Louver Slot Cooling and Full-Coverage Film Cooling With a Combination Internal Coolant Supply

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Click ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Maggie Hockensmith ◽  
Joseph Knox ◽  
Chandler Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Test Plate ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Abstract Within the present investigation, a louver slot is employed upstream of an array full coverage film cooling holes. Cooling air is supplied using a combination arrangement, with cross-flow and impingement together. The louver consists of a row of film cooling holes, contained within a specially-designed device which concentrates, and directs the coolant from a slot, so that it then advects as a layer downstream along the test surface. This louver-supplied coolant is then supplemented by coolant which emerges from different rows of downstream film cooling holes. The same coolant supply passage is employed for the louver row of holes, as well as for the film cooling holes, such that different louver and film cooling mass flow rates are set by different hole diameters for the two different types of cooling holes. The results are different from data provided by past investigations, because of the use and arrangement of the louver slot, and because of the unique coolant supply configurations. The experimental results are given for mainstream Reynolds numbers from 107000 to 114000. Full-coverage blowing ratios are constant with streamwise location along the test surface, and range from 3.68 to 5.70. Corresponding louver slot blowing ratios then range from 1.72 to 2.65. Provided are heat transfer coefficient and adiabatic effectiveness distributions, which are measured along the mainstream side of the test plate. Both types of data show less variation with streamwise development location, relative to results obtained without a louver employed, when examined at the same approximate effective blowing ratio, mainstream Reynolds number, cross flow Reynolds number, and impingement jet Reynolds number. When compared at the same effective blowing ratio or the same impingement jet Reynolds number, spanwise-averaged heat transfer coefficients are consistently lower, especially for the downstream regions of the test plate, when the louver is utilized. With the same type of comparisons, the presence of the louver slot results in significantly higher values of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness (spanwise-averaged), particularly at and near the upstream portions of the test plate. With such characteristics, dramatic increases in thermal protection are provided by the presence of the louver slot, the magnitudes of which vary with experimental condition and test surface location.

Louver Slot Cooling and Full-Coverage Film Cooling With a Combination Internal Coolant Supply

2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Click ◽  
Phillip M. Ligrani ◽  
Maggie Hockensmith ◽  
Joseph Knox ◽  
Chandler Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Test Plate ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Abstract Within the present investigation, a louver slot is employed upstream of an array full-coverage film cooling holes. Cooling air is supplied using a combination arrangement, with cross-flow and impingement together. The louver consists of a row of film cooling holes, contained within a specially designed device that concentrates and directs the coolant from a slot, so that it then advects as a layer downstream along the test surface. This louver-supplied coolant is then supplemented by coolant which emerges from different rows of downstream film cooling holes. The same coolant supply passage is employed for the louver row of holes, as well as for the film cooling holes, such that different louver and film cooling mass flowrates are set by different hole diameters for the two different types of cooling holes. The results are different from data provided by past investigations, because of the use and arrangement of the louver slot, and because of the unique coolant supply configurations. The experimental results are given for mainstream Reynolds numbers from 107,000 to 114,000. Full-coverage blowing ratios are constant with streamwise location along the test surface and range from 3.68 to 5.70. Corresponding louver slot blowing ratios then range from 1.72 to 2.65. Provided are heat transfer coefficient and adiabatic effectiveness distributions, which are measured along the mainstream side of the test plate. Both types of data show less variation with streamwise development location, relative to results obtained without a louver employed, when examined at the same approximate effective blowing ratio, mainstream Reynolds number, cross-flow Reynolds number, and impingement jet Reynolds number. When compared at the same effective blowing ratio or the same impingement jet Reynolds number, spanwise-averaged heat transfer coefficients are consistently lower, especially for the downstream regions of the test plate, when the louver is utilized. With the same type of comparisons, the presence of the louver slot results in significantly higher values of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness (spanwise-averaged), particularly at and near the upstream portions of the test plate. With such characteristics, dramatic increases in thermal protection are provided by the presence of the louver slot, the magnitudes of which vary with the experimental condition and test surface location.

Full-Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense Hole Arrays at Different Hole Angles, Contraction Ratios, and Blowing Ratios

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Matt Goodro ◽  
Mike Fox ◽  
Hee-Koo Moon
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Experimental results are presented for a full-coverage film cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a gas turbine engine, with appropriate streamwise static pressure gradient. The test surface utilizes varying blowing ratio (BR) along the length of the contraction passage which contains the cooling hole arrangement. For the different experimental conditions examined, film cooling holes are sharp-edged and streamwise inclined either at 20 deg or 30 deg with respect to the liner surface. The film cooling holes in adjacent streamwise rows are staggered with respect to each other. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratios of 1, 3, 4, and 5, blowing ratios (at the test section entrance) of 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0, coolant Reynolds numbers Refc of 10,000–12,000, freestream temperatures from 75 °C to 115 °C, a film hole diameter of 7 mm, and density ratios from 1.15 to 1.25. Nondimensional streamwise and spanwise film cooling hole spacings, X/D and Y/D, are 6, and 5, respectively. When the streamwise hole inclination angle is 20 deg spatially averaged and line-averaged adiabatic effectiveness values at each x/D location are about the same as the contraction ratio varies between 1, 3, and 4, with slightly higher values at each x/D location when the contraction ratio Cr is 5. For each contraction ratio, there is a slight increase in effectiveness when the blowing ratio is increased from 2.0 to 5.0 but there is no further substantial improvement when the blowing ratio is increased to 10.0. Overall, line-averaged and spatially averaged-adiabatic film effectiveness data, and spatially averaged heat transfer coefficient data are described as they are affected by contraction ratio, blowing ratio, hole angle α, and streamwise location x/D. For example, when α = 20 deg, the detrimental effects of mainstream acceleration are apparent since heat transfer coefficients for contraction ratios Cr of 3 and 5 are often higher than values for Cr = 1, especially for x/D > 100.

Full-Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense Hole Arrays at Different Hole Angles, Contraction Ratios, and Blowing Ratios

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Goodro ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Mike Fox ◽  
Hee-Koo Moon
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Experimental results are presented for a full coverage film cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a gas turbine engine, with appropriate streamwise static pressure gradient. The test surface utilizes varying blowing ratio along the length of the contraction passage which contains the cooling hole arrangement. For the different experimental conditions examined, film cooling holes are sharp-edged and streamwise inclined either at 20° or 30° with respect to the liner surface. The film cooling holes in adjacent streamwise rows are staggered with respect to each other. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratios of 1, 3, 4, and 5, blowing ratios (at the test section entrance) of 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0, coolant Reynolds numbers Refc of 10,000 to 12,000, freestream temperatures from 75°C to 115°C, a film hole diameter of 7 mm, and density ratios from 1.15 to 1.25. Non-dimensional streamwise and spanwise film cooling hole spacings, X/D and Y/D, are 6, and 5, respectively. When the streamwise hole inclination angle is 20°, spatially-averaged and line-averaged adiabatic effectiveness values at each x/D location are about the same as the contraction ratio varies between 1, 3, and 4, with slightly higher values at each x/D location when the contraction ratio Cr is 5. For each contraction ratio, there is a slight increase in effectiveness when the blowing ratio is increased from 2.0 to 5.0 but there is no further substantial improvement when the blowing ratio is increased to 10.0. Overall, line-averaged and spatially-averaged adiabatic film effectiveness data, and spatially-averaged heat transfer coefficient data are described as they are affected by contraction ratio, blowing ratio, hole angle α, and streamwise location x/D. For example, when α = 20°, the detrimental effects of mainstream acceleration are apparent since heat transfer coefficients for contraction ratios Cr of 3 and 5 are often higher than values for Cr = 1, especially for x/D > 100.

Internal and External Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Cooling Plate: Effects of Double Wall Cooling Configuration and Conditions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
Nathan Rogers ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Keith Hollingsworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Test Plate ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Spatially Resolved ◽  
Nusselt Numbers ◽  
Streamwise Location ◽  
Effusion Hole

The present study provides new heat transfer data for both the surfaces of the full coverage effusion cooling plate within a double wall cooling test facility. To produce the cooling stream, a cold-side cross-flow supply for the effusion hole array is employed. Also utilized is a unique mainstream mesh heater, which provides transient thermal boundary conditions, after mainstream flow conditions are established. For the effusion cooled surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, and surface heat transfer coefficients (measured using infrared thermography). For the coolant side, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface Nusselt numbers (measured using liquid crystal thermography). Of interest are the effects of streamwise development, blowing ratio, and Reynolds number. Streamwise hole spacing and spanwise hole spacing (normalized by effusion hole diameter) on the effusion plate are 15 and 4, respectively. Effusion hole diameter is 6.35 mm, effusion hole angle is 25 degrees, and effusion plate thickness is 3 hole diameters. Considered are overall effusion blowing ratios from 2.9 to 7.5, with subsonic, incompressible flow, and constant freestream velocity with streamwise development, for two different mainstream Reynolds numbers. For the hot side (mainstream) of the effusion film cooling test plate, results for two mainflow Reynolds numbers of about 145000 and 96000 show that the adiabatic cooling effectiveness is generally higher for the lower Reynolds number for a particular streamwise location and blowing ratio. The heat transfer coefficient is generally higher for the low Reynolds number flow. This is due to altered supply passage flow behavior, which causes a reduction in coolant lift-off of the film from the surface as coolant momentum, relative to mainstream momentum, decreases. For the coolant side of the effusion test plate, Nusselt numbers generally increase with blowing ratio, when compared at a particular streamwise location and mainflow Reynolds number.

scholarly journals Full Coverage Shaped-Hole Film Cooling in an Accelerating Boundary Layer With High Freestream Turbulence

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Kingery ◽  
F. E. Ames
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Turbulence Level ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Lower Reynolds Number ◽  
Shaped Hole

Full coverage shaped-hole film cooling and downstream heat transfer measurements have been acquired in the accelerating flows over a large cylindrical leading edge test surface. The shaped holes had an 8 deg lateral expansion angled at 30 deg to the surface with spanwise and streamwise spacings of 3 diameters. Measurements were conducted at four blowing ratios, two Reynolds numbers, and six well documented turbulence conditions. Film cooling measurements were acquired over a four to one range in blowing ratio at the lower Reynolds number and at the two lower blowing ratios for the higher Reynolds number. The film cooling measurements were acquired at a coolant to free-stream density ratio of approximately 1.04. The flows were subjected to a low turbulence (LT) condition (Tu = 0.7%), two levels of turbulence for a smaller sized grid (Tu = 3.5% and 7.9%), one turbulence level for a larger grid (8.1%), and two levels of turbulence generated using a mock aerocombustor (AC) (Tu = 9.3% and 13.7%). Turbulence level is shown to have a significant influence in mixing away film cooling coverage progressively as the flow develops in the streamwise direction. Effectiveness levels for the AC turbulence condition are reduced to as low as 20% of LT values by the furthest downstream region. The film cooling discharge is located close to the leading edge with very thin and accelerating upstream boundary layers. Film cooling data at the lower Reynolds number show that transitional flows have significantly improved effectiveness levels compared with turbulent flows. Downstream effectiveness levels are very similar to slot film cooling data taken at the same coolant flow rates over the same cylindrical test surface. However, slots perform significantly better in the near discharge region. These data are expected to be very useful in grounding computational predictions of full coverage shaped-hole film cooling with elevated turbulence levels and acceleration. Infrared (IR) measurements were performed for the two lowest turbulence levels to document the spanwise variation in film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer.

Full Coverage Film Cooling Performance for Combustor Cooling Manufactured Using DMLS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Vinton ◽  
Sara Nahang-Toudeshki ◽  
Lesley M. Wright ◽  
Andrew Carter
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

An experimental investigation of effusion film cooling has been completed for cylindrical, simple angle holes (θ = 20°), using a steady state, pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. The surface effectiveness measurements were obtained in a low speed wind tunnel where the average blowing ratio (M) was varied from 0.5 to 6. For all cases, the coolant–to–mainstream density ratio was fixed at DR = 1.0. The test surface was manufactured using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and was made to replicate full coverage film cooling typically seen for combustor cooling applications. The plate contained 10 staggered rows of film cooling holes, with P/D = 9.8 and S/D = 8.5. At blowing ratios greater than M = 1.0, the downstream film cooling effectiveness is greatly improved by the protection provided from the high momentum jets in the upstream rows. Within the latter-half of the matrix, the effectiveness measured on the surface gradually increased with each passing row. The combination of the holes made a substantial impact downstream, and the effect continued to grow all the way through the end of the plate. With the accumulation of the coolant above the surface, the coolant liftoff was mitigated and enhanced protection was observed on the surface. The DMLS manufacturing technique created surface and hole interior roughness. The hole interior roughness reduced the lateral average film cooling effectiveness by at least 50% when compared to previous investigations.

Full-Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense and Sparse Hole Arrays at Different Blowing Ratios

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Goodro ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Mike Fox ◽  
Hee-Koo Moon
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Array ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Hole Arrays ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Experimental results are presented for a full coverage film cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a gas turbine engine, with appropriate streamwise static pressure gradient and varying blowing ratio along the length of the contraction passage which contains the cooling hole arrangement. Film cooling holes are sharp-edged, streamwise inclined at 20° with respect to the liner surface, and are arranged with a length to diameter ratio of 8.35. The film cooling holes in adjacent streamwise rows are staggered with respect to each other. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratios of 1 and 4, blowing ratios (at the test section entrance) of 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0, coolant Reynolds numbers Refc from 10,000 to 12,000, freestream temperatures from 75°C to 115°C, a film hole diameter of 7 mm, and density ratios from 1.15 to 1.25. Changes to X/D and Y/D, non-dimensional streamwise and spanwise film cooling hole spacings, with Y/D of 3, 5, and 7, and with X/D of 6 and 18, are considered. For all X/D = 6 hole spacings, only a slight increase in effectiveness (local, line-averaged, and spatially-averaged) values are present as the blowing ratio increases from 2.0 to 5.0, with no significant differences when the blowing ratio increases from 5.0 to 10.0. This lack of dependence on blowing ratio indicates a condition where excess coolant is injected into the mainstream flow, a situation not evidenced by data obtained with the X/D = 18 hole spacing arrangement. With this sparse array configuration, local and spatially-averaged effectiveness generally increase continually as the blowing ratio becomes larger. Line-averaged and spatially-averaged heat transfer coefficients are generally higher at each streamwise location, also with larger variations with streamwise development, with the X/D = 6 hole array, compared to the X/D = 18 array.

Double Wall Cooling of a Full Coverage Effusion Plate With Main Flow Pressure Gradient, Including Internal Impingement Array Cooling

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Reddy Vanga ◽  
Zhong Ren ◽  
Austin J. Click ◽  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Federico Liberatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Spatially Resolved ◽  
Contraction Ratio ◽  
Effusion Hole

The present study provides new effusion cooling data for both surfaces of full coverage effusion cooling plate. For the effusion cooled surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, and surface heat transfer coefficients (measured using transient techniques and infrared thermography). For the impingement cooled surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface Nusselt numbers (measured using steady-state liquid crystal thermography). To produce this cool side augmentation, impingement jet arrays at different jet Reynolds numbers, from 2720 to 11100, are employed. Experimental data are given for a sparse effusion hole array, with spanwise and streamwise impingement hole spacing such that coolant jet hole centerlines are located midway between individual effusion hole entrances. Considered are initial effusion blowing ratios from 3.3 to 7.5, with subsonic, incompressible flow. The velocity of the freestream flow which is adjacent to the effusion cooled boundary layer is increasing with streamwise distance, due to a favorable streamwise pressure gradient. Such variations are provided by a main flow passage contraction ratio CR of 4. Of particular interest are effects of impingement jet Reynolds number, effusion blowing ratio, and streamwise development. Also included are comparisons of impingement jet array cooling results with: (i) results associated with cross flow supply cooling with CR = 1 and CR = 4, and (ii) results associated with impingement supply cooling with CR = 1, when the mainstream pressure gradient is near zero. Overall, the present results show that, for the same main flow Reynolds number, approximate initial blowing ratio, and streamwise location, significantly increased thermal protection is generally provided when the effusion coolant is provided by an array of impingement cooling jets, compared to a cross flow coolant supply.

Full-Coverage Film Cooling: Film Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Dense and Sparse Hole Arrays at Different Blowing Ratios

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Ligrani ◽  
Matt Goodro ◽  
Mike Fox ◽  
Hee-Koo Moon
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Hole Array ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Hole Arrays ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Experimental results are presented for a full coverage film cooling arrangement which simulates a portion of a gas turbine engine, with appropriate streamwise static pressure gradient and varying blowing ratio along the length of the contraction passage which contains the cooling hole arrangement. Film cooling holes are sharp-edged, streamwise inclined at 20 deg with respect to the liner surface, and are arranged with a length to diameter ratio of 8.35. The film cooling holes in adjacent streamwise rows are staggered with respect to each other. Data are provided for turbulent film cooling, contraction ratios of 1 and 4, blowing ratios (at the test section entrance) of 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0, coolant Reynolds numbers Refc from 10,000 to 12,000 (for a blowing ratio of 5.0), freestream temperatures from 75 °C to 115 °C, a film hole diameter of 7 mm, and density ratios from 1.15 to 1.25. Changes to X/D and Y/D, nondimensional streamwise and spanwise film cooling hole spacings, with Y/D of 3, 5, and 7, and with X/D of 6 and 18, are considered. For all X/D=6 hole spacings, only a slight increase in effectiveness (local, line-averaged, and spatially-averaged) values are present as the blowing ratio increases from 2.0 to 5.0, with no significant differences when the blowing ratio increases from 5.0 to 10.0. This lack of dependence on blowing ratio indicates a condition where excess coolant is injected into the mainstream flow, a situation not evidenced by data obtained with the X/D=18 hole spacing arrangement. With this sparse array configuration, local and spatially-averaged effectiveness generally increase continually as the blowing ratio becomes larger. Line-averaged and spatially-averaged heat transfer coefficients are generally higher at each streamwise location, also with larger variations with streamwise development, with the X/D=6 hole array, compared to the X/D=18 array.

Full-Coverage Film Cooling—Part II: Heat Transfer Data and Numerical Simulation

1980 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 1006-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Crawford ◽  
W. M. Kays ◽  
R. J. Moffat
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Numerical Procedure ◽  
Stanton Number ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Diameter Hole ◽  
Full Coverage ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Length Data

Experimental research into heat transfer from full-coverage film-cooled surfaces with three injection geometries was described in Part I. This part has two objectives. The first is to present a simple numerical procedure for simulation of heat transfer with full-coverage film cooling. The second objective is to present some of the Stanton number data that was used in Part I of the paper. The data chosen for presentation are the low-Reynolds number, heated-starting-length data for the three injection geometries with five-diameter hole spacing. Sample data sets with high blowing ratio and with ten-diameter hole spacing are also presented. The numerical procedure has been successfully applied to the Stanton number data sets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document