A 50-Year History of the Dynamic Systems and Control Division

1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (2B) ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Franke ◽  
P. M. Lynch ◽  
A. J. Healey

The Division began as a technical committee in 1936 and became the Industrial Instruments and Regulators Division in 1943. Significant events and broadening technology that led to Division name changes and evolution are described. The Division received its current name in 1977. The leadership role of the Division in the field of dynamic systems and control is outlined. Objectives, scope, and activities of the Division are discussed, and statistical data and trends are given.

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (06) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
David M. Auslander

This article presents in depth the history activities of the Dynamic Systems and Control Division (DSCD) in the last 20 years. The 10 most cited papers from this 20-year period have been discussed in the article. Of these 10 papers, 4 of them are review or survey articles. The topics vary, showing the scope of DSCD’s activities: system identification, time delay systems, multivehicle control, and elastic manipulator arms. The most cited article is about nanotechnology; other areas represented are machine tool control, mechanical control to minimize vibrations, automotive, and piezoelectric actuators. These papers do stay true to the mechanical engineering roots of the DSCD. Other than the paper on time-delay systems, all of these papers directly reference mechanical systems. Some are application specific and others refer to specific classes of mechanical systems such as flexible manipulators.


1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (2B) ◽  
pp. 234-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Auslander

In this essay, on the observance of the 50th anniversary of the founding of ASME’s Dynamic Systems and Control Division, I try to connect the technology of control to the way in which control practitioners think. Despite some tension between the conclusions implied in the introductory paragraphs and conclusions drawn later in the essay, I have left them to stand in their original form to emphasize tensions in control thinking, for which the source might not be apparent. The opinions expressed here are strictly my own, but I must acknowledge the creative proddings of my colleagues in getting these thoughts recorded at all.


2021 ◽  
pp. 403-475
Author(s):  
Kostas Triantafyllopoulos

Author(s):  
Chi Jin ◽  
Anson Maitland ◽  
John McPhee

Abstract Publisher’s Note: This paper was selected for publication in ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control. https://www.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/lettersdynsys/article/doi/10.1115/1.4046395/1074688/Hierarchical-Nonlinear-Moving-Horizon-Estimation


Author(s):  
Michael T. Benson ◽  
Harish Sathishchandra ◽  
Garrett M. Clayton ◽  
Sean B. Andersson

Abstract Publisher’s Note: This paper was selected for publication in ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control. https://www.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/lettersdynsys/article/doi/10.1115/1.4046574/1075674/Compressive-Sensing-Based-Reconstruction-of


Author(s):  
Jihun Han ◽  
Dominik Karbowski ◽  
Namdoo Kim ◽  
Aymeric Rousseau

Abstract Publisher’s Note: This paper was selected for publication in ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control. https://www.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/lettersdynsys/article/doi/10.1115/1.4046575/1075675/Human-Driver-Modeling-Based-on-Analytical-Optimal


Author(s):  
Matilde D’Arpino ◽  
Massimo Cancian

Abstract Publisher’s Note: This paper was selected for publication in ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control. https://www.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/lettersdynsys/article/doi/10.1115/1.4046579/1075680/Lifetime-Optimization-for-a-Grid-Friendly-DC-Fast


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document