Reducing CO2 Emissions From a Coal Fired Power Plant by Using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell

Author(s):  
Jarosław Milewski ◽  
Janusz Lewandowski ◽  
Andrzej Miller

A Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) is shown to reduce CO2 emissions from a Coal Fired Power Plant (CFPP). The MCFC is placed in the flue gas stream of the coal fired boiler. The main advantages of this solution are: higher total electric power generated by a hybrid system, reduced CO2 emissions and higher system efficiency. The model of the MCFC is given and described. The results obtained show that use of an MCFC could reduce CO2 emissions by 56%, which gives a relative CO2 emission rate of 288 kgCO2 per MWh.

2013 ◽  
Vol 376 ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarosław Milewski ◽  
Wojciech Bujalski ◽  
Marcin Wołowicz ◽  
Kamil Futyma ◽  
Rafał Bernat

The paper presents an experimental investigation of using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) for reducing CO2 emission from the flue gas of a lignite boiler. The MCFC is placed in the flue gas stream and separates CO2 from the cathode side to the anode side. As a result, a mixture of CO2 and H2O is obtained; from which pure CO2 can be obtained by cryogenic condensation of water and carbon dioxide. The main advantages of this solution are: additional electricity generated, reduced CO2 emissions and higher system efficiency. The results obtained show that the use of an MCFC could reduce CO2 emissions by 90% with over 30% efficiency in additional power generation.


Author(s):  
Jarosław Milewski ◽  
Jacek Sałacin´ski ◽  
Andrzej Miller

The possibility of using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) to reduce the CO2 emission from Gas Turbine Power Plant (GTPP) is shown. The MCFC is placed after a gas turbine. The main advantages of this solution are: higher total electric power generated by hybrid system and reduced CO2 emission with remained system efficiency. A comparison of three systems: standard GTPP, GT-MCFC, and GT-MCFC with additional heat exchangers is shown. The application of MCFC could reduce CO2 emission of 73% (absolutely) and 77% relative to produced power.


2013 ◽  
Vol 302 ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarosław Milewski ◽  
Wojciech Bujalski ◽  
Marcin Wołowicz ◽  
Kamil Futyma ◽  
Jan Kucowski ◽  
...  

The paper presents an experimental investigation of using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) for reducing CO2 emission from the flue gas of a hard coal fired boiler. The MCFC is placed in the flue gas stream and separates CO2 from the cathode side to the anode side. As a result, a mixture of CO2 and H2O is obtained; from which pure CO2 can be obtained by water condensation. The main advantages of this solution are: additional electricity generated, reduced CO2 emissions and higher system efficiency. The results obtained show that the use of an MCFC could reduce CO2 emissions by 90% with over 35% efficiency in additional power generation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Braun ◽  
R. A. Gaggioli ◽  
W. R. Dunbar

A proposed molten carbonate fuel cell power plant design, intended for commercial production by the end of the 1990s and developed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Gas Research Institute, and Energy Research Corporation, has been analyzed with exergy and pinch analysis. The commercial production units, targeted for dispersed power generation markets, are based on an existing demonstration molten carbonate fuel cell power plant design which was demonstrated from 1996–1997. Exergy analysis of the commercial plant design shows the overall, second-law system efficiency to be 53 percent. The principal inefficiency, 17 percent of the total, lies in the catalytic combustor. Another major inefficiency is the stack loss, 14 percent. Heat transfer accounts for approximately 6 percent of the loss. System reconfigurations, incorporating a steam cycle with reheat (System I) and a gas turbine cycle (System II), both with revised heat exchanger networks, for significant improvement are proposed and evaluated. The second-law system efficiency is raised to 66 percent in System I and to 70 percent for System II.


Energy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 578-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqiang Duan ◽  
Kun Xia ◽  
Tao Feng ◽  
Shilun Jia ◽  
Jing Bian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document