Optical design of volume phase holographic grating Raman spectrometer for lunar mineral detection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birong Linghu ◽  
Bin Xue ◽  
Yiyi Zhao ◽  
Hui Wang
2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 122206
Author(s):  
何振磊 He Zhenlei ◽  
卢启鹏 Lu Qipeng ◽  
丁海泉 Ding Haiquan ◽  
高洪智 Gao Hongzhi

1977 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Walrafen

A slitless optical-fiber laser-Raman spectrometer has been developed that employs a single f/3 concave holographic diffraction grating. The exit end of an optical fiber is positioned at the grating focus, and the divergent excitation and Raman radiation are then dispersed and refocussed. Detection is accomplished by translating an exit slit and photomultiplier tube along the focal line. A moveable solid-core optical fiber that transmits light to a fixed photomultiplier tube may also be used. The holographic grating produces a straight focal line, instead of a curve, resulting in accurate focussing from 480 to 650 nm, with linear scanning. The low f-number grating was used to accommodate high numerical aperture optical fibers without loss of light. A comparison between the present spectrometer with a 55 m fused silica fiber and a Jarrell-Ash Czerny-Turner single monochromator using a 1-cm bulk sample indicates a signal/noise improvement by a factor of 137 for the very weak two-phonon band from fused silica near 1600 cm−1.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1995
Author(s):  
David Lee ◽  
Gordon D. Taylor ◽  
Thomas E. C. Baillie ◽  
David Montgomery

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel C. Barden ◽  
James A. Arns ◽  
Willis S. Colburn ◽  
Joel B. Williams

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 4125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Tamura ◽  
Graham J. Murray ◽  
Ray M. Sharples ◽  
David J. Robertson ◽  
Jeremy R. Allington-Smith

1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Everall ◽  
Harry Owen ◽  
Joe Slater

The performance of an integrated turn-key on-line Raman spectrometer based upon a multiplexed transmission holographic grating, holographic laser rejection filters, and a charge-coupled-device (CCD) detector is described and compared with a laboratory-based research-grade FT-Raman spectrometer. Data for the dispersive system were acquired with a noncontacting, confocal dual-fiber probe of up to 100-m length, with Raman shifts down to 50 cm−1 and no apparent fiber background features. Despite the fact that the FT-Raman system was directly coupled to the sample (i.e., not through fibers), the sensitivity of the dispersive system was almost three orders of magnitude greater for equivalent incident laser powers and accumulation times. The potential for performing multivariate calibrations with the dispersive equipment was also investigated. With samples of known density, it was possible to produce a partial least-squares calibration for poly(thylene terephthalate) (PET) density with a precision of 0.002 g cm−3, with the use of a two-factor model. This precision compared favorably with previous calibrations using FT-Raman data. The effect of changing the f-number of the collection optics of the fiber probe head (to allow variation in the working distance) was also examined. It was found that, for transparent samples, the f-number could be changed by a factor of three without greatly affecting the Raman signal intensity, whereas for an opaque solid increasing the f-number greatly reduced the detected intensity. The reasons for this difference are discussed


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 3773
Author(s):  
Vivek Rastogi ◽  
Shilpi Agarwal ◽  
Satish Kumar Dubey ◽  
Gufran Sayeed Khan ◽  
Chandra Shakher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document