SU-E-J-201: What is the Importance of Dose Recalculation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Dose Assessment?

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part9) ◽  
pp. 3699-3699 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Pukala ◽  
R Staton ◽  
K Langen
2020 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 108295 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.C.F. Fonseca ◽  
P.C.G. Antunes ◽  
M.C.L. Belo ◽  
F. Bastos ◽  
T.P. Campos ◽  
...  

Dose-Response ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 155932581988915
Author(s):  
Yiling Wang ◽  
Min Zheng ◽  
Ling He ◽  
Jinhui Xu ◽  
Gang Yin ◽  
...  

Due to the reported high incidence of thyroid cancer induced by radiotherapy, dose assessment is significant to prevent thyroid late effects. Thyroid dosimetry can be evaluated either by entrance skin dose (ESD) measured with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) arrays or by absorbed dose (AD) computed with treatment planning system. However, their correlation has hardly been reported in any publications. Moreover, the reported measurement procedures for thyroid ESD are usually inefficient. This study aims to provide a fast model for efficient acquisition of thyroid ESD and analyze the coherent relationship between ESD and AD. We conducted the study on the China radiation anthropomorphic phantom with intentionally delineated cancers, irradiated by a Varian 23EX linac. We have measured the ESD with TLD at 5 different points, while computed AD with the Oncentra Masterplan TPS. The ESD at the middle gorge of thyroid has exhibited significant linear correlation with those measured at other points. Furthermore, a regressive model has been proposed to predict thyroid AD from ESD. Consequently, it is recommended to only measure the ESD at the middle gorge of thyroid for an efficient dose assessment. The validity of the regressive model to predict thyroid AD from ESD has also been demonstrated.


2009 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S27
Author(s):  
Y.B. Cho ◽  
J. Xie ◽  
V. Kelly ◽  
K. Lim ◽  
J. Stewart ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1006-1015
Author(s):  
Negin Shagholi ◽  
Hassan Ali ◽  
Mahdi Sadeghi ◽  
Arjang Shahvar ◽  
Hoda Darestani ◽  
...  

Medical linear accelerators, besides the clinically high energy electron and photon beams, produce other secondary particles such as neutrons which escalate the delivered dose. In this study the neutron dose at 10 and 18MV Elekta linac was obtained by using TLD600 and TLD700 as well as Monte Carlo simulation. For neutron dose assessment in 2020 cm2 field, TLDs were calibrated at first. Gamma calibration was performed with 10 and 18 MV linac and neutron calibration was done with 241Am-Be neutron source. For simulation, MCNPX code was used then calculated neutron dose equivalent was compared with measurement data. Neutron dose equivalent at 18 MV was measured by using TLDs on the phantom surface and depths of 1, 2, 3.3, 4, 5 and 6 cm. Neutron dose at depths of less than 3.3cm was zero and maximized at the depth of 4 cm (44.39 mSvGy-1), whereas calculation resulted  in the maximum of 2.32 mSvGy-1 at the same depth. Neutron dose at 10 MV was measured by using TLDs on the phantom surface and depths of 1, 2, 2.5, 3.3, 4 and 5 cm. No photoneutron dose was observed at depths of less than 3.3cm and the maximum was at 4cm equal to 5.44mSvGy-1, however, the calculated data showed the maximum of 0.077mSvGy-1 at the same depth. The comparison between measured photo neutron dose and calculated data along the beam axis in different depths, shows that the measurement data were much more than the calculated data, so it seems that TLD600 and TLD700 pairs are not suitable dosimeters for neutron dosimetry in linac central axis due to high photon flux, whereas MCNPX Monte Carlo techniques still remain a valuable tool for photonuclear dose studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document