Validation of Plastic Collapse Assessments Using BS 7910:2013 and R6 Procedures

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Şefika Elvin Eren ◽  
Tyler London ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Isabel Hadley
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
British Standard ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Reference Stress Approach

The British Standard, BS 7910 Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures is currently under revision [1]. Major changes have been undertaken, especially in the fracture assessment routes, and this paper specifically addresses the assessment of proximity to plastic collapse, usually expressed as the parameter Lr via either a reference stress or limit load approach. In the new edition of BS 7910, the reference stress approach has been retained for the assessment of many geometries, mainly for reasons of continuity. However, new limit load solutions (originating in the R6 procedure) are given for use in the assessments of strength mismatched structures or clad plates. In general, a reference stress solution and a limit load solution for the same geometry should deliver the same value of Lr. However, recent comparative studies have shown differences in the assessment of plastic collapse depending on whether the reference stress solutions in BS 7910:2013 or the limit load solutions in R6 are used for the calculation of Lr. In this paper, the extent of the difference in the assessment results with respect to the choice of solutions and boundary conditions are discussed. The results of the assessments in accordance with BS 7910 and R6 are compared with the results of numerical assessments obtained via Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The collapse loads observed in various wide plate tests conducted in the last 20 years are also compared with the collapse loads predicted by BS 910:2013, R6 and FEA. Finally, observations regarding the accuracy of different Codes and FEA are discussed.

Differences in the Assessment of Plastic Collapse in BS 7910:2005 and R6/FITNET FFS Procedures

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
S¸efika Elvin Eren ◽  
Isabel Hadley ◽  
Kamran Nikbin
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Fracture Assessment

At present within the fracture assessment routes of different codes and standards, two different options for the assessment of plastic collapse, Lr, are available, namely reference stress and limit load approaches. Recent comparative studies have shown significant differences in the assessment of plastic collapse depending on whether the reference stress solutions in BS 7910:2005 or the limit load solutions in R6/FITNET are used for the calculation of Lr. In this paper, differences with respect to the choice of solutions and boundary conditions will be illustrated and observations regarding the route that the Codes should take with respect to a unified assessment will be discussed.

Limit Loads of Mechanical Components and Structures Using the GLOSS R-Node Method

1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Seshadri ◽  
C. P. D. Fernando
Keyword(s):  
Practical Interest ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Load Control ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Limit Loads ◽  
Linear Elastic ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Stress Classification ◽  
Mechanical Components

A method for determining plastic collapse loads of mechanical components and structures on the basis of two linear elastic finite element analysis is presented in this paper. The r-nodes, which are essentially statically determinate locations, are obtained by GLOSS analysis. The plastic collapse loads are determined for statically determinate and indeterminate components and structures by using the single-bar and the multibar models, respectively. The paper also attempts to unify the concepts of load-control, limit load, reference stress and stress-classification. The GLOSS R-Node method is applied to several component configurations of practical interest.

Limit Loads for Pipe Elbows With Internal Pressure Under In-Plane Closing Bending Moments

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Shalaby ◽  
M. Y. A. Younan
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Nonlinear Finite Element ◽  
Radius Of Curvature ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Bending Moments ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Limit Loads

The purpose of this study is to determine limit loads for pipe elbows subjected to in-plane bending moments that tend to close the elbow (i.e., decrease its radius of curvature), and the influence of internal pressure on the value of the limit load. Load-deflection curves were obtained, and from these curves plastic collapse or instability loads at various values of internal pressure were determined. This was done for different pipe bend factors (h = Rt/r2) using the nonlinear finite element analysis code (ABAQUS) with its special elbow element. The limit load was found to increase and then decrease with increasing pressure for all the elbow geometries studied.

The Numerical Investigation of Plastic Collapse Loads in Cylinders Containing Circumferential Flaws Under a Combined Loading of Internal Pressure, Tension and Bending Moment

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwu Wei
Keyword(s):  
Surface Crack ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Plastic Limit ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Plastic Limit Load ◽  
Assessment Procedures

Fracture assessment diagram (FAD) based fracture assessment procedures are universally adopted by standards/documents including BS7910, R6, API579-1/ASME FFS-1 and FITNET. In the use of a FAD for structural integrity assessment, one important consideration is to determine the load ratio (Lr) which is defined by two equivalent definitions: Lr is either defined as the ratio of reference stress (σref) to yield strength (σY) as in BS7910, or as the ratio of applied load to plastic limit load as in R6. The solutions of reference stress or limit load are given in the assessment procedures for commonly encountered flawed structures such as a plate containing a surface crack and a cylinder containing an external surface crack. Although the solutions given in the various standards are not all the same, they were invariably derived on the basis of analysis of the force and moment equilibrium with regard to a flawed section and few of them has taken into account the effects of bi-axial stressing on a flawed section, thus remaining a question whether these solutions are still valid in situations involving bi-axial loading such as the presence of pressure in a cylinder in addition to axial tension and bending. In this work, finite element analysis (FEA) of plastic collapse was systematically performed on circumferential internal surface cracks in a cylinder subjected to various combined loads, including combined tension and pressure, combined bending moment and pressure, and combined tension, bending moment and pressure. The focus was on understanding the effects of bi-axial stressing due to pressure on plastic limit load. The investigation of these cases has demonstrated a significant effect in plastic limit load arising from the application of pressure introducing a state of bi-axial stressing. Comparison of the results of plastic limit load obtained from FEA with those derived from BS 7910 reference stress solutions was carried out to assess the applicability when the standard solutions of plastic collapse are used in the applications containing bi-axial stresses.

scholarly journals Effect of Ovality in Inlet Pigtail Pipe Bends Under Combined Internal Pressure and In-Plane Bending for Ni-Fe-Cr B407 Material

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 1881-1887
Author(s):  
P. Ramaswami ◽  
P. Senthil Velmurugan ◽  
R. Rajasekar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Outer Radius ◽  
Factor H ◽  
Geometrical Shape ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Pipe Bend ◽  
Plane Bending

Abstract The present paper makes an attempt to depict the effect of ovality in the inlet pigtail pipe bend of a reformer under combined internal pressure and in-plane bending. Finite element analysis (FEA) and experiments have been used. An incoloy Ni-Fe-Cr B407 alloy material was considered for study and assumed to be elastic-perfectly plastic in behavior. The design of pipe bend is based on ASME B31.3 standard and during manufacturing process, it is challenging to avoid thickening on the inner radius and thinning on the outer radius of pipe bend. This geometrical shape imperfection is known as ovality and its effect needs investigation which is considered for the study. The finite element analysis (ANSYS-workbench) results showed that ovality affects the load carrying capacity of the pipe bend and it was varying with bend factor (h). By data fitting of finite element results, an empirical formula for the limit load of inlet pigtail pipe bend with ovality has been proposed, which is validated by experiments.

J-Integral Analysis of Surface Cracks in Round Bars under Bending Moments

2011 ◽  
Vol 52-54 ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al Emran Ismail ◽  
Ahmad Kamal Ariffin ◽  
Shahrum Abdullah ◽  
Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali ◽  
Ruslizam Daud
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Proposed Model

This paper presents a non-linear numerical investigation of surface cracks in round bars under bending moment by using ANSYS finite element analysis (FEA). Due to the symmetrical analysis, only quarter finite element (FE) model was constructed and special attention was given at the crack tip of the cracks. The surface cracks were characterized by the dimensionless crack aspect ratio, a/b = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2, while the dimensionless relative crack depth, a/D = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3. The square-root singularity of stresses and strains was modeled by shifting the mid-point nodes to the quarter-point locations close to the crack tip. The proposed model was validated with the existing model before any further analysis. The elastic-plastic analysis under remotely applied bending moment was assumed to follow the Ramberg-Osgood relation with n = 5 and 10. J values were determined for all positions along the crack front and then, the limit load was predicted using the J values obtained from FEA through the reference stress method.

A Comparative Study on Mechanical Behavior of Pipe-Socket Threaded Joints With Taper-Taper Threads and Taper-Parallel Threads Combinations by Finite Element Analysis and Experiments

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Nagata ◽  
Shinichi Fujita ◽  
Toshiyuki Sawa
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Internal Pressure ◽  
Service Condition ◽  
Internal Thread ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Strain Pattern ◽  
External Thread ◽  
Thread Length ◽  
The Difference

There are two types of combination between external and internal threads used in threaded pipe connections for pressure piping specified in industrial standards like JIS as well as ISO. One is the combination that taper external thread of pipe is engaged with taper internal thread of a fitting. The other is that taper external thread of pipe is engaged with parallel internal thread of a fitting. Taper thread is always used for external thread outside the pipe wall. Both taper thread and parallel one are applicable to internal thread inside the fittings. This paper evaluates the mechanical behaviors of threaded pipe-socket joints (or pipe-coupling joints) and the difference due to the thread type combinations by means of axisymmetric finite element analysis for 3/4” and 3” joints. The analysis shows that the taper-taper threads combination establishes the full-length contact over the engaged threads but the taper-parallel has only a pair of threads in contact at the 1st engaged thread from the end of socket, and the difference results in the different behaviors of the joints. Stress and strain pattern also completely differ due to the difference in the engaged thread length. No significant effect of the size has been found in the present analysis for 3/4”and 3” joints. Experimental tightening tests and pressure leak tests have also been carried out for 3/4” and 3” joints with taper-taper threads combination. The measured experimental stress for 3/4” joints has shown an agreement with the simulated one fairly well. The pressure leak tests have demonstrated that the taper-taper threaded pipe-socket joints can hold internal pressure without leakage without using thread seal tape or jointing compound under low-pressure service condition. The 3/4” joints have started leaking at 1–4MPaG of internal pressure. The 3” joints haven’t shown leakage even at 6MPaG of internal pressure applied.

The Evaluation of Failure Pressure for Corrosion Defects Within Girth or Seam Weld in Transmission Pipelines

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-pyo Kim ◽  
Woo-sik Kim ◽  
Young-kwang Lee ◽  
Kyu-hwan Oh
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
The Body ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Burst Test ◽  
Corrosion Defect ◽  
Seam Weld ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Corrosion Defects

The failure assessment for corroded pipeline has been considered with the burst test and the finite element analysis. The burst tests were conducted on 762mm diameter, 17.5mm wall thickness and API 5L X65 pipe that contained specially manufactured rectangular corrosion defect. The failure pressures for corroded pipeline have been measured by burst testing and classified with respect to corrosion sizes and corroded regions — the body, the girth weld and the seam weld of pipe. Finite element analysis was carried out to derive failure criteria of corrosion defect within the body, the girth weld and the seam weld of the pipe. A series of finite element analyses were performed to obtain a limit load solution for corrosion defects on the basis of burst test. As a result, the criteria for failure assessment of corrosion defect within the body, the girth weld and the seam weld of API 5L X65 gas pipeline were proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document