Comment on "Impacts of Fine Root Turnover on Forest NPP and Soil C Sequestration Potential"

Science ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 304 (5678) ◽  
pp. 1745c-1745c ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Luo
Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 302 (5649) ◽  
pp. 1385-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roser Matamala ◽  
Miquel A. Gonzàlez-Meler ◽  
Julie D. Jastrow ◽  
Richard J. Norby ◽  
William H. Schlesinger

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Vetter ◽  
Michael Martin ◽  
Pete Smith

<p>Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in to the atmosphere to limit global warming is the big challenge of the coming decades. The focus lies on negative emission technologies to remove GHGs from the atmosphere from different sectors. Agriculture produces around a quarter of all the anthropogenic GHGs globally (including land use change and afforestation). Reducing these net emissions can be achieved through techniques that increase the soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. These techniques include improved management practices in agriculture and grassland systems, which increase the organic carbon (C) input or reduce soil disturbances. The C sequestration potential differs among soils depending on climate, soil properties and management, with the highest potential for poor soils (SOC stock farthest from saturation).</p><p>Modelling can be used to estimate the technical potential to sequester C of agricultural land under different mitigation practices for the next decades under different climate scenarios. The ECOSSE model was developed to simulate soil C dynamics and GHG emissions in mineral and organic soils. A spatial version of the model (GlobalECOSSE) was adapted to simulate agricultural soils around the world to calculate the SOC change under changing management and climate.</p><p>Practices like different tillage management, crop rotations and residue incorporation showed regional differences and the importance of adapting mitigation practices under an increased changing climate. A fast adoption of practices that increase SOC has its own challenges, as the potential to sequester C is high until the soil reached a new C equilibrium. Therefore, the potential to use soil C sequestration to reduce overall GHG emissions is limited. The results showed a high potential to sequester C until 2050 but much lower rates in the second half of the century, highlighting the importance of using soil C sequestration in the coming decades to reach net zero by 2050.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuanshuai Liu ◽  
Junwei Zhao ◽  
Junying Liu ◽  
Weihua Lu ◽  
Chunhui Ma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Meng Na ◽  
Xiaoyang Sun ◽  
Yandong Zhang ◽  
Zhihu Sun ◽  
Johannes Rousk

AbstractSoil carbon (C) reservoirs held in forests play a significant role in the global C cycle. However, harvesting natural forests tend to lead to soil C loss, which can be countered by the establishment of plantations after clear cutting. Therefore, there is a need to determine how forest management can affect soil C sequestration. The management of stand density could provide an effective tool to control soil C sequestration, yet how stand density influences soil C remains an open question. To address this question, we investigated soil C storage in 8-year pure hybrid larch (Larix spp.) plantations with three densities (2000 trees ha−1, 3300 trees ha−1 and 4400 trees ha−1), established following the harvesting of secondary mixed natural forest. We found that soil C storage increased with higher tree density, which mainly correlated with increases of dissolved organic C as well as litter and root C input. In addition, soil respiration decreased with higher tree density during the most productive periods of warm and moist conditions. The reduced SOM decomposition suggested by lowered respiration was also corroborated with reduced levels of plant litter decomposition. The stimulated inputs and reduced exports of C from the forest floor resulted in a 40% higher soil C stock in high- compared to low-density forests within 8 years after plantation, providing effective advice for forest management to promote soil C sequestration in ecosystems.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia B. Gaudinski ◽  
M. S. Torn ◽  
W. J. Riley ◽  
T. E. Dawson ◽  
J. D. Joslin ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan L. Wright ◽  
Frank M. Hons ◽  
Robert G. Lemon ◽  
Mark L. McFarland ◽  
Robert L. Nichols

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document