than that for the surface crack, reflecting the low constraint effect for the UCC.


Author(s):  
George Karzov ◽  
Boris Margolin ◽  
Victoria Shvetsova ◽  
Victor Kostylev

A key input to calculation of the structural integrity of the RPV by the brittle fracture criterion is known to be the fracture toughness of a material. When calculating resistance of RPV to brittle fracture it was taken earlier that fracture toughness, KJC, depends only on temperature, and does not depend on thickness of specimens if this thickness is sufficiently large so that the plane strain condition is satisfied. To date it has become clear by many researches that KJC depends on a crack front length. This follows from the statistical nature of brittle fracture in steels. It means that for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity, the dependence of KJC on the postulated flaw size has to be taken into account. Moreover, it has been shown that the KJC values for specimens with shallow cracks are larger than for specimens with deep cracks, and the KJC values obtained from small-size fracture toughness specimens (for example, pre-cracked Charpy specimens) are larger than the values for CT specimens with thickness of 25 mm, and KJC values may be affected load biaxiality. These findings are explained by the loss of constraint. Thus, for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion, the scale factor has to be taken into account, with two causes being responsible: the physical cause connected with the statistical nature of brittle fracture and the mechanical one related to the difference in constraint for specimens of various geometries. This analysis is important for assessment of RPV structural integrity because i) for most cases the postulated flaws in RPV, due to their size and location, may be considered as shallow cracks; ii) the KJC values for irradiated RPV steels are usually obtained from small-size surveillance specimens that are as a rule, pre-cracked Charpy specimens; iii) for a postulated flaw in RPV, a load acts both perpendicular and along a crack front. i.e. loading is biaxial. For adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion it is also necessary to take into account that distribution of the stress intensity factor along a crack front in RPV is heterogeneous, and loading is non-monotonic and non-isothermal. In the present report, advanced approaches are considered for assessment of RPV structural integrity that allow solving the above problems. The considered approaches have been included in Russian Standards for assessment of RPV structural integrity.


Author(s):  
Masaki Shimodaira ◽  
Tohru Tobita ◽  
Hisashi Takamizawa ◽  
Jinya Katsuyama ◽  
Satoshi Hanawa

Abstract According to JEAC4206-2016, in the structural integrity assessment of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV), the fracture toughness (KJc) should be higher than the stress intensity factor at the crack tip of a postulated underclad crack (UCC) near the inner surface of the RPV during a pressurized thermal shock event. Previous analytical studies show that the plastic constraint for UCC is lower than that for surface crack. Consequently, the apparent KJc for UCC is expected to be higher than that for surface crack. In this study, we performed three-point bending fracture toughness tests and finite element analyses (FEAs) for RPV steel containing a UCC or a surface crack to quantitatively investigate the effect of cladding on the plastic constraint and subsequent KJc evaluation. From the tests, we found that the apparent KJc for the UCC was considerably higher than that for the surface crack. Such a high KJc could be explained by the lower plastic constraint parameters, such as T-stress and Q-parameter, of the UCC compared with those for the surface crack. Additionally, local approach analysis showed that the KJc for the UCC was significantly higher than the master curve estimated from the fracture toughness tests using compact tension specimens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document