Impact of Articulation Geometry on Contact Mechanics in Total Ankle Replacement Design

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul A. Dharia ◽  
Jeff E. Bischoff ◽  
Duane Gillard ◽  
Fred Wentorf ◽  
Matt Mroczkowski
Keyword(s):  
Lower Risk ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Polyethylene Wear ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Articulating Surface ◽  
Replacement Design

Total ankle replacement designs have evolved since their introduction in the mid 1970s. While the first-generation total ankle replacement (TAR) designs had unacceptably high failure rates, recent designs have demonstrated improved outcomes [1]. Two philosophies are commonly used in TAR design: mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing. Unlike mobile-bearing designs which have two articulating surfaces, fixed-bearing designs have only one articulating surface. While fixed-bearing designs have lower risk of dislocation than mobile-bearing designs, the single articulation feature can produce higher contact stress on the articulating surface, increasing the potential for polyethylene wear [1, 2].

Revision Rates After Total Ankle Replacement: A Comparison of Clinical Studies and Arthroplasty Registers

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110538
Author(s):  
Georg Hauer ◽  
Reinhard Hofer ◽  
Markus Kessler ◽  
Jan Lewis ◽  
Lukas Leitner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of total ankle replacement (TAR) regarding revision rates by comparing clinical studies of the last decade to data displayed in arthroplasty registers. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether dependent clinical studies show a superior outcome to independent publications. Additionally, revision rates of mobile bearing implants (MB-TARs) were compared to those of fixed bearing implants (FB-TARs). Methods: Clinical studies on TARs between 2010 and 2020 were systematically reviewed, with the endpoint being a revision for any reason. The parameter “revision rate per 100 observed component years (CYs)” was calculated for each publication. The pooled revision rate for clinical studies was compared to the data reported in arthroplasty registers. In a second step, revision rates were subdivided and analyzed for independent and dependent publications and for FB-TARs and MB-TARs. Results: A total of 43 publications met the inclusion criteria comprising 5806 TARs. A revision rate of 1.8 per 100 observed CYs was calculated, corresponding to a 7-year revision rate of 12.6%. The 3 arthroplasty registers included showed revision rates ranging from 8.2% to 12.3% after 7 years. No significant difference between dependent and independent publications nor between FB-TARs and MB-TARs was detected. Conclusion: Revision rates of clinical studies and arthroplasty registers are comparable. Surgeons can compare their own revision rates with those from this study. Dependent studies do not seem to be biased, and no superiority for one bearing type can be described. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of level III studies

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mobile-bearing and Fixed-bearing Total Ankle Replacement

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
James Nunley ◽  
Samuel Adams ◽  
James DeOrio ◽  
Mark Easley
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Cyst Formation ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
End Stage

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Outcomes of total ankle replacement for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis continue to improve. Debate continues whether a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (MB-TAR) or a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement (FB-TAR) is superior, with successful outcomes reported longterm for MB-TAR and at intermediate-to-longterm follow-up for newer generation FB-TAR. Although comparisons between the two total ankle designs have been reported, to our knowledge, no investigation has compared the two designs with a high level of evidence. This prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a single institution compares patient satisfaction, functional outcomes and radiographic results of the mobile-bearing STAR and the fixed-bearing Salto-Talaris in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods: This investigation was approved by our institution’s IRB committee. Between November 2011 and November 2014, adult patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis failing nonoperative treatment were introduced to the study. With informed consent, 100 patients (31 male and 69 female, average age 65, range 35 to 85) were enrolled; demographic comparison between the two cohorts was similar. Exclusion criteria included inflammatory arthropathy, neuropathy, weight exceeding 250 pounds, radiographic coronal plane deformity greater than 15 degrees or extensive talar dome wear pattern (“flat top talus”). Prospective patient-reported outcomes, physical exam and standardized weightbearing ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and then at yearly intervals. Data collection included visual analog pain score (VAS), short form 36 (SF-36), foot and ankle disability index (FADI), short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA) and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Surgeries were performed by non-design team orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists with total ankle replacement expertise. Statistically analysis was performed by a qualified statistician. Results: At average follow-up of 4.5 years (range 2-6 years) complete clinical data and radiographs were available for 84 patients; 7 had incomplete data, one had died, 4 were withdrawn after enrolling but prior to surgery and 4 were lost to follow-up. In all outcome measures, the entire cohort demonstrated statistically significant improvements from preoperative evaluation to most recent follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Radiographically, tibial lucency/cyst formation was 26.8% and 20.9% for MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Tibial settling/subsidence occurred in 7.3% of MB-TAR. Talar lucency/cyst formation occurred in 24.3% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Talar subsidence was observed in 21.9% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Re-operations were performed in 8 MB-TAR and 3 FB-TAR, with the majority of procedures being to relieve impingement or treat cysts and not to revise or remove metal implants. Conclusion: For the first time, with a high level of evidence, our study confirms that patient reported and clinical outcomes are favorable for both designs and that there is no significant difference in clinical improvement between the two implants. The incidence of lucency/cyst formation was similar for MB-TAR and FB-TAR for the tibial component, but the MB-TAR had greater talar lucency/cyst formation and tibial and talar subsidence. As has been suggested in previous studies, clinical outcomes do not correlate with radiographic findings. Re-operations were more common for MB-TAR and in the majority of cases were to relieve impingement or treat cysts rather than revise or remove metal implants.

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1239-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Nunley ◽  
Samuel B. Adams ◽  
Mark E. Easley ◽  
James K. DeOrio
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Cyst Formation ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
End Stage

Background: Outcomes of total ankle replacement for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis continue to improve. Debate continues whether a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (MB-TAR) or a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement (FB-TAR) is superior, with successful outcomes reported long term for MB-TAR and at intermediate- to long-term follow-up for newer generation FB-TAR. Although comparisons between the 2 total ankle designs have been reported, to our knowledge, no investigation has compared the 2 designs with a high level of evidence. This prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a single institution compares patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and radiographic results of the mobile-bearing STAR and the fixed-bearing Salto-Talaris in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods: Between November 2011 and November 2014, adult patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis failing nonoperative treatment were introduced to the study. With informed consent, 100 patients (31 male and 69 female, average age 65 years, range 35-85 years) were enrolled; a demographic comparison between the 2 cohorts was similar. Exclusion criteria included inflammatory arthropathy, neuropathy, weight exceeding 250 pounds, radiographic coronal plane deformity greater than 15 degrees, or extensive talar dome wear pattern (“flat-top talus”). Prospective patient-reported outcomes, physical examination, and standardized weightbearing ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and then at yearly intervals. Data collection included visual analog pain score, Short Form 36, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score. Surgeries were performed by a nondesign team of orthopedic foot and ankle specialists with total ankle replacement expertise. Statistical analysis was performed by a qualified statistician. At average follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2-6 years) complete clinical data and radiographs were available for 84 patients; 7 had incomplete data, 1 had died, 4 were withdrawn after enrolling but prior to surgery, and 4 were lost to follow-up. Results: In all outcome measures, the entire cohort demonstrated statistically significant improvements from preoperative evaluation to most recent follow-up with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Radiographically, tibial lucency/cyst formation was 26.8% and 20.9% for MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Tibial settling/subsidence occurred in 7.3% of MB-TAR. Talar lucency/cyst formation occurred in 24.3% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Talar subsidence was observed in 21.9% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FH-TAR, respectively. Reoperations were performed in 8 MB-TARs and 3 FH-TARs, with the majority of procedures being to relieve impingement or treat cysts and not to revise or remove metal implants. Conclusion: With a high level of evidence, our study found that patient-reported and clinical outcomes were favorable for both designs and that there was no significant difference in clinical improvement between the 2 implants. The incidence of lucency/cyst formation was similar for MB-TAR and FH-TAR for the tibial component, but the MB-TAR had greater talar lucency/cyst formation and tibial and talar subsidence. As has been suggested in previous studies, clinical outcomes do not necessarily correlate with radiographic findings. Reoperations were more common for MB-TAR and, in most cases, were to relieve impingement or treat cysts rather than revise or remove metal implants. Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective randomized study.

scholarly journals The Effect of Exchanging a Mobile-Bearing into a Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement System in Patients with Coronal Plane Instability

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0036
Author(s):  
Roxa Ruiz ◽  
Christine Schweizer ◽  
Nicola Krähenbühl ◽  
Beat Hintermann
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Component ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Cement Spacer ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Radiographic Assessment ◽  
Ankle Replacement

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The interface between the polyethylene (PE) inlay and the tibial component in mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) systems may allow the talus to seek its position according to the individual anatomy. However, chronic overload and/or incompetence of soft tissue may allow medial and/ or lateral translation of the talar component over time. This typically results in medial and/ or lateral gutter pain as well as pain along the syndesmosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of tibial component exchange and conversion from a mobile-bearing into a fixed-bearing TAR system in patients with coronal plane instabilities TAR. Methods: A consecutive series of 30 ankles (29 patients; age 65.6 [48.9 – 86.1]; male, 23; female, 7) with coronal plane instabilities underwent revision TAR with exchange of a mobile-bearing (Hintermann Series, H3) into a fixed-bearing (Hintermann Series, H2) TAR system. Patients presented with a medial (n = 12) or lateral (n = 9) translation of the talar component, or a varus (n = 4) or valgus (n = 5) instability with subsequent tilt of the talar component. After removing the tibial component and PE inlay, a tibial osteotomy was performed and 1 to 2 mm of the distal tibia removed. A tibial component of the H2 total ankle system was inserted. While holding the foot in neutral position, the PE inlay was locked to the tibial component in the appropriate position. Functional outcome and pain were recorded to evaluate clinical outcome, and standard radiographs under fluoroscopy were taken for radiographic assessment. Results: All but one of the remaining 28 patient showed significant improvement of pain (P<0.05). Preoperative gutter pain disappeared completely in 20 ankles (71.4%), and partially in 8 ankles (18.6%). The AOFAS Hindfoot Score improved from 54.3 (range, 21 to 90) preoperatively to 74.0 (range, 48 to 92) at latest follow-up (P<0.05). Radiographic assessment showed firm osteointegration in all patients with the talar component centralized in the ankle mortise, and a free medial and lateral gutter without tilt of talar component (Figure 1). One patient with bilateral revision TAR was affected by a bilateral deep infection of both ankles 9 months after surgery subsequent to a severe pneumonia. Both ankles were removed and replaced by a cement spacer. Conclusion: Converting a mobile-bearing into a fixed-bearing TAR system has shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with coronal plane instabilities following TAR. Allowing the PE inlay to adapt its position according to the talar component before definitive fixation to the tibial component of the H2 series, saved having to replace the talar component. Future long-term studies however are needed to identify significant benefits of this novel total ankle concept in primary and revision TAR.

scholarly journals Hindfoot Alignment after Total Ankle Replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0000
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Gross ◽  
Federico Guiseppe Usuelli ◽  
Christian Indino
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Temporal Course ◽  
Over Time

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: End-stage ankle arthritis can involve misalignment of the ankle in both the coronal and sagittal planes as up to reported 33% to 44% of patients who present for total ankle replacement have greater than 10° of coronal plane deformity. Improvements in both the design and surgical technique for total ankle replacements (TAR) have allowed surgeons to tackle the most challenging of multiplanar ankle deformities. Normalization of the sagittal and coronal alignment is key in improving survivorship and functional outcomes in TAR. In the present study, we analyzed how both the ankle and hindfoot alignment for both a fixed-bearing and mobile bearing TAR system changes over time. Specifically, we measured coronal and sagittal alignment of both the ankle and hindfoot complex. We hypothesize that both significant differences would be seen between all time points and pre-operative radiographs, and that these differences would not change over time. Methods: A retrospective study performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon was performed on two independent groups of patients undergoing two different systems for total ankle replacement: Zimmer TAR (lateral-approach, fixed-bearing, n=89) and Hintegra (anterior approach, mobile-bearing, n=81). We noted specific demographic data and radiographic data were measured including: Hindfoot alignment view angle (HAV), Hindfoot alignment distance (HAVD), tibiotalar ratio, α angle and β angle. These were measured pre-operatively, and 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-operatively. Within-group comparisons were performed using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA (1-w rANOVA), analyzing temporal course of clinical data (comparisons between different time points, e.g. T0vsT6vsT12vsT24) within the Hintegra and Zimmer groups. To compare the time course of clinical measures between the two groups, 2-w rANOVAs were performed for SA, SD, TT ratio, α and β angle. Specifically, time*group interaction was tested. Results: At the ankle joint itself, as measured by the α and β angles (p>.05), the position of the components remains relatively similar in both the fixed and mobile bearing TAR over the course of 24 months. The sagittal alignment, as measured by the TT ratio, demonstrated a posterior shifting of the talus in the mobile bearing group (p=.036). Though the fixed and mobile- bearing TAR had both significant hindfoot alignment improvement between the pre-op radiographs and twenty-four months, over time, the fixed-bearing ankle had a significant increase in both the HAV and HAVD (p<.001), suggesting a dynamism of the hindfoot in the fixed-bearing ankle. Conclusion: Correcting coronal and sagittal alignment is important for the long-term survivorship of a TAR. The fixed and mobile-bearing implants had maintained coronal and sagittal alignment in the short term, the temporal course of the fixed-bearing ankle showed an increased in the valgus positioning of the hindfoot.

scholarly journals Hindfoot Alignment after Total Ankle Replacement

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0018
Author(s):  
Christopher Gross ◽  
Luigi Manzi ◽  
Cristian Indino ◽  
Fausto Romano ◽  
Camilla Maccario ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Temporal Course ◽  
Over Time

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: End-stage ankle arthritis can involve misalignment of the ankle in both the coronal and sagittal planes as up to reported 33% to 44% of patients who present for total ankle replacement have greater than 10° of coronal plane deformity. Normalization of the sagittal and coronal alignment is key in improving survivorship and functional outcomes in TAR. In the present study, we analyzed how both the ankle and hindfoot alignment for both a fixed-bearing and mobile bearing TAR system changes over time. Specifically, we measured coronal and sagittal alignment of both the ankle and hindfoot complex. We hypothesize that both significant differences would be seen between all time points and pre-operative radiographs, and that these differences would not change over time. Methods: A retrospective study performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon was performed on two independent groups of patients undergoing two different systems for total ankle replacement: Zimmer TAR (lateral-approach, fixed-bearing, n=89) and Hintegra (anterior approach, mobile-bearing, n=81). We noted specific demographic data and radiographic data were measured including: Hindfoot alignment view angle (HAV), Hindfoot alignment distance (HAVD), tibiotalar ratio, a angle and ß angle. These were measured pre-operatively, and 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-operatively. Within-group comparisons were performed using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA (1-w rANOVA), analyzing temporal course of clinical data (comparisons between different time points, e.g. T0vsT6vsT12vsT24) within the Hintegra and Zimmer groups. To compare the time course of clinical measures between the two groups, 2-w rANOVAs were performed for SA, SD, TT ratio, a and ß angle. Specifically, time*group interaction was tested. Results: At the ankle joint itself, as measured by the a and ß angles (p>.05), the position of the components remains relatively similar in both the fixed and mobile bearing TAR over the course of 24 months. The sagittal alignment, as measured by the TT ratio, demonstrated a posterior shifting of the talus in the mobile bearing group (p=.036). Though the fixed and mobile-bearing TARhad both significant hindfoot alignment improvement between the pre-op radiographs and twenty-four months, over time, the fixed-bearing ankle had a significant increase in both the HAV and HAVD (p<.001), suggesting a dynamism of the hindfoot in the fixed-bearing ankle. Conclusion: Correcting coronal and sagittal alignment is important for the long-term survivorship of a TAR. The fixed and mobile-bearing implants had maintained coronal and sagittal alignment in the short term, the temporal course of the fixed-bearing ankle showed an increased in the valgus positioning of the hindfoot. The mobile-bearing implant maintained its hindfoot alignment over the course of the study. More studies are needed to explore the clinical implications of this new data.

scholarly journals Evaluation of True Ankle Motion Following Total Ankle Replacement Utilizing XROMM technology

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0001
Author(s):  
Emily M. Abbott ◽  
Zoe Merchant ◽  
Erica Lee ◽  
Sadie M. Abernathy ◽  
Charles Hammer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Ankle Motion ◽  
Ankle Replacement

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement (TAR) is common tool used by the foot and ankle specialist to treat end stage ankle arthritis. Current data about ankle motion following TAR is derived from gait analysis utilizing external markers. Utilizing Xray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM), which combines 3-D mapping technology with biplanar fluoroscopy in vivo to visualize true skeletal motion, we can evaluate true motion of TAR implants. Current TAR replacement systems are either mobile bearing or fixed bearing. We hypothesized that subjects implanted with a fixed bearing prosthesis would exhibit less tibiotalar rotation and translation than subjects implanted with a mobile bearing prosthesis. Methods: Six subjects with total ankle replacement at least one-year post implantation gave informed consent before participating (IRB #H16496). Three subjects with a mobile bearing prosthesis with an average age 63.3+-11.1 yrs were compared to three matched subjects with a fixed bearing prosthesis with an average age of 64.7+-1.5 yrs. Utilizing 3D slicer software, lower body CT scans for each subject were evaluated to create 3D models of the foot and ankle bones and implant components. All subjects walked for several trials at a self-selected pace along a walkway while their foot and ankle motions were captured by a high-speed biplanar fluoroscopic x-ray motion analysis (XMA) system. The 3D models were combined with the x-ray images within a 3D animation platform and rotoscoped to resolve accurate kinematic motions at the tibiotalar joint during stance phase of gait. We examined for differences between the two groups using a two-sample t-test (p<0.05). Results: Subjects with a mobile-bearing prosthesis demonstrated mean ROM’s of 7.4+-1.1°, 5.3+-2.3° and 7.1+-4.3° for dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, inversion/eversion, and internal/external rotation, respectively. Subjects with a fixed bearing ankle prosthesis did not exhibit significantly different mean ROM’s for dorsiflexion/plantarflexion (9.1+-4.0°, p=0.35), inversion/eversion (4.4+-2.1°, p=0.42), and internal/external rotation (9.0+-3.4°, p=0.35), respectively. Subjects with a fixed bearing prosthesis displayed significantly more translation along the anteroposterior (3.6+-1.2mm, p<0.01) and mediolateral (2.2+-0.7mm, p<0.01) axes compared to the mobile bearing prosthesis (1.8+-1.2mm and 1.3+-0.8mm, respectively). Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that mobile and fixed bearing prosthesis provides similar angular motion at the tibiotalar joint, however, the fixed bearing prosthesis exhibits greater translational motion during walking. Further, there is the same amount of internal and external translation with both component designs. The implications of this work on success or failure of current implant designs is beyond the scope of this study but this work will provide the basis for future studies to help determine optimal future total ankle replacement designs.

Evaluation of Hindfoot Alignment After Fixed- and Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Prostheses

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-293
Author(s):  
Federico G. Usuelli ◽  
Camilla Maccario ◽  
Cristian Indino ◽  
Luigi Manzi ◽  
Fausto Romano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Temporal Course ◽  
Over Time

Background: End-stage ankle arthritis can involve malalignment of the ankle in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Up to 33% to 44% of patients who present for total ankle replacement (TAR) have greater than 10° of coronal plane deformity. Normalization of the sagittal and coronal alignment is key in improving survivorship and functional outcomes in TAR. In the present study, we analyzed how both the ankle and hindfoot alignment for both a fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TAR system changed over time. Specifically, we measured coronal and sagittal alignment of both the ankle and hindfoot complex. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 2 independent groups of patients undergoing 2 different systems for total ankle replacement: Zimmer (lateral approach, fixed-bearing) and Hintegra (anterior approach, mobile bearing). Specific demographic data and radiographic data were measured. Within-group comparisons were performed using 1-way repeated measures ANOVA, analyzing the temporal course of clinical data within the Hintegra and Zimmer groups. Results: At the ankle joint, as measured by the α and β angles ( P > .05), the position of the components remained relatively similar in both the fixed- and mobile-bearing TAR at 24-month follow-up. The sagittal alignment, as measured by the TT (tibiotalar) ratio, demonstrated a posterior shifting of the talus in the mobile bearing group ( P = .036). Although the fixed- and mobile-bearing TAR had both significant hindfoot alignment improvement between the preoperative radiographs and at 24 months, over time, the fixed-bearing ankle had a significant increase in both the hindfoot alignment view angle and hindfoot alignment distance ( P < .001), suggesting a possible dynamism of the hindfoot in the fixed-bearing TAR. Conclusion: The lateral-approach fixed and anterior approach mobile-bearing implants maintained coronal and sagittal alignment in the short term; the temporal course of the lateral approach fixed-bearing ankle showed an increase in the valgus positioning of the hindfoot. The anterior approach mobile-bearing implant maintained its hindfoot alignment over the course of the study. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

scholarly journals Clinical Radiographical Outcomes and Complications after a Brand-New Total Ankle Replacement Design through an Anterior Approach: A Retrospective at a Short-Term Follow Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2258
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Mosca ◽  
Silvio Caravelli ◽  
Emanuele Vocale ◽  
Simone Massimi ◽  
Davide Censoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Value ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Term Performance ◽  
Replacement Design

Recently, the progress in techniques and in projecting new prosthetic designs has allowed increasing indications for total ankle replacement (TAR) as treatment for ankle osteoarthritis. This retrospective work comprehended 39 subjects aged between 47 and 79 years old. The patients, observed for at least 12 months (mean follow up of 18.2 ± 4.1 months), have been evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters, both pre- and post-operatively. The AOFAS and VAS score significantly improved, respectively, from 46.2 ± 4.8 to 93.9 ± 4.1 and from 7.1 ± 1.1 to 0.7 ± 0.5 (p value < 0.05). At the final evaluation, the mean plantarflexion passed from 12.2° ± 2.3° to 18.1° ± 2.4° (p value < 0.05) and dorsiflexion from a pre-operative mean value of 8.7° ± 4.1° to 21.7° ± 5.4° post-operatively (p value < 0.05). This study found that this new total ankle replacement design is a safe and effective procedure for patients effected by end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Improvements have been demonstrated in terms of range of motion, radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes. However, further studies are needed to assess the long-term performance of these prostheses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document